Household fuel stacking and the persistent barriers to clean cooking transition

IF 6.1 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100476
Poushan Shrestha, Sunil Prasad Lohani
{"title":"Household fuel stacking and the persistent barriers to clean cooking transition","authors":"Poushan Shrestha,&nbsp;Sunil Prasad Lohani","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding household energy dynamics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires close examination of cooking fuel transitions and the persistent practice of fuel stacking. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and determinants of fuel stacking, with particular attention to how socioeconomic, demographic, and perceptual factors shape household cooking fuel choices and influence the transition to clean cooking. A survey of 2559 households was conducted across ten districts representing Nepal's three major physiographic regions. Data on cooking fuels, socioeconomic characteristics, and demographic attributes were collected through structured, in-person interviews. The household fuel-use patterns were classified into four categories: Traditional (firewood/solid biomass only), Transitional-Low (two fuels), Transitional-High (three or more fuels), and Clean (no firewood/solid biomass). Descriptive statistics and a Multinomial Logit (MNL) model were used to analyze fuel stacking behavior. The results show that nearly 96% of households rely on firewood as primary or secondary fuel, while 95% use two or more fuel simultaneously, underscoring the widespread persistence of fuel stacking. MNL estimates indicate that larger households are less likely to adopt transitional or clean fuel combinations, whereas higher educational attainment significantly increases the likelihood of belonging to the transitional-high and clean categories. Livestock ownership further reinforces reliance on traditional fuels as these fuels serve both cooking and animal care needs. In addition, the adoption of clean energy sources is constrained by concerns related to convenience, availability, cost, reliability, and compatibility with local cooking practices. Overall, these findings highlight the multifaceted socio-economic and perceptual challenges that impede the transition to clean cooking in LMICs. The study provides evidence-based insights to inform targeted policies and interventions aimed at accelerating clean cooking adoption and advancing progress toward SDG 7.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100476"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding household energy dynamics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires close examination of cooking fuel transitions and the persistent practice of fuel stacking. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and determinants of fuel stacking, with particular attention to how socioeconomic, demographic, and perceptual factors shape household cooking fuel choices and influence the transition to clean cooking. A survey of 2559 households was conducted across ten districts representing Nepal's three major physiographic regions. Data on cooking fuels, socioeconomic characteristics, and demographic attributes were collected through structured, in-person interviews. The household fuel-use patterns were classified into four categories: Traditional (firewood/solid biomass only), Transitional-Low (two fuels), Transitional-High (three or more fuels), and Clean (no firewood/solid biomass). Descriptive statistics and a Multinomial Logit (MNL) model were used to analyze fuel stacking behavior. The results show that nearly 96% of households rely on firewood as primary or secondary fuel, while 95% use two or more fuel simultaneously, underscoring the widespread persistence of fuel stacking. MNL estimates indicate that larger households are less likely to adopt transitional or clean fuel combinations, whereas higher educational attainment significantly increases the likelihood of belonging to the transitional-high and clean categories. Livestock ownership further reinforces reliance on traditional fuels as these fuels serve both cooking and animal care needs. In addition, the adoption of clean energy sources is constrained by concerns related to convenience, availability, cost, reliability, and compatibility with local cooking practices. Overall, these findings highlight the multifaceted socio-economic and perceptual challenges that impede the transition to clean cooking in LMICs. The study provides evidence-based insights to inform targeted policies and interventions aimed at accelerating clean cooking adoption and advancing progress toward SDG 7.
家庭燃料堆积和清洁烹饪过渡的持续障碍
要了解低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的家庭能源动态,需要仔细研究烹饪燃料的转换和持续的燃料堆积做法。本研究旨在调查燃料堆积的普遍性和决定因素,特别关注社会经济、人口统计和感知因素如何影响家庭烹饪燃料的选择,并影响向清洁烹饪的过渡。对代表尼泊尔三大地理区域的十个县的2559户家庭进行了调查。通过结构化的面对面访谈收集了烹饪燃料、社会经济特征和人口统计属性的数据。家庭燃料使用模式分为四类:传统(只有木柴/固体生物质)、过渡-低(两种燃料)、过渡-高(三种或更多燃料)和清洁(没有木柴/固体生物质)。使用描述性统计和多项Logit (MNL)模型分析燃料堆积行为。结果显示,近96%的家庭将木柴作为主要或次要燃料,而95%的家庭同时使用两种或两种以上的燃料,这突显了燃料堆积的普遍存在。MNL估计表明,较大的家庭不太可能采用过渡或清洁燃料组合,而较高的教育程度大大增加了属于过渡高和清洁类别的可能性。牲畜所有权进一步加强了对传统燃料的依赖,因为这些燃料既满足烹饪需求,也满足动物护理需求。此外,清洁能源的采用受到与便利性、可用性、成本、可靠性以及与当地烹饪方法的兼容性有关的问题的限制。总的来说,这些发现突出了阻碍中低收入国家向清洁烹饪过渡的多方面的社会经济和认知挑战。该研究提供了基于证据的见解,为有针对性的政策和干预措施提供信息,旨在加速采用清洁烹饪并推动实现可持续发展目标7的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书