Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices in Indian Intensive Care Units: A National Cross-sectional Survey of Intensive Care Unit Consultants.

IF 2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anirban Bhattacharjee, Ankur Khandelwal, Dalim K Baidya, Mohan Gurjar, Reshu Gupta, Habib Md R Karim
{"title":"Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices in Indian Intensive Care Units: A National Cross-sectional Survey of Intensive Care Unit Consultants.","authors":"Anirban Bhattacharjee, Ankur Khandelwal, Dalim K Baidya, Mohan Gurjar, Reshu Gupta, Habib Md R Karim","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tracheostomy is performed in 10-20% of critically ill patients. Once the underlying indication is resolved, the next critical step is decannulation. There is a paucity of data on decannulation approaches adopted in Indian intensive care units (ICUs). This survey assessed the current tracheostomy decannulation practices in Indian ICUs: \"Respiratory readiness\" for decannulation, use of corking trials or downsizing, pre-decannulation assessments, and post-decannulation care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An online 15-item questionnaire-based survey was conducted among ICU consultants with ≥3 years of post-qualification experience across India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred unique responses were collected across India. The respondents demonstrated marked heterogeneity across all assessed domains. For respiratory readiness, 72% decannulated on minimal oxygen via T-piece or heat and moisture exchanger (HME), whereas 33% withheld decannulation if any oxygen was required. Regarding methodology, 36% performed direct decannulation, 35% employed capping trials, and 28.7% preferred gradual downsizing. Only 59.7% performed routine swallowing assessment decannulation, with clinical bedside evaluation predominating over objective methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is marked practice variation in decannulation approaches and an urgent need for evidence-based decannulation protocols in Indian ICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"30 6","pages":"530-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13407472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Tracheostomy is performed in 10-20% of critically ill patients. Once the underlying indication is resolved, the next critical step is decannulation. There is a paucity of data on decannulation approaches adopted in Indian intensive care units (ICUs). This survey assessed the current tracheostomy decannulation practices in Indian ICUs: "Respiratory readiness" for decannulation, use of corking trials or downsizing, pre-decannulation assessments, and post-decannulation care.

Patients and methods: An online 15-item questionnaire-based survey was conducted among ICU consultants with ≥3 years of post-qualification experience across India.

Results: Three hundred unique responses were collected across India. The respondents demonstrated marked heterogeneity across all assessed domains. For respiratory readiness, 72% decannulated on minimal oxygen via T-piece or heat and moisture exchanger (HME), whereas 33% withheld decannulation if any oxygen was required. Regarding methodology, 36% performed direct decannulation, 35% employed capping trials, and 28.7% preferred gradual downsizing. Only 59.7% performed routine swallowing assessment decannulation, with clinical bedside evaluation predominating over objective methods.

Conclusion: There is marked practice variation in decannulation approaches and an urgent need for evidence-based decannulation protocols in Indian ICUs.

印度重症监护室的气管切开术脱管实践:对重症监护室顾问的全国横断面调查。
背景与目的:10-20%的危重患者行气管切开术。一旦潜在的适应症得到解决,下一个关键步骤是去管术。关于印度重症监护病房(icu)采用的脱管方法的数据缺乏。本调查评估了目前印度icu的气管切开术脱管实践:脱管的“呼吸准备”、使用软木塞试验或缩小、脱管前评估和脱管后护理。患者和方法:对印度各地具有3年以上执业经验的ICU顾问进行了一项15项在线问卷调查。结果:在印度各地收集了300个独特的回复。受访者在所有评估领域都表现出明显的异质性。对于呼吸准备,72%的患者通过t型片或热湿交换器(HME)在低氧条件下进行脱管,而33%的患者在需要氧气时不进行脱管。在方法方面,36%的人采用直接脱管,35%的人采用封顶试验,28.7%的人倾向于逐步缩小套管。只有59.7%的人进行了常规吞咽评估,临床床边评估占主导地位。结论:在印度icu中,去管方式存在明显的实践差异,迫切需要基于证据的去管方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书