Jonas Stürznickel, Romuald Skoda, Maximilian Passmann
{"title":"The calibration of five-hole probes for use in low-Reynolds number flows","authors":"Jonas Stürznickel, Romuald Skoda, Maximilian Passmann","doi":"10.1007/s00348-026-04275-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Five-hole probes are a well-established measurement technique for flow surveys in fluid mechanics and fluid machinery, where the probe calibration is known to become sensitive to Reynolds number below a probe-geometry-specific critical Reynolds number. Nevertheless, probes are typically calibrated at a single Reynolds number—particularly for use in incompressible flow-resulting in significant measurement errors in typical technical flows with strong velocity and Reynolds number variations. To address this limitation, this paper presents a Reynolds number-dependent calibration method based on repeated probe calibration over Reynolds numbers ranging from 2000 to 20000. A novel Reynolds number coefficient is introduced, extending conventional two-dimensional calibration maps into a three-dimensional calibration space. Two data-reduction strategies are investigated: three-dimensional interpolation and artificial neural networks. The proposed method is evaluated using the open-access Oxford Probe and compared against conventional probe calibrations at constant Reynolds number. Compared with conventional constant-Reynolds number calibrations, the proposed Reynolds number-dependent approach reduced the errors by up to <span>\\({50\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> in flow angles, <span>\\({70\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> in total pressure, and <span>\\({60\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> in dynamic pressure. Artificial neural network-based regression provides a further reduction of approximately <span>\\({30\\,\\mathrm{\\%}}\\)</span> relative to the interpolation-based calibration in all flow quantities. A parametric study demonstrates the effects of network architecture and size on the calibration errors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":554,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Fluids","volume":"67 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-026-04275-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-026-04275-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Five-hole probes are a well-established measurement technique for flow surveys in fluid mechanics and fluid machinery, where the probe calibration is known to become sensitive to Reynolds number below a probe-geometry-specific critical Reynolds number. Nevertheless, probes are typically calibrated at a single Reynolds number—particularly for use in incompressible flow-resulting in significant measurement errors in typical technical flows with strong velocity and Reynolds number variations. To address this limitation, this paper presents a Reynolds number-dependent calibration method based on repeated probe calibration over Reynolds numbers ranging from 2000 to 20000. A novel Reynolds number coefficient is introduced, extending conventional two-dimensional calibration maps into a three-dimensional calibration space. Two data-reduction strategies are investigated: three-dimensional interpolation and artificial neural networks. The proposed method is evaluated using the open-access Oxford Probe and compared against conventional probe calibrations at constant Reynolds number. Compared with conventional constant-Reynolds number calibrations, the proposed Reynolds number-dependent approach reduced the errors by up to \({50\,\mathrm{\%}}\) in flow angles, \({70\,\mathrm{\%}}\) in total pressure, and \({60\,\mathrm{\%}}\) in dynamic pressure. Artificial neural network-based regression provides a further reduction of approximately \({30\,\mathrm{\%}}\) relative to the interpolation-based calibration in all flow quantities. A parametric study demonstrates the effects of network architecture and size on the calibration errors.
期刊介绍:
Experiments in Fluids examines the advancement, extension, and improvement of new techniques of flow measurement. The journal also publishes contributions that employ existing experimental techniques to gain an understanding of the underlying flow physics in the areas of turbulence, aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, convective heat transfer, combustion, turbomachinery, multi-phase flows, and chemical, biological and geological flows. In addition, readers will find papers that report on investigations combining experimental and analytical/numerical approaches.