Comparison of Remineralization Potential of Different Remineralizing Agents on Carious Lesion of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Q3 Dentistry
Aditi S Oza, Bhagyashree Salunkhe, Raju Umaji Patil, Riddhi S Joshi, Vineet Vinay
{"title":"Comparison of Remineralization Potential of Different Remineralizing Agents on Carious Lesion of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Aditi S Oza, Bhagyashree Salunkhe, Raju Umaji Patil, Riddhi S Joshi, Vineet Vinay","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the remineralization potential of nanohydroxyapatite (nHA), fluoridated nano hydroxyapatite (NHA-F), nanosilver fluoride (NSF), bioactive glass (BAG), nanobioactive glass (nBAG), silver diamine fluoride (SDF), sodium fluoride (NaF), casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and fluoride in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study has included articles from databases such as MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ERIC, and ScienceDirect published until December 31, 2023. The search resulted in the display of 3086 articles, of which 1396 cited as duplicates were eliminated, eventually providing with 15 articles for review after being subjected to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The extracted data were analysed in qualitative and quantitative methods, along with the generation of forest plots using RevMan software version 5. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies were included in the qualitative and 8 in the quantitative synthesis. The nHA vs Naf comparison resulted in pooled value [OR (CI)] 0.01 [95% CI (1.13 to 1.15)] <i>p</i> (0.99) not statistically significant, NSF vs NaF pooled value value [OR (CI)] 0.77 [95% CI (0.13 to 1.42)] <i>p</i> (0.02) was statistically significant, Subgroup analysis BAG and nBAG vs NaF pooled value [OR (CI)] 1.00 [95% CI (0.14 to 1.86)] p(0.02) was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concluded that the newer nanoparticulate and the nonfluoridated remineralizing agents are as effective as or more effective than other agents.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This study highlights the newer agents, such as nanoparticulate and nonfluoridated remineralizing agents' potential in comparison to other commonly used agents, and focuses more on remineralization of primary teeth as a preventive treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"19 6","pages":"770-778"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13408189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To compare the remineralization potential of nanohydroxyapatite (nHA), fluoridated nano hydroxyapatite (NHA-F), nanosilver fluoride (NSF), bioactive glass (BAG), nanobioactive glass (nBAG), silver diamine fluoride (SDF), sodium fluoride (NaF), casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and fluoride in primary teeth.

Materials and methods: This study has included articles from databases such as MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ERIC, and ScienceDirect published until December 31, 2023. The search resulted in the display of 3086 articles, of which 1396 cited as duplicates were eliminated, eventually providing with 15 articles for review after being subjected to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Statistical analysis: The extracted data were analysed in qualitative and quantitative methods, along with the generation of forest plots using RevMan software version 5. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN tool.

Results: 15 studies were included in the qualitative and 8 in the quantitative synthesis. The nHA vs Naf comparison resulted in pooled value [OR (CI)] 0.01 [95% CI (1.13 to 1.15)] p (0.99) not statistically significant, NSF vs NaF pooled value value [OR (CI)] 0.77 [95% CI (0.13 to 1.42)] p (0.02) was statistically significant, Subgroup analysis BAG and nBAG vs NaF pooled value [OR (CI)] 1.00 [95% CI (0.14 to 1.86)] p(0.02) was statistically significant.

Conclusions: This study concluded that the newer nanoparticulate and the nonfluoridated remineralizing agents are as effective as or more effective than other agents.

Key messages: This study highlights the newer agents, such as nanoparticulate and nonfluoridated remineralizing agents' potential in comparison to other commonly used agents, and focuses more on remineralization of primary teeth as a preventive treatment option.

不同再矿化剂对乳牙龋病再矿化电位的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:比较纳米羟基磷灰石(nHA)、氟化纳米羟基磷灰石(nHA - f)、纳米氟化银(NSF)、生物活性玻璃(BAG)、纳米生物活性玻璃(nBAG)、氟化银二胺(SDF)、氟化钠(NaF)、酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)、磷酸三钙(TCP)和氟化物在乳牙中的再矿化电位。材料和方法:本研究纳入了MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、ERIC和ScienceDirect等数据库中截至2023年12月31日发表的文章。检索结果显示3086篇文章,其中重复引用的1396篇被剔除,通过纳入和排除标准后,最终留下15篇文章供审查。统计分析:对提取的数据进行定性和定量分析,并使用RevMan 5版软件生成森林样地。使用QUIN工具评估偏倚风险。结果:定性综合纳入15项研究,定量综合纳入8项研究。nHA与Naf比较合并值[OR (CI)] 0.01 [95% CI (1.13 ~ 1.15)] p(0.99)无统计学意义,NSF与Naf合并值[OR (CI)] 0.77 [95% CI (0.13 ~ 1.42)] p(0.02)有统计学意义,亚组分析BAG与nBAG与Naf合并值[OR (CI)] 1.00 [95% CI (0.14 ~ 1.86)] p(0.02)有统计学意义。结论:本研究得出结论,新型纳米颗粒和无氟再矿化剂与其他药物一样有效或更有效。关键信息:本研究强调了较新的药物,如纳米颗粒和非氟化再矿化剂与其他常用药物相比的潜力,并更多地关注了作为预防治疗选择的乳牙再矿化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书