Body appreciation and psychosocial indicators in patients with keloids, hypertrophic scars, and burn scars.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2026-07-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20595131261468100
Luciana Nacif da Costa Valle, Vanessa Borges Mendes, Ana Paula Melchiors Stahlschmidt, Fernando Ribeiro Andrade, Marcio Roberto Silva, Gisele Viana de Oliveira
{"title":"Body appreciation and psychosocial indicators in patients with keloids, hypertrophic scars, and burn scars.","authors":"Luciana Nacif da Costa Valle, Vanessa Borges Mendes, Ana Paula Melchiors Stahlschmidt, Fernando Ribeiro Andrade, Marcio Roberto Silva, Gisele Viana de Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/20595131261468100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Scars present repercussions beyond physical appearance, affecting emotional well-being and social interactions. Few studies have compared how different scar types, including keloids (K), hypertrophic scars (HS), and post-burn scars (BS), relate to psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess body appreciation and screening indicators of anxiety and depression in patients with scars of different etiologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study including 42 patients with scars allocated to three groups: K, HS, and BS. Body image perception was measured using the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS), and anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Mean BAS and HADS scores were compared across groups, and associations with clinical features were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms increased descriptively from HS (0%) to K (5.9%) to BS (20%) (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Higher odds of combined anxiety and depression symptoms were associated with facial involvement (<i>p</i> = 0.017; OR = 19.8, 95% CI 1.70-229.65), and functional impairment (<i>p</i> = 0.039; OR = 18.0, 95% CI 1.59-202.95) features more frequent among burn patients, although confidence intervals were wide. BAS scores did not differ significantly among groups (<i>p</i> = 0.78), indicating moderate-to-high body appreciation across scar types (mean BAS: 3.68 burns, 3.77 hypertrophic, 3.85 keloids). Anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.57) and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.43) scores were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different scar types were associated with broadly similar psychosocial outcomes. Emotional vulnerability among patients with burn scars appears more closely related to scar-related features, such as facial location and functional impairment, than to scar etiology alone. Findings should be interpreted cautiously and regarded as hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>This study examined how different types of scars, including burns, hypertrophic scars, and keloids, may affect emotional well-being and body image. Adults with these scars completed questionnaires assessing body appreciation, anxiety, and depression. Overall, levels of body appreciation were similar across groups, suggesting that many people can adapt to visible or symptomatic scars over time.Participants with burn scars showed a tendency toward higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. However, these emotional difficulties were more strongly associated with features such as facial involvement and functional limitations than with the type of scar itself. This highlights the importance of considering the broader clinical and social context in which scars occur.As this was an initial study with a relatively small number of participants, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory rather than definitive conclusions. Overall, the results suggest that while many people adapt well to scars, those accompanied by greater visibility or functional impact may be linked to emotional vulnerability. Comprehensive scar management should therefore address not only physical and psychological support but also promote recovery that considers the person as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":94205,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":"12 ","pages":"20595131261468100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13400918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131261468100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Scars present repercussions beyond physical appearance, affecting emotional well-being and social interactions. Few studies have compared how different scar types, including keloids (K), hypertrophic scars (HS), and post-burn scars (BS), relate to psychosocial outcomes.

Objective: Assess body appreciation and screening indicators of anxiety and depression in patients with scars of different etiologies.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study including 42 patients with scars allocated to three groups: K, HS, and BS. Body image perception was measured using the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS), and anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Mean BAS and HADS scores were compared across groups, and associations with clinical features were explored.

Results: The combined prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms increased descriptively from HS (0%) to K (5.9%) to BS (20%) (p = 0.11). Higher odds of combined anxiety and depression symptoms were associated with facial involvement (p = 0.017; OR = 19.8, 95% CI 1.70-229.65), and functional impairment (p = 0.039; OR = 18.0, 95% CI 1.59-202.95) features more frequent among burn patients, although confidence intervals were wide. BAS scores did not differ significantly among groups (p = 0.78), indicating moderate-to-high body appreciation across scar types (mean BAS: 3.68 burns, 3.77 hypertrophic, 3.85 keloids). Anxiety (p = 0.57) and depression (p = 0.43) scores were similar.

Conclusion: Different scar types were associated with broadly similar psychosocial outcomes. Emotional vulnerability among patients with burn scars appears more closely related to scar-related features, such as facial location and functional impairment, than to scar etiology alone. Findings should be interpreted cautiously and regarded as hypothesis-generating.

Lay summary: This study examined how different types of scars, including burns, hypertrophic scars, and keloids, may affect emotional well-being and body image. Adults with these scars completed questionnaires assessing body appreciation, anxiety, and depression. Overall, levels of body appreciation were similar across groups, suggesting that many people can adapt to visible or symptomatic scars over time.Participants with burn scars showed a tendency toward higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. However, these emotional difficulties were more strongly associated with features such as facial involvement and functional limitations than with the type of scar itself. This highlights the importance of considering the broader clinical and social context in which scars occur.As this was an initial study with a relatively small number of participants, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory rather than definitive conclusions. Overall, the results suggest that while many people adapt well to scars, those accompanied by greater visibility or functional impact may be linked to emotional vulnerability. Comprehensive scar management should therefore address not only physical and psychological support but also promote recovery that considers the person as a whole.

瘢痕疙瘩、增生性疤痕和烧伤疤痕患者的身体欣赏和心理社会指标。
简介:伤疤的影响不仅局限于外表,还会影响情感健康和社会交往。很少有研究比较不同类型的疤痕,包括瘢痕疙瘩(K)、肥厚性疤痕(HS)和烧伤后疤痕(BS)与社会心理结局的关系。目的:探讨不同病因瘢痕患者的身体欣赏及焦虑抑郁筛查指标。方法:我们进行了一项探索性横断面研究,将42例瘢痕患者分为三组:K组、HS组和BS组。采用身体欣赏量表(BAS)测量身体形象感知,采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估焦虑和抑郁。比较各组的BAS和HADS平均评分,并探讨其与临床特征的关系。结果:焦虑和抑郁症状的联合患病率从HS(0%)到K(5.9%)再到BS(20%)呈描述性增加(p = 0.11)。合并焦虑和抑郁症状的较高几率与面部受损伤相关(p = 0.017; OR = 19.8, 95% CI 1.70-229.65),而功能损害(p = 0.039; OR = 18.0, 95% CI 1.59-202.95)的特征在烧伤患者中更为常见,尽管置信区间很宽。各组之间的BAS评分无显著差异(p = 0.78),表明不同疤痕类型的身体评分为中至高(平均BAS: 3.68烧伤,3.77肥厚,3.85瘢痕疙瘩)。焦虑(p = 0.57)和抑郁(p = 0.43)得分相似。结论:不同疤痕类型与大体相似的社会心理结局相关。烧伤疤痕患者的情绪脆弱性似乎与疤痕相关的特征,如面部位置和功能损害,而不仅仅是疤痕的病因密切相关。研究结果应谨慎解释,并视为假设生成。摘要:这项研究调查了不同类型的疤痕,包括烧伤、增生性疤痕和瘢痕疙瘩,是如何影响情绪健康和身体形象的。有这些伤疤的成年人完成了评估身体欣赏、焦虑和抑郁的问卷。总体而言,各组对身体的欣赏程度相似,这表明随着时间的推移,许多人可以适应可见的或有症状的伤疤。有烧伤疤痕的参与者表现出更高程度的焦虑和抑郁症状。然而,这些情绪障碍与面部受累和功能限制等特征的关系比疤痕本身的类型更密切。这突出了考虑疤痕发生的更广泛的临床和社会背景的重要性。由于这是一项初步研究,参与者人数相对较少,因此研究结果应被解释为探索性结论,而不是决定性结论。总的来说,结果表明,虽然很多人很好地适应了伤疤,但那些伴随着更明显或功能影响的伤疤可能与情感脆弱有关。因此,全面的疤痕管理不仅要解决身体和心理上的支持,还要促进康复,把人作为一个整体来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书