Ross D. Stewart, Kate H. J. Perez, Paul D. N. Hebert, Mamadi Theresa Sethusa, Michelle van der Bank, T. Jonathan Davies
{"title":"Plant Phylogenetic History, Not Diversity, Drives Insect Biodiversity Across South Africa's Biomes","authors":"Ross D. Stewart, Kate H. J. Perez, Paul D. N. Hebert, Mamadi Theresa Sethusa, Michelle van der Bank, T. Jonathan Davies","doi":"10.1111/geb.70283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Insects provide essential ecosystem services, but there is a concern that insect abundance is in rapid decline. Identifying trends in insect biodiversity is challenging because we lack baseline data for most biogeographic regions, and most insect species remain undescribed. Here, we aim to report the first nationwide inventory of insect biodiversity in South Africa.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven National Botanical Gardens representing four major South African biomes: Savanna, Grassland, Fynbos and Albany Thicket.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Sampling from 1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Insects (Arthropods) and vascular plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We deployed two Malaise traps per botanical garden and used DNA barcoding to identify insect specimens. We reconstructed phylogenies for insect molecular clusters (BINs) and 12,149 vascular plant species. Insect and plant community structure were compared using dissimilarity metrics and Mantel tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We generated DNA barcodes for 337,809 specimens, representing 29,919 unique molecular clusters, as species proxies. We estimated that the true richness of above ground insect biodiversity in South Africa may be closer to 100,000 species, yet 97% of barcoded taxa could not be assigned to species level. At current rates of taxonomic description, formally cataloguing this dark diversity would take more than 200 years. Estimated insect species richness varied strongly among biomes, with higher insect diversity in the Savanna biome than the floristically rich Fynbos. Turnover in plant lineages was associated with insect community turnover, particularly insect herbivores and predators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We show that plant species richness alone is a poor predictor of insect species richness, with biome-specific factors playing an important role in shaping insect richness gradients. However, turnover in plant lineages was a strong predictor of insect compositional differences between gardens. Our study provides both critical baseline data on insect diversity in South Africa and new insights into the ecological and evolutionary drivers of insect biodiversity gradients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"35 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Insects provide essential ecosystem services, but there is a concern that insect abundance is in rapid decline. Identifying trends in insect biodiversity is challenging because we lack baseline data for most biogeographic regions, and most insect species remain undescribed. Here, we aim to report the first nationwide inventory of insect biodiversity in South Africa.
Location
Eleven National Botanical Gardens representing four major South African biomes: Savanna, Grassland, Fynbos and Albany Thicket.
Time Period
Sampling from 1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023.
Major Taxa Studied
Insects (Arthropods) and vascular plants.
Methods
We deployed two Malaise traps per botanical garden and used DNA barcoding to identify insect specimens. We reconstructed phylogenies for insect molecular clusters (BINs) and 12,149 vascular plant species. Insect and plant community structure were compared using dissimilarity metrics and Mantel tests.
Results
We generated DNA barcodes for 337,809 specimens, representing 29,919 unique molecular clusters, as species proxies. We estimated that the true richness of above ground insect biodiversity in South Africa may be closer to 100,000 species, yet 97% of barcoded taxa could not be assigned to species level. At current rates of taxonomic description, formally cataloguing this dark diversity would take more than 200 years. Estimated insect species richness varied strongly among biomes, with higher insect diversity in the Savanna biome than the floristically rich Fynbos. Turnover in plant lineages was associated with insect community turnover, particularly insect herbivores and predators.
Main Conclusions
We show that plant species richness alone is a poor predictor of insect species richness, with biome-specific factors playing an important role in shaping insect richness gradients. However, turnover in plant lineages was a strong predictor of insect compositional differences between gardens. Our study provides both critical baseline data on insect diversity in South Africa and new insights into the ecological and evolutionary drivers of insect biodiversity gradients.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.