Investigation on combustion performance enhancement and hydrocarbon emission reduction of a heavy-duty natural gas engine using eccentric intake and high-tumble-ratio flow

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Chuanfu Kou, Changling Feng, Dezhong Ning, Chen Xiang, Yan Tan, Jiaqiang E
{"title":"Investigation on combustion performance enhancement and hydrocarbon emission reduction of a heavy-duty natural gas engine using eccentric intake and high-tumble-ratio flow","authors":"Chuanfu Kou,&nbsp;Changling Feng,&nbsp;Dezhong Ning,&nbsp;Chen Xiang,&nbsp;Yan Tan,&nbsp;Jiaqiang E","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2026.105249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To balance structural reliability and combustion efficiency in a heavy-duty natural gas engine, this study numerically investigated the effects of eccentric intake (v01) and high-tumble-ratio flow (v02) designs on a 16 L engine, using the baseline model as reference. Comparative analyses were conducted at brake thermal efficiency (1100 r/min) and rated power (1700 r/min) conditions under both equal electric control and equal peak pressure constraints. The v01 configuration enhanced in-cylinder tumble and turbulence, increasing the tumble ratio X-component nearly fivefold and turbulent kinetic energy by 7.6% at 1100 r/min. This resulted in shortened ignition delay (12–15%) and combustion duration (7–9%), with more concentrated heat release. Accordingly, v01 reduced high-pressure indicated specific fuel consumption by 0.60–0.81% and lowered unburned hydrocarbon emissions by 42.7–60.0%, while NOx emissions increased by 25–28%. Although the v02 configuration exhibited superior thermal efficiency and HC reduction, its substantially higher thermal load (51.0% vs. 32.2% for v01) raised concerns about cooling system demands and long-term durability. Given the limited efficiency gain of v02 over v01, the v01 scheme achieves a more balanced trade-off among efficiency, emissions, and thermal risk in the current evaluation framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 105249"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826004352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To balance structural reliability and combustion efficiency in a heavy-duty natural gas engine, this study numerically investigated the effects of eccentric intake (v01) and high-tumble-ratio flow (v02) designs on a 16 L engine, using the baseline model as reference. Comparative analyses were conducted at brake thermal efficiency (1100 r/min) and rated power (1700 r/min) conditions under both equal electric control and equal peak pressure constraints. The v01 configuration enhanced in-cylinder tumble and turbulence, increasing the tumble ratio X-component nearly fivefold and turbulent kinetic energy by 7.6% at 1100 r/min. This resulted in shortened ignition delay (12–15%) and combustion duration (7–9%), with more concentrated heat release. Accordingly, v01 reduced high-pressure indicated specific fuel consumption by 0.60–0.81% and lowered unburned hydrocarbon emissions by 42.7–60.0%, while NOx emissions increased by 25–28%. Although the v02 configuration exhibited superior thermal efficiency and HC reduction, its substantially higher thermal load (51.0% vs. 32.2% for v01) raised concerns about cooling system demands and long-term durability. Given the limited efficiency gain of v02 over v01, the v01 scheme achieves a more balanced trade-off among efficiency, emissions, and thermal risk in the current evaluation framework.

Abstract Image

采用偏心进气和高转捩比流提高重型天然气发动机燃烧性能和降低碳氢化合物排放的研究
为了平衡重型天然气发动机的结构可靠性和燃烧效率,本研究以基准模型为参考,对一台16l发动机进行了偏心进气(v01)和高转流比(v02)设计的影响进行了数值研究。在等电控制和等峰值压力约束下,对制动热效率(1100 r/min)和额定功率(1700 r/min)进行了对比分析。v01结构增强了缸内翻滚和湍流,在1100 r/min时,翻滚比x分量增加了近5倍,湍流动能增加了7.6%。这使得点火延迟(12-15%)和燃烧持续时间(7-9%)缩短,热量释放更加集中。因此,v01将高压指示比油耗降低0.60-0.81%,未燃烧碳氢化合物排放量降低42.7-60.0%,而NOx排放量增加25-28%。尽管v02配置表现出卓越的热效率和HC降低,但其高得多的热负荷(51.0% vs. v01的32.2%)引起了人们对冷却系统需求和长期耐久性的担忧。鉴于v02相对于v01的效率增益有限,在当前的评估框架中,v01方案在效率、排放和热风险之间实现了更平衡的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书