Toward Structured Transparency: A Governance Framework for AI Use in Biomedical Publishing.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jong-Min Kim
{"title":"Toward Structured Transparency: A Governance Framework for AI Use in Biomedical Publishing.","authors":"Jong-Min Kim","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid adoption of large language models and generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming biomedical research and publishing. Although international organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) have established the principle that AI cannot be recognized as an author, and the ICMJE, in its January 2026 revision, has introduced a dedicated section addressing AI use by authors, peer reviewers, and editors, journal-level Instructions for Authors still require further operational detail to apply these principles consistently throughout the publication process. This review critically examines current AI-related policies in the <i>Journal of Korean Medical Science</i> (<i>JKMS</i>) and the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE) and identifies three major challenges: the practical limitations of the AI non-authorship principle, the inadequacy of current AI disclosure practices, and the emergence of AI-specific conflicts of interest that extends beyond conventional financial disclosures. We argue that medical publishing should move from a restrictive approach toward a framework of structured transparency that systematically documents, evaluates, and verifies AI use. To achieve this goal, we propose a practical governance framework that includes a three-tiered AI disclosure system, strengthened accountability for corresponding authors, expanded institutional conflict-of-interest disclosures, transparent reporting of AI use by peer reviewers, and formal editorial policies governing AI-assisted editorial activities. Future revisions of the KAMJE and <i>JKMS Instructions for Authors</i> should prioritize transparent and accountable AI governance rather than restricting AI use. Adoption of a structured, publication-wide framework encompassing authors, peer reviewers, and editors would strengthen research integrity while supporting the responsible integration of AI into biomedical publishing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"41 29","pages":"e318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13406945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid adoption of large language models and generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming biomedical research and publishing. Although international organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) have established the principle that AI cannot be recognized as an author, and the ICMJE, in its January 2026 revision, has introduced a dedicated section addressing AI use by authors, peer reviewers, and editors, journal-level Instructions for Authors still require further operational detail to apply these principles consistently throughout the publication process. This review critically examines current AI-related policies in the Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) and the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE) and identifies three major challenges: the practical limitations of the AI non-authorship principle, the inadequacy of current AI disclosure practices, and the emergence of AI-specific conflicts of interest that extends beyond conventional financial disclosures. We argue that medical publishing should move from a restrictive approach toward a framework of structured transparency that systematically documents, evaluates, and verifies AI use. To achieve this goal, we propose a practical governance framework that includes a three-tiered AI disclosure system, strengthened accountability for corresponding authors, expanded institutional conflict-of-interest disclosures, transparent reporting of AI use by peer reviewers, and formal editorial policies governing AI-assisted editorial activities. Future revisions of the KAMJE and JKMS Instructions for Authors should prioritize transparent and accountable AI governance rather than restricting AI use. Adoption of a structured, publication-wide framework encompassing authors, peer reviewers, and editors would strengthen research integrity while supporting the responsible integration of AI into biomedical publishing.

迈向结构化透明:生物医学出版中人工智能使用的治理框架。
大型语言模型和生成式人工智能(AI)的迅速采用正在改变生物医学研究和出版。尽管国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)和出版伦理委员会(COPE)等国际组织已经确立了人工智能不能被视为作者的原则,ICMJE在其2026年1月的修订版中引入了一个专门的章节,讨论作者、同行评议人和编辑使用人工智能的问题,期刊级别的作者指南仍然需要进一步的操作细节,以便在整个出版过程中始终如一地应用这些原则。本综述批判性地审查了《韩国医学科学杂志》(JKMS)和韩国医学期刊编辑协会(KAMJE)当前的人工智能相关政策,并确定了三个主要挑战:人工智能非作者原则的实际局限性、当前人工智能披露实践的不足,以及人工智能特定利益冲突的出现,超出了传统的财务披露。我们认为,医学出版应该从限制性方法转向结构化透明框架,系统地记录、评估和验证人工智能的使用。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一个实用的治理框架,其中包括一个三层人工智能披露系统,加强对通讯作者的问责制,扩大机构利益冲突披露,同行审稿人使用人工智能的透明报告,以及管理人工智能辅助编辑活动的正式编辑政策。KAMJE和JKMS作者指南的未来修订应优先考虑透明和负责任的人工智能治理,而不是限制人工智能的使用。采用包含作者、同行评审和编辑的结构化出版范围框架将加强研究的完整性,同时支持将人工智能负责任地整合到生物医学出版中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书