HIV PrEP Knowledge and Prescribing Patterns Among Healthcare Providers in Southwestern Pennsylvania.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002382
Benjamin L Hamel, Elizabeth L Klusman, Emma E Seagle Roth, J Ashenayi, Kel L Wilkinson, Harold C Wiesenfeld, Ken S Ho
{"title":"HIV PrEP Knowledge and Prescribing Patterns Among Healthcare Providers in Southwestern Pennsylvania.","authors":"Benjamin L Hamel, Elizabeth L Klusman, Emma E Seagle Roth, J Ashenayi, Kel L Wilkinson, Harold C Wiesenfeld, Ken S Ho","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the proven effectiveness of HIV PrEP, uptake remains suboptimal, and provider-level barriers have been shown to impede implementation. Southwestern Pennsylvania, including Allegheny County, has a high HIV burden, yet limited data exist on regional provider knowledge, comfort, and prescribing practices. This study surveyed healthcare providers across different specialties to identify gaps and modifiable barriers influencing PrEP uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed to healthcare providers across the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from September 2025 to January 2026. The 29-item survey assessed self-assessment of PrEP knowledge, prescribing comfort, likelihood of future prescribing, perceived barriers and facilitators, and provider demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and sixty-seven healthcare providers completed the survey (9.3% response rate). Only 104 (38.9%) providers reported good or better PrEP knowledge, with substantially lower rates for PrEP side effects and monitoring requirements. Based on self-assessment, physicians had significantly higher odds of PrEP knowledge (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence intervals (CI)] = 4.37 [2.27-8.59]), prescribing comfort (OR [95% CI] = 5.84 [2.52-13.51]), and prescribing likelihood (OR [95% CI] = 4.30 [1.66-11.15]) compared with advanced practice providers. Pediatric, obstetrics-gynecology, and emergency medicine providers had significantly lower prescribing likelihood compared with family medicine. The most cited structural barriers were lack of provider training (71.3%) and insufficient clinic protocols (63.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant specialty-specific disparities in PrEP knowledge and prescribing readiness persist. Enhancing provider education, clinical protocols, and structural supports may improve PrEP implementation and strengthen regional HIV prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"740-745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the proven effectiveness of HIV PrEP, uptake remains suboptimal, and provider-level barriers have been shown to impede implementation. Southwestern Pennsylvania, including Allegheny County, has a high HIV burden, yet limited data exist on regional provider knowledge, comfort, and prescribing practices. This study surveyed healthcare providers across different specialties to identify gaps and modifiable barriers influencing PrEP uptake.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to healthcare providers across the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from September 2025 to January 2026. The 29-item survey assessed self-assessment of PrEP knowledge, prescribing comfort, likelihood of future prescribing, perceived barriers and facilitators, and provider demographics.

Results: Two hundred and sixty-seven healthcare providers completed the survey (9.3% response rate). Only 104 (38.9%) providers reported good or better PrEP knowledge, with substantially lower rates for PrEP side effects and monitoring requirements. Based on self-assessment, physicians had significantly higher odds of PrEP knowledge (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence intervals (CI)] = 4.37 [2.27-8.59]), prescribing comfort (OR [95% CI] = 5.84 [2.52-13.51]), and prescribing likelihood (OR [95% CI] = 4.30 [1.66-11.15]) compared with advanced practice providers. Pediatric, obstetrics-gynecology, and emergency medicine providers had significantly lower prescribing likelihood compared with family medicine. The most cited structural barriers were lack of provider training (71.3%) and insufficient clinic protocols (63.3%).

Conclusions: Significant specialty-specific disparities in PrEP knowledge and prescribing readiness persist. Enhancing provider education, clinical protocols, and structural supports may improve PrEP implementation and strengthen regional HIV prevention efforts.

HIV PrEP知识和处方模式在宾夕法尼亚州西南部的医疗保健提供者。
背景:尽管艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的有效性已得到证实,但吸收仍然不是最佳的,并且提供者层面的障碍已被证明阻碍了实施。宾夕法尼亚州西南部,包括阿勒格尼县,有很高的艾滋病毒负担,但关于区域提供者知识、舒适度和处方实践的数据有限。本研究调查了不同专业的医疗保健提供者,以确定影响PrEP吸收的差距和可改变的障碍。方法:从2025年9月到2026年1月,对匹兹堡大学医学中心的医疗服务提供者进行横断面调查。这项包含29个项目的调查评估了PrEP知识、处方舒适性、未来处方的可能性、感知到的障碍和促进因素以及提供者人口统计数据的自我评估。结果:共有267名医护人员完成调查,回复率为9.3%。只有104家(38.9%)提供者报告了良好或更好的PrEP知识,PrEP副作用和监测要求的比例明显较低。基于自我评估,内科医生在PrEP知识(OR [95% CI] = 4.37[2.27-8.59])、处方舒适度(OR [95% CI] = 5.84[2.52-13.51])和处方可能性(OR [95% CI] = 4.30[1.66-11.15])方面均显著高于高级执业医师。与家庭医学相比,儿科、妇产科和急诊医学提供者开处方的可能性明显较低。最常提到的结构性障碍是缺乏提供者培训(71.3%)和诊所协议不足(63.3%)。结论:PrEP知识和处方准备方面存在显著的专科差异。加强提供者教育、临床协议和结构支持可以改善PrEP的实施并加强区域艾滋病毒预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书