Who bears the carbon burden of growth? A panel analysis for OECD economies

IF 6.1 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100472
Pham Thai Binh, Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hector Sala
{"title":"Who bears the carbon burden of growth? A panel analysis for OECD economies","authors":"Pham Thai Binh,&nbsp;Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen,&nbsp;Hector Sala","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO2 emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.
谁来承担经济增长带来的碳负担?经合组织经济体的小组分析
谁来承担经济增长的碳负担?本文介绍了分配环境库兹涅茨曲线(DEKC),这是一个扩展传统EKC的框架,用于研究收入分配的前10%和后50%之间二氧化碳排放不平等的动态。利用1980-2023年间来自38个经合组织国家的面板数据,我们应用了一系列面板协整方法来估计长期关系,并从模型的分布结构中得出了三个可检验的预测。分析证实,人均收入与排放不平等之间存在强大的倒u型关系,在首选规范中,转折点约为108,000美元(2015年价格)。在此基线之外,确定了三个制约因素:消费异质性放大了收入-排放不平等关系(预测A);更大的中产阶级缓冲了投资的分配影响(预测B);高度不平等国家的DEKC轨迹更为陡峭,在较低收入水平处达到拐点(预测C)。投资与排放不平等呈正相关,而贸易开放和城市化则起到缓解长期影响的作用。碳强度加深了不平等,强调了能源系统构成的分配后果。这些发现表明,仅靠增长并不能解决不平等的碳负担,而分配结构——消费模式、中产阶级规模和最初的不平等——在很大程度上决定了发展过程中排放差异的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书