Effects of Poly(β-Amino Ester) Networks on Macrophage Response In Vitro

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kayla Castillo-Aguilar, Aiden Walter, Stephanie J. Bryant
{"title":"Effects of Poly(β-Amino Ester) Networks on Macrophage Response In Vitro","authors":"Kayla Castillo-Aguilar,&nbsp;Aiden Walter,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Bryant","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Poly(β-amino ester) or PBAE-based polymer networks are promising degradable biomaterials. This work investigated PBAEs formed from PBAE-diacrylate (PBAE-dA) macromers to assess how network chemistry and structure impact macrophages. PBAE-dAs were synthesized by an Aza-Michael type reaction between a diacrylate (butanediol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate or poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate) and benzhydrazide to produce B6, α6, and A6, respectively. B6 PBAE-dA, α6 PBAE-dA, and mixtures thereof have similar molecular weights while α6 and A6 PBAE-dA have the same chemistry, but different molecular weights, allowing investigation into network chemistry and structure, respectively. B6 networks were the least hydrophilic and slowest degrading, while A6 was the most hydrophilic and fastest degrading under accelerated degradation conditions. RAW-Blue™ and primary murine macrophages were pre-activated to mimic the in vivo phenotype and cultured on PBAE networks without and with pre-adsorbed plasma. Macrophage response was assessed by NF-κB activation, inflammatory markers for gene expression (<i>Il1b</i>, <i>Tnfa</i>, <i>Nos2</i>) and cytokine production (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-18). Comparing across PBAE networks, NF-κB activation was elevated in α6 and A6 but this did not translate to downstream pro-inflammatory cytokine response where there were minimal PBAE-dependent effects. Pre-adsorbed plasma attenuated macrophage activation on B6, α6, and co-polymers thereof but had no effect on A6 PBAE. While the most hydrophilic A6 PBAE induced a greater response across all PBAEs, it was lower compared to the hydrophobic polystyrene control. Collectively, this study further supports PBAEs for in vivo applications because their material properties and degradation rates are readily tunable while minimally affecting macrophage response.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"114 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poly(β-amino ester) or PBAE-based polymer networks are promising degradable biomaterials. This work investigated PBAEs formed from PBAE-diacrylate (PBAE-dA) macromers to assess how network chemistry and structure impact macrophages. PBAE-dAs were synthesized by an Aza-Michael type reaction between a diacrylate (butanediol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate or poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate) and benzhydrazide to produce B6, α6, and A6, respectively. B6 PBAE-dA, α6 PBAE-dA, and mixtures thereof have similar molecular weights while α6 and A6 PBAE-dA have the same chemistry, but different molecular weights, allowing investigation into network chemistry and structure, respectively. B6 networks were the least hydrophilic and slowest degrading, while A6 was the most hydrophilic and fastest degrading under accelerated degradation conditions. RAW-Blue™ and primary murine macrophages were pre-activated to mimic the in vivo phenotype and cultured on PBAE networks without and with pre-adsorbed plasma. Macrophage response was assessed by NF-κB activation, inflammatory markers for gene expression (Il1b, Tnfa, Nos2) and cytokine production (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-18). Comparing across PBAE networks, NF-κB activation was elevated in α6 and A6 but this did not translate to downstream pro-inflammatory cytokine response where there were minimal PBAE-dependent effects. Pre-adsorbed plasma attenuated macrophage activation on B6, α6, and co-polymers thereof but had no effect on A6 PBAE. While the most hydrophilic A6 PBAE induced a greater response across all PBAEs, it was lower compared to the hydrophobic polystyrene control. Collectively, this study further supports PBAEs for in vivo applications because their material properties and degradation rates are readily tunable while minimally affecting macrophage response.

聚(β-氨基酯)网络对巨噬细胞体外反应的影响
聚(β-氨基酯)或pbae基聚合物网络是很有前途的可降解生物材料。本研究研究了由pbae -二丙烯酸酯(PBAE-dA)大分子形成的PBAEs,以评估网络化学和结构如何影响巨噬细胞。以二丙烯酸酯(丁二醇二丙烯酸酯、二乙二醇二丙烯酸酯或聚乙二醇二丙烯酸酯)和苯并肼为原料,采用Aza-Michael型反应合成了PBAE-dAs,分别生成了B6、α6和A6。B6 PBAE-dA、α6 PBAE-dA及其混合物具有相似的分子量,而α6和A6 PBAE-dA具有相同的化学性质,但分子量不同,可以分别研究网络化学和结构。在加速降解条件下,B6网络亲水性最差,降解速度最慢,而A6网络亲水性最强,降解速度最快。RAW-Blue™和原代小鼠巨噬细胞被预激活以模拟体内表型,并在无预吸附血浆和含预吸附血浆的PBAE网络上培养。通过NF-κB活化、炎症标志物基因表达(il - 1b、TNF-α、Nos2)和细胞因子产生(IL-6、TNF-α和IL-18)评估巨噬细胞反应。比较PBAE网络,NF-κB活化在α6和A6中升高,但这并没有转化为下游的促炎细胞因子反应,在那里只有最小的PBAE依赖性作用。预吸附血浆可减弱巨噬细胞对B6、α6及其共聚物的激活,但对A6 PBAE无影响。虽然最亲水的A6 PBAEs在所有PBAEs中引起了更大的反应,但与疏水的聚苯乙烯对照相比,它的反应要低一些。总的来说,这项研究进一步支持了PBAEs在体内的应用,因为它们的材料特性和降解率很容易调节,同时对巨噬细胞反应的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device. The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书