Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Admission Status, Intensive Care Requirements, and Mortality in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.40.18
Seyed Mohammad Hosseini Kasnavieh, Seyed Hossien Shaker, Maryam Milanifard, Roxana Hessam, Ali Saghandian Tousi, Marjan Ghadesi
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Admission Status, Intensive Care Requirements, and Mortality in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Hosseini Kasnavieh, Seyed Hossien Shaker, Maryam Milanifard, Roxana Hessam, Ali Saghandian Tousi, Marjan Ghadesi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.40.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting patient outcomes in the emergency department is crucial for effective resource management and enhancing the quality of care. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have facilitated accurate predictions of patient outcomes; however, consistent evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of these models in the emergency department remains limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in predicting admission status, intensive care requirements, and in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2020 to November 2025 using targeted keywords. A total of 34 relevant studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata v.17 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the models for predicting admission were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.93) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95), respectively. For critical care, sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00) and specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00). For mortality, sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence models, encompassing both machine learning and deep learning, serve as effective tools for predicting the conditions of emergency patients. The findings indicate that AI holds significant potential to enhance clinical decision-making within the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"40 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13404239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.40.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting patient outcomes in the emergency department is crucial for effective resource management and enhancing the quality of care. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have facilitated accurate predictions of patient outcomes; however, consistent evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of these models in the emergency department remains limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in predicting admission status, intensive care requirements, and in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.

Methods: In the present study, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2020 to November 2025 using targeted keywords. A total of 34 relevant studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata v.17 software.

Results: The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the models for predicting admission were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.93) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95), respectively. For critical care, sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00) and specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00). For mortality, sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00).

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence models, encompassing both machine learning and deep learning, serve as effective tools for predicting the conditions of emergency patients. The findings indicate that AI holds significant potential to enhance clinical decision-making within the emergency department.

人工智能在预测急诊科入院状况、重症监护需求和死亡率方面的诊断准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:预测急诊科患者的预后对于有效的资源管理和提高护理质量至关重要。人工智能的最新进展促进了对患者预后的准确预测;然而,关于这些模型在急诊科的诊断准确性的一致证据仍然有限。因此,本研究的目的是评估人工智能在预测急诊科住院状态、重症监护需求和住院死亡率方面的诊断准确性。方法:在本研究中,使用目标关键词检索2020年1月至2025年11月期间的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库。共纳入34项相关研究。采用Stata v.17软件进行meta分析。结果:预测入院的模型的总体诊断敏感性和特异性分别为0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.93)和0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95)。对于重症监护,敏感性为0.85 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00),特异性为0.86 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00)。对于死亡率,敏感性为0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00),特异性为0.90 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00)。结论:包括机器学习和深度学习在内的人工智能模型是预测急诊患者病情的有效工具。研究结果表明,人工智能在加强急诊科的临床决策方面具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书