Interval timing and animal communication.

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-29 DOI:10.1242/jeb.251731
Carlos A Rodriguez-Saltos, Jadyn E Scott
{"title":"Interval timing and animal communication.","authors":"Carlos A Rodriguez-Saltos, Jadyn E Scott","doi":"10.1242/jeb.251731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals time durations between arbitrary events to make predictions about their environment. This ability, known as interval timing, has been studied in the context of reward expectancy in the laboratory and foraging in the wild. However, timing is also used in other contexts, such as in animal communication. Communication signals have characteristic timing, which affects the sender's likelihood of attracting mates, fending off rivals and deterring eavesdroppers. The literature on timing in reward expectancy and communication is extensive, but there is little crossover between the two fields. Here, we review this literature while highlighting the neural mechanisms that may be shared between the two modes of timing. We focus our comparison on learned communication signals, such as birdsong, given that learning is also a crucial component of reward expectancy. However, we also argue that even the study of innate communication signals could shed light on the nature of the neural oscillators that animals use to keep track of time. We also highlight potential differences between interval and communication timing. We argue that timing precision might be particularly important in communication, as precision can be an honest indicator of quality. However, increased precision might occur at a cost to the range of intervals that can be produced in a signal. Thus, communication signals provide an opportunity to study the physiological constraints that limit the precision and range at which neurons can sustain rhythms to either produce rhythmic behavior or keep track of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":"229 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.251731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals time durations between arbitrary events to make predictions about their environment. This ability, known as interval timing, has been studied in the context of reward expectancy in the laboratory and foraging in the wild. However, timing is also used in other contexts, such as in animal communication. Communication signals have characteristic timing, which affects the sender's likelihood of attracting mates, fending off rivals and deterring eavesdroppers. The literature on timing in reward expectancy and communication is extensive, but there is little crossover between the two fields. Here, we review this literature while highlighting the neural mechanisms that may be shared between the two modes of timing. We focus our comparison on learned communication signals, such as birdsong, given that learning is also a crucial component of reward expectancy. However, we also argue that even the study of innate communication signals could shed light on the nature of the neural oscillators that animals use to keep track of time. We also highlight potential differences between interval and communication timing. We argue that timing precision might be particularly important in communication, as precision can be an honest indicator of quality. However, increased precision might occur at a cost to the range of intervals that can be produced in a signal. Thus, communication signals provide an opportunity to study the physiological constraints that limit the precision and range at which neurons can sustain rhythms to either produce rhythmic behavior or keep track of time.

间隔计时和动物交流。
动物根据任意事件之间的时间间隔来预测它们所处的环境。这种能力,被称为间隔时间,已经在实验室的奖励预期和野外觅食的背景下进行了研究。然而,计时也用于其他场合,比如动物交流。通信信号具有特有的时间特征,这影响了发送者吸引配偶、击退对手和阻止窃听者的可能性。关于奖励预期和沟通中的时机的文献很多,但这两个领域之间很少有交叉。在这里,我们回顾了这些文献,同时强调了两种计时模式之间可能共享的神经机制。我们将比较重点放在习得的交流信号上,比如鸟鸣,因为学习也是奖励预期的一个重要组成部分。然而,我们也认为,即使是对先天交流信号的研究,也可以揭示动物用来记录时间的神经振荡器的本质。我们还强调了间隔时间和通信时间之间的潜在差异。我们认为,在通信中,定时精度可能特别重要,因为精度可以是质量的可靠指标。然而,精确度的提高可能是以牺牲信号中产生的区间范围为代价的。因此,通信信号提供了一个研究生理约束的机会,这些约束限制了神经元维持节奏的精度和范围,从而产生有节奏的行为或跟踪时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书