The Importance of historical context for medical education: the example of Ethiopia.

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dawit Wondimagegn, Lucy Vorobej, Melaku Taye, Adane Petros, Cynthia Whitehead
{"title":"The Importance of historical context for medical education: the example of Ethiopia.","authors":"Dawit Wondimagegn, Lucy Vorobej, Melaku Taye, Adane Petros, Cynthia Whitehead","doi":"10.1007/s10459-026-10567-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Histories of African medical education are typically narrated through a colonial-to-postcolonial sequence that does not fit Ethiopia. Ethiopia preserved its sovereignty. Yet its formal medical education has been heavily shaped by imported curricular models, expatriate faculty, and an ideal of 'international acceptability' / 'modernization' that has outlasted successive regimes. With close attention to the specific context of medical education in Ethiopia, this paper challenges broad, one-size-fits-all accounts of colonial influence. In this paper, we trace the history of medical education in Ethiopia, drawing on published historical scholarship and archival documents. Through attention to the specific historical context of Ethiopia, this case underscores that political sovereignty alone did not produce epistemological independence. In Ethiopia, across all periods, Ethiopian indigenous healing pedagogies have remained outside the 'modern' curricular frame. Foreign epistemic forms, introduced through invitation and emulation, persisted as mechanisms distinct from administrative colonization, yet still exerted a powerful influence. Historical scholarship with its call to be deeply attentive to context, continuity, and change over time offers a useful pathway to understand why colonial logics persist in contemporary medical education reform. This paper also presents models of international collaboration that have been developed in response to these historical insights. Efforts, such as the Toronto Addis Ababa Academic Collaboration and the African Hub for Innovation and Critical Scholarship in Health Professions Education, envision making 'Ethiopianisation' an epistemological project that replaces the imported model.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-026-10567-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Histories of African medical education are typically narrated through a colonial-to-postcolonial sequence that does not fit Ethiopia. Ethiopia preserved its sovereignty. Yet its formal medical education has been heavily shaped by imported curricular models, expatriate faculty, and an ideal of 'international acceptability' / 'modernization' that has outlasted successive regimes. With close attention to the specific context of medical education in Ethiopia, this paper challenges broad, one-size-fits-all accounts of colonial influence. In this paper, we trace the history of medical education in Ethiopia, drawing on published historical scholarship and archival documents. Through attention to the specific historical context of Ethiopia, this case underscores that political sovereignty alone did not produce epistemological independence. In Ethiopia, across all periods, Ethiopian indigenous healing pedagogies have remained outside the 'modern' curricular frame. Foreign epistemic forms, introduced through invitation and emulation, persisted as mechanisms distinct from administrative colonization, yet still exerted a powerful influence. Historical scholarship with its call to be deeply attentive to context, continuity, and change over time offers a useful pathway to understand why colonial logics persist in contemporary medical education reform. This paper also presents models of international collaboration that have been developed in response to these historical insights. Efforts, such as the Toronto Addis Ababa Academic Collaboration and the African Hub for Innovation and Critical Scholarship in Health Professions Education, envision making 'Ethiopianisation' an epistemological project that replaces the imported model.

历史背景对医学教育的重要性:以埃塞俄比亚为例。
非洲医学教育的历史通常是通过殖民到后殖民的顺序来叙述的,这并不适合埃塞俄比亚。埃塞俄比亚保留了自己的主权。然而,它的正规医学教育在很大程度上受到了进口课程模式、外籍教师和一种“国际可接受性”/“现代化”的理想的影响,这种观念比历届政权都要持久。密切关注埃塞俄比亚医学教育的具体背景,本文挑战了殖民影响的广泛,一刀切的说法。在本文中,我们追溯医学教育在埃塞俄比亚的历史,借鉴出版的历史学术和档案文件。通过对埃塞俄比亚特定历史背景的关注,这个案例强调了政治主权本身并没有产生认识论上的独立。在埃塞俄比亚,在所有时期,埃塞俄比亚土著治疗教学法一直处于“现代”课程框架之外。通过邀请和模仿引入的外国知识形式,作为有别于行政殖民的机制而持续存在,但仍然发挥着强大的影响。历史学术呼吁深入关注背景、连续性和随时间的变化,这为理解为什么殖民逻辑在当代医学教育改革中持续存在提供了一条有用的途径。本文还介绍了为响应这些历史见解而发展起来的国际合作模式。诸如多伦多亚的斯亚贝巴学术合作和非洲卫生专业教育创新和关键奖学金中心等努力设想使“埃塞俄比亚化”成为一个认识论项目,取代进口模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书