Decision-Making in Surgical Treatment for Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (PICA) Aneurysm.

IF 1.6 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI:10.21315/mjms-05-2025-349
Sarah Atiqah Mohd Zamri, Nurfaten Hamzah, Thinesh Kumaran Jayaraman
{"title":"Decision-Making in Surgical Treatment for Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (PICA) Aneurysm.","authors":"Sarah Atiqah Mohd Zamri, Nurfaten Hamzah, Thinesh Kumaran Jayaraman","doi":"10.21315/mjms-05-2025-349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm is rare. Endovascular treatment does not provide a decompressive effect, and the complex morphological features of PICA aneurysm make treatment approaches challenging. The objective of this study was to formulate a decision-making guide for PICA aneurysm according to location, based on an illustrative case and a review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2022 until April 2023, a total of 157 aneurysm cases were treated using surgical and endovascular intervention. Fourteen patients were confirmed to have PICA aneurysm based on cerebral DSA/CTA. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, radiological findings, treatment plans, and outcomes were analysed. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), with scores of zero to three considered good. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, and McNemar test, where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total aneurysm cases, 8.9% were ruptured PICA aneurysms. Seven cases were located at the proximal PICA (P1 = 4 cases, P2 = 3), two cases at the mid PICA (P3), and five cases at the distal PICA (P4, P5). Out of 14 PICA aneurysms cases, nine were saccular, four were fusiform, and one was a dissecting aneurysm. Three patients underwent endovascular intervention (two saccular and one dissecting), while 11 underwent surgery (1 PICA-PICA <i>in situ</i> bypass with vertebral artery ligation, and 10 craniotomies with aneurysm clipping, with or without aneurysm reconstruction). Seven of 14 patients initially presented with good mRS scores, and at discharge, 10 patients had good scores. At discharge, two of three patients who had endovascular intervention had good mRS scores, and eight of 11 patients who went for surgery achieved good outcomes. Comparative analyses revealed no statistically significant associations between intervention type, aneurysm complexity, or location and outcome (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The McNemar test showed no significant difference between pre- and postoperative mRS scores (<i>P</i> = 0.25). However, a clinical trend toward improvement was observed, with the proportion of patients achieving good functional outcomes increasing from 50% before surgery to 71.4% at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Favourable outcomes could be achieved when PICA aneurysm is treated with appropriate surgical strategies by experienced surgeons. Neurovascular surgeon must acquire knowledge of different surgical approaches and the technical skills required to perform these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"32 6","pages":"131-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13419060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms-05-2025-349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm is rare. Endovascular treatment does not provide a decompressive effect, and the complex morphological features of PICA aneurysm make treatment approaches challenging. The objective of this study was to formulate a decision-making guide for PICA aneurysm according to location, based on an illustrative case and a review of the literature.

Methods: From January 2022 until April 2023, a total of 157 aneurysm cases were treated using surgical and endovascular intervention. Fourteen patients were confirmed to have PICA aneurysm based on cerebral DSA/CTA. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, radiological findings, treatment plans, and outcomes were analysed. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), with scores of zero to three considered good. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, and McNemar test, where appropriate.

Results: Of the total aneurysm cases, 8.9% were ruptured PICA aneurysms. Seven cases were located at the proximal PICA (P1 = 4 cases, P2 = 3), two cases at the mid PICA (P3), and five cases at the distal PICA (P4, P5). Out of 14 PICA aneurysms cases, nine were saccular, four were fusiform, and one was a dissecting aneurysm. Three patients underwent endovascular intervention (two saccular and one dissecting), while 11 underwent surgery (1 PICA-PICA in situ bypass with vertebral artery ligation, and 10 craniotomies with aneurysm clipping, with or without aneurysm reconstruction). Seven of 14 patients initially presented with good mRS scores, and at discharge, 10 patients had good scores. At discharge, two of three patients who had endovascular intervention had good mRS scores, and eight of 11 patients who went for surgery achieved good outcomes. Comparative analyses revealed no statistically significant associations between intervention type, aneurysm complexity, or location and outcome (P > 0.05). The McNemar test showed no significant difference between pre- and postoperative mRS scores (P = 0.25). However, a clinical trend toward improvement was observed, with the proportion of patients achieving good functional outcomes increasing from 50% before surgery to 71.4% at discharge.

Conclusion: Favourable outcomes could be achieved when PICA aneurysm is treated with appropriate surgical strategies by experienced surgeons. Neurovascular surgeon must acquire knowledge of different surgical approaches and the technical skills required to perform these procedures.

小脑后下动脉(PICA)动脉瘤手术治疗的决策。
背景:小脑后下动脉(PICA)动脉瘤很少见。血管内治疗不能提供减压效果,异位动脉瘤复杂的形态特征使治疗方法具有挑战性。本研究的目的是根据一个说明性病例和文献综述,制定异位动脉瘤的决策指南。方法:自2022年1月至2023年4月,对157例动脉瘤患者采用手术联合血管内介入治疗。14例患者经脑DSA/CTA检查证实为异食性动脉瘤。分析了人口统计学资料、临床特征、放射学表现、治疗方案和结果。使用改进的兰金量表(mRS)评估结果,0到3分被认为是好的。统计分析包括Fisher精确检验、卡方检验和McNemar检验。结果:异位动脉瘤破裂占总动脉瘤病例的8.9%。7例位于PICA近端(P1 = 4, P2 = 3), 2例位于PICA中端(P3), 5例位于PICA远端(P4, P5)。14例异位动脉瘤中,9例为囊状动脉瘤,4例为梭状动脉瘤,1例为夹层动脉瘤。3例患者接受了血管内介入治疗(2例囊性介入,1例解剖),11例患者接受了手术(1例PICA-PICA原位搭桥合并椎动脉结扎,10例开颅手术合并动脉瘤夹闭,伴或不伴动脉瘤重建)。14例患者中有7例最初表现为良好的mRS评分,出院时,10例患者评分良好。出院时,3名接受血管内介入治疗的患者中有2名的mRS评分良好,11名接受手术治疗的患者中有8名获得了良好的结果。对比分析显示,干预类型、动脉瘤复杂性或位置与预后无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。McNemar试验显示术前和术后mRS评分无显著差异(P = 0.25)。然而,观察到临床改善的趋势,获得良好功能结局的患者比例从术前的50%增加到出院时的71.4%。结论:经验丰富的外科医生采用适当的手术策略治疗异位动脉瘤可取得良好的效果。神经血管外科医生必须掌握不同手术入路的知识和执行这些手术所需的技术技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书