Evaluation of Clinical Safety of 4% Articaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Non-surgical Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.

IF 0.7 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-15 DOI:10.1007/s12663-026-03127-0
Sindhuja Singhu, Harish Kalarikkal Mukundan, Karthik Nandakumar, Sai Aditiya Narayanan Radhakrishnan, Ramkarthik Sivaseelan, Vikraman Baskara Pandian
{"title":"Evaluation of Clinical Safety of 4% Articaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Non-surgical Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.","authors":"Sindhuja Singhu, Harish Kalarikkal Mukundan, Karthik Nandakumar, Sai Aditiya Narayanan Radhakrishnan, Ramkarthik Sivaseelan, Vikraman Baskara Pandian","doi":"10.1007/s12663-026-03127-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving profound local anesthesia during mandibular third molar extraction can be challenging because of dense cortical bone and anatomical variations. Articaine has gained increasing attention due to its superior tissue penetration, faster onset, and longer duration of action, but concerns regarding its potential neurotoxic effects when used in mandibular nerve blocks, remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty patients aged 18-60 years were enrolled following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensuring the absence of radiographic proximity of the third molar to the inferior alveolar nerve and the absence of periapical pathology. Clinical parameters, including onset and duration of anesthesia, intra-operative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and postoperative neurosensory responses, were evaluated using standardized tests (brush stroke directional discrimination, two-point discrimination, and pin-prick nociception) on days 1, 3, and 5 post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean onset and duration of anesthesia were 1.30 ± 0.33 min and 4.22 ± 1.09 h, respectively, and the mean intra-operative pain score was 1.10 ± 0.78. No neurosensory deficits were observed during the 5-day follow-up period; however, long-term complications cannot be excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this single-arm study without a comparator group and involving low-risk, non-surgical extractions, 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine demonstrated effective anesthesia with no clinically detectable neurosensory impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"25 4","pages":"1127-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13415423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-026-03127-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving profound local anesthesia during mandibular third molar extraction can be challenging because of dense cortical bone and anatomical variations. Articaine has gained increasing attention due to its superior tissue penetration, faster onset, and longer duration of action, but concerns regarding its potential neurotoxic effects when used in mandibular nerve blocks, remain controversial.

Method: Fifty patients aged 18-60 years were enrolled following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensuring the absence of radiographic proximity of the third molar to the inferior alveolar nerve and the absence of periapical pathology. Clinical parameters, including onset and duration of anesthesia, intra-operative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and postoperative neurosensory responses, were evaluated using standardized tests (brush stroke directional discrimination, two-point discrimination, and pin-prick nociception) on days 1, 3, and 5 post-operatively.

Results: The mean onset and duration of anesthesia were 1.30 ± 0.33 min and 4.22 ± 1.09 h, respectively, and the mean intra-operative pain score was 1.10 ± 0.78. No neurosensory deficits were observed during the 5-day follow-up period; however, long-term complications cannot be excluded.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this single-arm study without a comparator group and involving low-risk, non-surgical extractions, 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine demonstrated effective anesthesia with no clinically detectable neurosensory impairment.

4%阿替卡因下牙槽神经阻滞非手术治疗下颌第三磨牙的临床安全性评价。
在下颌第三磨牙拔牙过程中实现深度局部麻醉是具有挑战性的,因为密集的皮质骨和解剖变化。阿替卡因由于其优越的组织穿透性、更快的起效速度和更长的作用持续时间而受到越来越多的关注,但对其用于下颌神经阻滞时潜在的神经毒性作用的担忧仍然存在争议。方法:50例年龄在18-60岁之间的患者,遵循严格的纳入和排除标准,确保第三磨牙与下牙槽神经没有x线接近,没有根尖周围病理。临床参数,包括麻醉的开始和持续时间,术中疼痛用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估,术后神经感觉反应,在术后第1、3和5天使用标准化测试(笔触方向识别、两点识别和针刺伤害感觉)评估。结果:麻醉起始时间平均为1.30±0.33 min,麻醉时间平均为4.22±1.09 h,术中疼痛评分平均为1.10±0.78。5天随访期间未见神经感觉障碍;然而,不能排除长期并发症。结论:在这项没有比较组的单臂研究的局限性内,涉及低风险,非手术提取,4%阿替卡因与1:10万肾上腺素的麻醉效果良好,没有临床可检测到的神经感觉损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书