Pham Thai Binh, Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hector Sala
{"title":"Who bears the carbon burden of growth? A panel analysis for OECD economies","authors":"Pham Thai Binh, Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hector Sala","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO2 emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.