Lucas Nascimento Diniz Teixeira, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro Cabral, Alexandre de Holanda Cavalcanti Pinto, Tatiana Cristina Manzi Sena, Joaquim de Oliveira Borba Junior, Maria Carolina Romeiro Figueirôa Benício Coelho, Frederico Castelo Branco Cavalcanti
{"title":"Case Report: Falsely Elevated Tacrolimus Concentrations in a Kidney Transplant Recipient","authors":"Lucas Nascimento Diniz Teixeira, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro Cabral, Alexandre de Holanda Cavalcanti Pinto, Tatiana Cristina Manzi Sena, Joaquim de Oliveira Borba Junior, Maria Carolina Romeiro Figueirôa Benício Coelho, Frederico Castelo Branco Cavalcanti","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2026.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tacrolimus (TAC) is a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation but has a narrow therapeutic window, requiring strict therapeutic drug monitoring. Several analytical methods are available for serum concentration measurement and methodological interference may lead to clinically misleading results. We report the case of a 67-year-old female kidney transplant recipient who presented with persistently elevated tacrolimus concentrations despite drug discontinuation. TAC concentrations were initially measured using the affinity column–mediated immunoassay (ACMIA), showing markedly supratherapeutic values that prompted repeated suspension of the medication. Given the discrepancy between laboratory results and TAC withdrawal, measurement was repeated using the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), which demonstrated undetectable results, confirming false-positive values associated with ACMIA interference. TAC was safely reintroduced at a reduced dose, with subsequent concentrations remaining within the therapeutic range. During follow-up, the patient developed antibody-mediated rejection, which was successfully treated and maintained good graft function. This case highlights the importance of recognizing analytical limitations of TAC assays and emphasizes that unexpected results should prompt confirmatory testing using alternative methodologies. Integration of clinical judgment with laboratory data is essential to avoid inappropriate immunosuppressive management and to ensure graft safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 7","pages":"Pages 1388-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134526003532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tacrolimus (TAC) is a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation but has a narrow therapeutic window, requiring strict therapeutic drug monitoring. Several analytical methods are available for serum concentration measurement and methodological interference may lead to clinically misleading results. We report the case of a 67-year-old female kidney transplant recipient who presented with persistently elevated tacrolimus concentrations despite drug discontinuation. TAC concentrations were initially measured using the affinity column–mediated immunoassay (ACMIA), showing markedly supratherapeutic values that prompted repeated suspension of the medication. Given the discrepancy between laboratory results and TAC withdrawal, measurement was repeated using the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), which demonstrated undetectable results, confirming false-positive values associated with ACMIA interference. TAC was safely reintroduced at a reduced dose, with subsequent concentrations remaining within the therapeutic range. During follow-up, the patient developed antibody-mediated rejection, which was successfully treated and maintained good graft function. This case highlights the importance of recognizing analytical limitations of TAC assays and emphasizes that unexpected results should prompt confirmatory testing using alternative methodologies. Integration of clinical judgment with laboratory data is essential to avoid inappropriate immunosuppressive management and to ensure graft safety.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.