Soft-Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Clinical Periodontology Pub Date : 2026-09-16 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1111/jcpe.70177
Louiza Papantonatou, Leonidas Batas, Antigoni Delantoni, Eleutherios Anagnostou, Ioannis Vouros
{"title":"Soft-Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix","authors":"Louiza Papantonatou,&nbsp;Leonidas Batas,&nbsp;Antigoni Delantoni,&nbsp;Eleutherios Anagnostou,&nbsp;Ioannis Vouros","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, histological and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) during implant placement in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this three-arm randomised controlled trial, 25 patients were allocated to VCMX, SCTG, or no augmentation (control). Soft-tissue thickness (STT) was assessed by ultrasonography, and buccal bone thickness (BBT) by CBCT, at baseline and 6 months. Clinical parameters, PROMs and histological findings were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed at the patient level using repeated-measures general linear models, accounting for within-subject variability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both VCMX and SCTG resulted in significant increases in STT compared with control (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Numerically greater STT gains were observed in the VCMX group. BBT decreased significantly over time in all groups, with no significant differences between treatments. PROMs were comparable, although CTG was associated with slightly higher morbidity. Histological analysis showed favourable integration of both grafting materials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling. Within the study limitations, both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06622759; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622759)</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"53 10","pages":"1585-1595"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcpe.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.70177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, histological and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) during implant placement in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX).

Materials and Methods

In this three-arm randomised controlled trial, 25 patients were allocated to VCMX, SCTG, or no augmentation (control). Soft-tissue thickness (STT) was assessed by ultrasonography, and buccal bone thickness (BBT) by CBCT, at baseline and 6 months. Clinical parameters, PROMs and histological findings were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed at the patient level using repeated-measures general linear models, accounting for within-subject variability.

Results

Both VCMX and SCTG resulted in significant increases in STT compared with control (p < 0.001). Numerically greater STT gains were observed in the VCMX group. BBT decreased significantly over time in all groups, with no significant differences between treatments. PROMs were comparable, although CTG was associated with slightly higher morbidity. Histological analysis showed favourable integration of both grafting materials.

Conclusion

STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling. Within the study limitations, both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm these findings.

Trial Registration

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06622759; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622759)

在美学区植入植入期间的软组织增强:使用结缔组织移植物和体积稳定的胶原基质的随机对照试验的临床、放射学、组织学和患者报告的结果
目的评估使用结缔组织移植物(CTG)或体积稳定的胶原基质(VCMX)在美观区植入软组织增强(STA)期间的临床、影像学、组织学和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。材料和方法在这项三组随机对照试验中,25例患者被分配到VCMX、SCTG或无增强(对照组)组。在基线和6个月时,用超声检查评估软组织厚度(STT),用CBCT评估颊骨厚度(BBT)。记录临床参数、PROMs及组织学表现。采用重复测量一般线性模型在患者水平上进行统计分析,考虑受试者内部的可变性。结果与对照组相比,VCMX和SCTG均导致STT显著增加(p < 0.001)。数值上,VCMX组观察到更大的STT增益。随着时间的推移,所有组的BBT都显著下降,治疗之间没有显著差异。PROMs具有可比性,尽管CTG的发病率略高。组织学分析显示两种嫁接材料的良好整合。结论STA可显著增加STT,但不影响颊骨重塑。在研究限制范围内,与不进行强化相比,两种强化方法都与STT增加有关。需要进一步精心设计的研究来证实这些发现。本研究在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06622759; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622759)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书