{"title":"[Development and validation of a health information-seeking behavior questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases].","authors":"Maidiniguli Maitikuerban, Panpan Tang, Yueying Jiang, Yue Zhao, Meijuan Lan, Yuping Zhang, Leiwen Tang","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2025-0654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a health information-seeking behavior (HISB) questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases and evaluate its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on Wilson's information behavior model, a pre-liminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, team discussions, two rounds of expert consultations, and a pilot survey. A convenience sample of 368 patients with non-communicable chronic diseases was recruited from medical institutions in Hangzhou, Jinhua, Lishui, Ningbo, Taizhou, and Wenzhou of Zhejiang Province, between March-May 2023 and August-September 2025. The dimension of health information-seeking channels was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Item analysis for the other three dimensions was performed using item-total correlation and critical ratio methods. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability. Content validity was assessed by expert ratings, and structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final question-naire comprised 30 items across four dimensions: health information needs, health information-seeking channels, health information search and acquisition, and health information evaluation. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.970, and the split-half reliability was 0.781. The scale-level content validity index was 0.830, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.890 to 1.000. EFA extracted three common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.181%. CFA indicated a good model fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HISB questionnaire developed in this study demonstrates good reliability and validity. It can serve as a reliable and valid tool to assess HISB among patients with chronic non-communicable diseases, providing a basis for healthcare professionals to develop targeted health education interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"763-773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13598567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2025-0654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a health information-seeking behavior (HISB) questionnaire for patients with non-communicable chronic diseases and evaluate its reliability and validity.
Methods: Based on Wilson's information behavior model, a pre-liminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, team discussions, two rounds of expert consultations, and a pilot survey. A convenience sample of 368 patients with non-communicable chronic diseases was recruited from medical institutions in Hangzhou, Jinhua, Lishui, Ningbo, Taizhou, and Wenzhou of Zhejiang Province, between March-May 2023 and August-September 2025. The dimension of health information-seeking channels was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Item analysis for the other three dimensions was performed using item-total correlation and critical ratio methods. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability. Content validity was assessed by expert ratings, and structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results: The final question-naire comprised 30 items across four dimensions: health information needs, health information-seeking channels, health information search and acquisition, and health information evaluation. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.970, and the split-half reliability was 0.781. The scale-level content validity index was 0.830, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.890 to 1.000. EFA extracted three common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.181%. CFA indicated a good model fit.
Conclusions: The HISB questionnaire developed in this study demonstrates good reliability and validity. It can serve as a reliable and valid tool to assess HISB among patients with chronic non-communicable diseases, providing a basis for healthcare professionals to develop targeted health education interventions.