Plant Phylogenetic History, Not Diversity, Drives Insect Biodiversity Across South Africa's Biomes

IF 6.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ross D. Stewart, Kate H. J. Perez, Paul D. N. Hebert, Mamadi Theresa Sethusa, Michelle van der Bank, T. Jonathan Davies
{"title":"Plant Phylogenetic History, Not Diversity, Drives Insect Biodiversity Across South Africa's Biomes","authors":"Ross D. Stewart,&nbsp;Kate H. J. Perez,&nbsp;Paul D. N. Hebert,&nbsp;Mamadi Theresa Sethusa,&nbsp;Michelle van der Bank,&nbsp;T. Jonathan Davies","doi":"10.1111/geb.70283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Insects provide essential ecosystem services, but there is a concern that insect abundance is in rapid decline. Identifying trends in insect biodiversity is challenging because we lack baseline data for most biogeographic regions, and most insect species remain undescribed. Here, we aim to report the first nationwide inventory of insect biodiversity in South Africa.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven National Botanical Gardens representing four major South African biomes: Savanna, Grassland, Fynbos and Albany Thicket.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Sampling from 1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Insects (Arthropods) and vascular plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We deployed two Malaise traps per botanical garden and used DNA barcoding to identify insect specimens. We reconstructed phylogenies for insect molecular clusters (BINs) and 12,149 vascular plant species. Insect and plant community structure were compared using dissimilarity metrics and Mantel tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We generated DNA barcodes for 337,809 specimens, representing 29,919 unique molecular clusters, as species proxies. We estimated that the true richness of above ground insect biodiversity in South Africa may be closer to 100,000 species, yet 97% of barcoded taxa could not be assigned to species level. At current rates of taxonomic description, formally cataloguing this dark diversity would take more than 200 years. Estimated insect species richness varied strongly among biomes, with higher insect diversity in the Savanna biome than the floristically rich Fynbos. Turnover in plant lineages was associated with insect community turnover, particularly insect herbivores and predators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We show that plant species richness alone is a poor predictor of insect species richness, with biome-specific factors playing an important role in shaping insect richness gradients. However, turnover in plant lineages was a strong predictor of insect compositional differences between gardens. Our study provides both critical baseline data on insect diversity in South Africa and new insights into the ecological and evolutionary drivers of insect biodiversity gradients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"35 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Insects provide essential ecosystem services, but there is a concern that insect abundance is in rapid decline. Identifying trends in insect biodiversity is challenging because we lack baseline data for most biogeographic regions, and most insect species remain undescribed. Here, we aim to report the first nationwide inventory of insect biodiversity in South Africa.

Location

Eleven National Botanical Gardens representing four major South African biomes: Savanna, Grassland, Fynbos and Albany Thicket.

Time Period

Sampling from 1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023.

Major Taxa Studied

Insects (Arthropods) and vascular plants.

Methods

We deployed two Malaise traps per botanical garden and used DNA barcoding to identify insect specimens. We reconstructed phylogenies for insect molecular clusters (BINs) and 12,149 vascular plant species. Insect and plant community structure were compared using dissimilarity metrics and Mantel tests.

Results

We generated DNA barcodes for 337,809 specimens, representing 29,919 unique molecular clusters, as species proxies. We estimated that the true richness of above ground insect biodiversity in South Africa may be closer to 100,000 species, yet 97% of barcoded taxa could not be assigned to species level. At current rates of taxonomic description, formally cataloguing this dark diversity would take more than 200 years. Estimated insect species richness varied strongly among biomes, with higher insect diversity in the Savanna biome than the floristically rich Fynbos. Turnover in plant lineages was associated with insect community turnover, particularly insect herbivores and predators.

Main Conclusions

We show that plant species richness alone is a poor predictor of insect species richness, with biome-specific factors playing an important role in shaping insect richness gradients. However, turnover in plant lineages was a strong predictor of insect compositional differences between gardens. Our study provides both critical baseline data on insect diversity in South Africa and new insights into the ecological and evolutionary drivers of insect biodiversity gradients.

Abstract Image

植物系统发展史,而不是多样性,推动了南非生物群落的昆虫生物多样性
目的昆虫提供了重要的生态系统服务,但人们担心昆虫的丰度正在迅速下降。确定昆虫生物多样性的趋势具有挑战性,因为我们缺乏大多数生物地理区域的基线数据,而且大多数昆虫物种仍未被描述。在这里,我们的目标是报告南非第一个全国性的昆虫生物多样性清单。11个国家植物园代表南非四大生物群落:稀树草原、草原、芬博斯和奥尔巴尼灌丛。采样时间为2022年2月1日至2023年1月31日。昆虫(节肢动物)和维管植物的主要分类群。方法在每个植物园设置2个昆虫诱捕器,采用DNA条形码技术对昆虫标本进行鉴定。我们重建了昆虫分子簇(bin)和12149种维管植物的系统发育。采用差异度量和Mantel试验对昆虫和植物群落结构进行了比较。结果我们生成了337,809个标本的DNA条形码,代表了29,919个独特的分子簇,作为物种代理。我们估计南非地上昆虫生物多样性的真实丰富度可能接近10万种,但97%的条形码分类群无法分配到物种水平。按照目前分类描述的速度,正式编目这种黑暗的多样性将需要200多年的时间。昆虫物种丰富度在不同生物群系间差异较大,热带稀树草原生物群系的昆虫多样性高于植物种类丰富的芬波斯地区。植物世系更替与昆虫群落更替有关,尤其是昆虫食草动物和捕食者。研究结果表明,植物物种丰富度是昆虫物种丰富度的一个较差的预测因子,生物群系特异性因子在昆虫丰富度梯度的形成中起重要作用。然而,植物世系的更替是花园间昆虫组成差异的一个强有力的预测因子。我们的研究既提供了南非昆虫多样性的关键基线数据,也为昆虫多样性梯度的生态和进化驱动因素提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书