{"title":"Evaluation of Clinical Safety of 4% Articaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Non-surgical Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.","authors":"Sindhuja Singhu, Harish Kalarikkal Mukundan, Karthik Nandakumar, Sai Aditiya Narayanan Radhakrishnan, Ramkarthik Sivaseelan, Vikraman Baskara Pandian","doi":"10.1007/s12663-026-03127-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving profound local anesthesia during mandibular third molar extraction can be challenging because of dense cortical bone and anatomical variations. Articaine has gained increasing attention due to its superior tissue penetration, faster onset, and longer duration of action, but concerns regarding its potential neurotoxic effects when used in mandibular nerve blocks, remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty patients aged 18-60 years were enrolled following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensuring the absence of radiographic proximity of the third molar to the inferior alveolar nerve and the absence of periapical pathology. Clinical parameters, including onset and duration of anesthesia, intra-operative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and postoperative neurosensory responses, were evaluated using standardized tests (brush stroke directional discrimination, two-point discrimination, and pin-prick nociception) on days 1, 3, and 5 post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean onset and duration of anesthesia were 1.30 ± 0.33 min and 4.22 ± 1.09 h, respectively, and the mean intra-operative pain score was 1.10 ± 0.78. No neurosensory deficits were observed during the 5-day follow-up period; however, long-term complications cannot be excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this single-arm study without a comparator group and involving low-risk, non-surgical extractions, 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine demonstrated effective anesthesia with no clinically detectable neurosensory impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"25 4","pages":"1127-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13415423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-026-03127-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving profound local anesthesia during mandibular third molar extraction can be challenging because of dense cortical bone and anatomical variations. Articaine has gained increasing attention due to its superior tissue penetration, faster onset, and longer duration of action, but concerns regarding its potential neurotoxic effects when used in mandibular nerve blocks, remain controversial.
Method: Fifty patients aged 18-60 years were enrolled following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensuring the absence of radiographic proximity of the third molar to the inferior alveolar nerve and the absence of periapical pathology. Clinical parameters, including onset and duration of anesthesia, intra-operative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and postoperative neurosensory responses, were evaluated using standardized tests (brush stroke directional discrimination, two-point discrimination, and pin-prick nociception) on days 1, 3, and 5 post-operatively.
Results: The mean onset and duration of anesthesia were 1.30 ± 0.33 min and 4.22 ± 1.09 h, respectively, and the mean intra-operative pain score was 1.10 ± 0.78. No neurosensory deficits were observed during the 5-day follow-up period; however, long-term complications cannot be excluded.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this single-arm study without a comparator group and involving low-risk, non-surgical extractions, 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine demonstrated effective anesthesia with no clinically detectable neurosensory impairment.
期刊介绍:
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.