Investigation on combustion performance enhancement and hydrocarbon emission reduction of a heavy-duty natural gas engine using eccentric intake and high-tumble-ratio flow
Chuanfu Kou, Changling Feng, Dezhong Ning, Chen Xiang, Yan Tan, Jiaqiang E
{"title":"Investigation on combustion performance enhancement and hydrocarbon emission reduction of a heavy-duty natural gas engine using eccentric intake and high-tumble-ratio flow","authors":"Chuanfu Kou, Changling Feng, Dezhong Ning, Chen Xiang, Yan Tan, Jiaqiang E","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2026.105249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To balance structural reliability and combustion efficiency in a heavy-duty natural gas engine, this study numerically investigated the effects of eccentric intake (v01) and high-tumble-ratio flow (v02) designs on a 16 L engine, using the baseline model as reference. Comparative analyses were conducted at brake thermal efficiency (1100 r/min) and rated power (1700 r/min) conditions under both equal electric control and equal peak pressure constraints. The v01 configuration enhanced in-cylinder tumble and turbulence, increasing the tumble ratio X-component nearly fivefold and turbulent kinetic energy by 7.6% at 1100 r/min. This resulted in shortened ignition delay (12–15%) and combustion duration (7–9%), with more concentrated heat release. Accordingly, v01 reduced high-pressure indicated specific fuel consumption by 0.60–0.81% and lowered unburned hydrocarbon emissions by 42.7–60.0%, while NOx emissions increased by 25–28%. Although the v02 configuration exhibited superior thermal efficiency and HC reduction, its substantially higher thermal load (51.0% vs. 32.2% for v01) raised concerns about cooling system demands and long-term durability. Given the limited efficiency gain of v02 over v01, the v01 scheme achieves a more balanced trade-off among efficiency, emissions, and thermal risk in the current evaluation framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 105249"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826004352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To balance structural reliability and combustion efficiency in a heavy-duty natural gas engine, this study numerically investigated the effects of eccentric intake (v01) and high-tumble-ratio flow (v02) designs on a 16 L engine, using the baseline model as reference. Comparative analyses were conducted at brake thermal efficiency (1100 r/min) and rated power (1700 r/min) conditions under both equal electric control and equal peak pressure constraints. The v01 configuration enhanced in-cylinder tumble and turbulence, increasing the tumble ratio X-component nearly fivefold and turbulent kinetic energy by 7.6% at 1100 r/min. This resulted in shortened ignition delay (12–15%) and combustion duration (7–9%), with more concentrated heat release. Accordingly, v01 reduced high-pressure indicated specific fuel consumption by 0.60–0.81% and lowered unburned hydrocarbon emissions by 42.7–60.0%, while NOx emissions increased by 25–28%. Although the v02 configuration exhibited superior thermal efficiency and HC reduction, its substantially higher thermal load (51.0% vs. 32.2% for v01) raised concerns about cooling system demands and long-term durability. Given the limited efficiency gain of v02 over v01, the v01 scheme achieves a more balanced trade-off among efficiency, emissions, and thermal risk in the current evaluation framework.
期刊介绍:
Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.