The calibration of five-hole probes for use in low-Reynolds number flows

IF 2.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Jonas Stürznickel, Romuald Skoda, Maximilian Passmann
{"title":"The calibration of five-hole probes for use in low-Reynolds number flows","authors":"Jonas Stürznickel,&nbsp;Romuald Skoda,&nbsp;Maximilian Passmann","doi":"10.1007/s00348-026-04275-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Five-hole probes are a well-established measurement technique for flow surveys in fluid mechanics and fluid machinery, where the probe calibration is known to become sensitive to Reynolds number below a probe-geometry-specific critical Reynolds number. Nevertheless, probes are typically calibrated at a single Reynolds number—particularly for use in incompressible flow-resulting in significant measurement errors in typical technical flows with strong velocity and Reynolds number variations. To address this limitation, this paper presents a Reynolds number-dependent calibration method based on repeated probe calibration over Reynolds numbers ranging from 2000 to 20000. A novel Reynolds number coefficient is introduced, extending conventional two-dimensional calibration maps into a three-dimensional calibration space. Two data-reduction strategies are investigated: three-dimensional interpolation and artificial neural networks. The proposed method is evaluated using the open-access Oxford Probe and compared against conventional probe calibrations at constant Reynolds number. Compared with conventional constant-Reynolds number calibrations, the proposed Reynolds number-dependent approach reduced the errors by up to <span>\\({50\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> in flow angles, <span>\\({70\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> in total pressure, and <span>\\({60\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> in dynamic pressure. Artificial neural network-based regression provides a further reduction of approximately <span>\\({30\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> relative to the interpolation-based calibration in all flow quantities. A parametric study demonstrates the effects of network architecture and size on the calibration errors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":554,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Fluids","volume":"67 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-026-04275-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-026-04275-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five-hole probes are a well-established measurement technique for flow surveys in fluid mechanics and fluid machinery, where the probe calibration is known to become sensitive to Reynolds number below a probe-geometry-specific critical Reynolds number. Nevertheless, probes are typically calibrated at a single Reynolds number—particularly for use in incompressible flow-resulting in significant measurement errors in typical technical flows with strong velocity and Reynolds number variations. To address this limitation, this paper presents a Reynolds number-dependent calibration method based on repeated probe calibration over Reynolds numbers ranging from 2000 to 20000. A novel Reynolds number coefficient is introduced, extending conventional two-dimensional calibration maps into a three-dimensional calibration space. Two data-reduction strategies are investigated: three-dimensional interpolation and artificial neural networks. The proposed method is evaluated using the open-access Oxford Probe and compared against conventional probe calibrations at constant Reynolds number. Compared with conventional constant-Reynolds number calibrations, the proposed Reynolds number-dependent approach reduced the errors by up to \({50\,\mathrm{\%}}\) in flow angles, \({70\,\mathrm{\%}}\) in total pressure, and \({60\,\mathrm{\%}}\) in dynamic pressure. Artificial neural network-based regression provides a further reduction of approximately \({30\,\mathrm{\%}}\) relative to the interpolation-based calibration in all flow quantities. A parametric study demonstrates the effects of network architecture and size on the calibration errors.

Abstract Image

用于低雷诺数流动的五孔探头的校准
五孔探头是流体力学和流体机械中流动测量的一种成熟的测量技术,已知探头校准对低于探头几何特定临界雷诺数的雷诺数非常敏感。然而,探针通常是在单一雷诺数下进行校准的,特别是在不可压缩流动中,这导致在典型的技术流动中,由于速度和雷诺数的变化很大,测量误差很大。为了解决这一限制,本文提出了一种基于2000至20000雷诺数范围内重复探针校准的雷诺数相关校准方法。引入了一种新的雷诺数系数,将传统的二维标定图扩展到三维标定空间。研究了两种数据约简策略:三维插值和人工神经网络。采用开放获取的牛津探针对所提出的方法进行了评估,并与传统的恒定雷诺数探针校准进行了比较。与传统的恒定雷诺数校准方法相比,本文提出的基于雷诺数的校准方法在流动角、总压和动压方面的误差分别降低了\({50\,\mathrm{\%}}\)、\({70\,\mathrm{\%}}\)和\({60\,\mathrm{\%}}\)。与基于插值的校准相比,基于人工神经网络的回归在所有流量中提供了大约\({30\,\mathrm{\%}}\)的进一步减少。参数化研究表明了网络结构和网络规模对标定误差的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experiments in Fluids
Experiments in Fluids 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Experiments in Fluids examines the advancement, extension, and improvement of new techniques of flow measurement. The journal also publishes contributions that employ existing experimental techniques to gain an understanding of the underlying flow physics in the areas of turbulence, aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, convective heat transfer, combustion, turbomachinery, multi-phase flows, and chemical, biological and geological flows. In addition, readers will find papers that report on investigations combining experimental and analytical/numerical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书