A nationwide survey on attitudes of obstetricians and gynecologists toward comprehensive prenatal genetic testing in Japan

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Yuka Shibata, Takahiro Yamada, Nahoko Shirato, Akihiko Sekizawa, Aiko Sasaki, Kenichiro Hata, Yuko Masuzawa, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Hiroshi Yoshihashi, Kanako Koike Fukushima, Hideaki Masuzaki, Kenjiro Kosaki, Shiro Tanaka, Ikuo Konishi, Shigehito Yamada, Masakazu Nishigaki, Hidehiko Miyake
{"title":"A nationwide survey on attitudes of obstetricians and gynecologists toward comprehensive prenatal genetic testing in Japan","authors":"Yuka Shibata, Takahiro Yamada, Nahoko Shirato, Akihiko Sekizawa, Aiko Sasaki, Kenichiro Hata, Yuko Masuzawa, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Hiroshi Yoshihashi, Kanako Koike Fukushima, Hideaki Masuzaki, Kenjiro Kosaki, Shiro Tanaka, Ikuo Konishi, Shigehito Yamada, Masakazu Nishigaki, Hidehiko Miyake","doi":"10.1038/s10038-026-01496-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing expands the range of conditions that can be diagnosed before birth. However, its appropriate use requires a high genetic literacy level. This study aimed to identify challenges associated with the clinical implementation of comprehensive prenatal genetic testing in Japan through a survey of obstetricians and gynecologists. A total of 663 obstetricians and gynecologists (response rate: 34.6%) affiliated with facilities providing intrapartum care nationwide participated. The mean duration of clinical experience was 26.9 years, and 85% had experience performing prenatal genetic testing. Regarding diagnostic testing using chromosomal microarray analysis or whole-exome sequencing, 5% responded that it was “already implemented,” whereas 47% responded that they were “unsure whether implementation should be considered.” For non-invasive prenatal testing targeting conditions beyond trisomies 21, 18, and 13, 63% were “positive about implementation.” Clinical geneticists or obstetricians and gynecologists certified in perinatal genetics were significantly more likely to cite restricting testing at non-certified institutions as a reason for supporting implementation (p < 0.01). Few obstetricians and gynecologists certified in perinatal genetics cited “to avoid unnecessary invasive diagnostic testing” (p = 0.02) and “to improve the child’s prognosis” (p < 0.01). Therefore, obstetricians and gynecologists certified in perinatal genetics were more likely to cite social issues, such as the presence of non-certified facilities, whereas fewer cited avoiding invasive diagnostic testing or improving child outcomes. As comprehensive prenatal testing is implemented, further investigation into the factors underlying these perceptions, together with ongoing education and awareness initiatives regarding the benefits and values of prenatal genetic testing, including NIPT, will be important.","PeriodicalId":16077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Genetics","volume":"71 10","pages":"669-675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s10038-026-01496-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing expands the range of conditions that can be diagnosed before birth. However, its appropriate use requires a high genetic literacy level. This study aimed to identify challenges associated with the clinical implementation of comprehensive prenatal genetic testing in Japan through a survey of obstetricians and gynecologists. A total of 663 obstetricians and gynecologists (response rate: 34.6%) affiliated with facilities providing intrapartum care nationwide participated. The mean duration of clinical experience was 26.9 years, and 85% had experience performing prenatal genetic testing. Regarding diagnostic testing using chromosomal microarray analysis or whole-exome sequencing, 5% responded that it was “already implemented,” whereas 47% responded that they were “unsure whether implementation should be considered.” For non-invasive prenatal testing targeting conditions beyond trisomies 21, 18, and 13, 63% were “positive about implementation.” Clinical geneticists or obstetricians and gynecologists certified in perinatal genetics were significantly more likely to cite restricting testing at non-certified institutions as a reason for supporting implementation (p < 0.01). Few obstetricians and gynecologists certified in perinatal genetics cited “to avoid unnecessary invasive diagnostic testing” (p = 0.02) and “to improve the child’s prognosis” (p < 0.01). Therefore, obstetricians and gynecologists certified in perinatal genetics were more likely to cite social issues, such as the presence of non-certified facilities, whereas fewer cited avoiding invasive diagnostic testing or improving child outcomes. As comprehensive prenatal testing is implemented, further investigation into the factors underlying these perceptions, together with ongoing education and awareness initiatives regarding the benefits and values of prenatal genetic testing, including NIPT, will be important.
一项关于日本妇产科医生对全面产前基因检测态度的全国性调查。
全面的产前基因检测扩大了可在出生前诊断的疾病范围。然而,它的适当使用需要较高的遗传素养水平。本研究旨在通过对日本产科医生和妇科医生的调查,确定与临床实施全面产前基因检测相关的挑战。全国共有663名产时护理机构的妇产科医生参与调查,回复率为34.6%。平均临床经验为26.9年,85%有产前基因检测经验。关于使用染色体微阵列分析或全外显子组测序的诊断测试,5%的人回答“已经实施”,而47%的人回答“不确定是否应该考虑实施”。对于针对21、18和13三体以外疾病的非侵入性产前检测,63%的人“对实施持积极态度”。临床遗传学家或围产期遗传学认证的妇产科医生明显更有可能引用在非认证机构限制检测作为支持实施的理由
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Genetics
Journal of Human Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Genetics is an international journal publishing articles on human genetics, including medical genetics and human genome analysis. It covers all aspects of human genetics, including molecular genetics, clinical genetics, behavioral genetics, immunogenetics, pharmacogenomics, population genetics, functional genomics, epigenetics, genetic counseling and gene therapy. Articles on the following areas are especially welcome: genetic factors of monogenic and complex disorders, genome-wide association studies, genetic epidemiology, cancer genetics, personal genomics, genotype-phenotype relationships and genome diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书