[Development and validation of a health information-seeking behavior questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases].

Q2 Medicine
Maidiniguli Maitikuerban, Panpan Tang, Yueying Jiang, Yue Zhao, Meijuan Lan, Yuping Zhang, Leiwen Tang
{"title":"[Development and validation of a health information-seeking behavior questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases].","authors":"Maidiniguli Maitikuerban, Panpan Tang, Yueying Jiang, Yue Zhao, Meijuan Lan, Yuping Zhang, Leiwen Tang","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2025-0654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a health information-seeking behavior (HISB) questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases and evaluate its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on Wilson's information behavior model, a pre-liminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, team discussions, two rounds of expert consultations, and a pilot survey. A convenience sample of 368 patients with non-communicable chronic diseases was recruited from medical institutions in Hangzhou, Jinhua, Lishui, Ningbo, Taizhou, and Wenzhou of Zhejiang Province, between March-May 2023 and August-September 2025. The dimension of health information-seeking channels was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Item analysis for the other three dimensions was performed using item-total correlation and critical ratio methods. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability. Content validity was assessed by expert ratings, and structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final question-naire comprised 30 items across four dimensions: health information needs, health information-seeking channels, health information search and acquisition, and health information evaluation. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.970, and the split-half reliability was 0.781. The scale-level content validity index was 0.830, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.890 to 1.000. EFA extracted three common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.181%. CFA indicated a good model fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HISB questionnaire developed in this study demonstrates good reliability and validity. It can serve as a reliable and valid tool to assess HISB among patients with chronic non-communicable diseases, providing a basis for healthcare professionals to develop targeted health education interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"763-773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13598567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2025-0654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a health information-seeking behavior (HISB) questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases and evaluate its reliability and validity.

Methods: Based on Wilson's information behavior model, a pre-liminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, team discussions, two rounds of expert consultations, and a pilot survey. A convenience sample of 368 patients with non-communicable chronic diseases was recruited from medical institutions in Hangzhou, Jinhua, Lishui, Ningbo, Taizhou, and Wenzhou of Zhejiang Province, between March-May 2023 and August-September 2025. The dimension of health information-seeking channels was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Item analysis for the other three dimensions was performed using item-total correlation and critical ratio methods. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability. Content validity was assessed by expert ratings, and structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: The final question-naire comprised 30 items across four dimensions: health information needs, health information-seeking channels, health information search and acquisition, and health information evaluation. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.970, and the split-half reliability was 0.781. The scale-level content validity index was 0.830, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.890 to 1.000. EFA extracted three common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.181%. CFA indicated a good model fit.

Conclusions: The HISB questionnaire developed in this study demonstrates good reliability and validity. It can serve as a reliable and valid tool to assess HISB among patients with chronic non-communicable diseases, providing a basis for healthcare professionals to develop targeted health education interventions.

[慢性病患者健康信息寻求行为问卷的编制与验证]。
目的:编制慢性疾病患者健康信息寻求行为(HISB)问卷,并对其信效度进行评价。方法:以Wilson的信息行为模型为基础,通过文献综述、团队讨论、两轮专家咨询和试点调查,编制初步问卷。本研究于2023年3 - 5月至2025年8 - 9月期间,从浙江省杭州、金华、丽水、宁波、台州和温州的医疗机构中招募了368名慢性疾病患者作为方便样本。采用描述性统计方法对健康信息寻求渠道的维度进行分析。其他三个维度的项目分析使用项目-总相关和临界比率方法进行。信度采用Cronbach′s α系数和劈半信度进行评价。采用专家评分法评估内容效度,采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度。结果:最终问卷包括健康信息需求、健康信息寻求渠道、健康信息搜索与获取、健康信息评价四个维度的30个项目。总体Cronbach’s α系数为0.970,分半信度为0.781。量表级内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.830,项目级内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.890 ~ 1.000。EFA提取了3个共同因子,累积方差贡献率为75.181%。CFA表明模型拟合良好。结论:本研究编制的HISB问卷具有良好的信度和效度。它可以作为评估慢性疾病患者HISB的可靠和有效的工具,为医护人员制定有针对性的健康教育干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书