Kayla Castillo-Aguilar, Aiden Walter, Stephanie J. Bryant
{"title":"Effects of Poly(β-Amino Ester) Networks on Macrophage Response In Vitro","authors":"Kayla Castillo-Aguilar, Aiden Walter, Stephanie J. Bryant","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Poly(β-amino ester) or PBAE-based polymer networks are promising degradable biomaterials. This work investigated PBAEs formed from PBAE-diacrylate (PBAE-dA) macromers to assess how network chemistry and structure impact macrophages. PBAE-dAs were synthesized by an Aza-Michael type reaction between a diacrylate (butanediol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate or poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate) and benzhydrazide to produce B6, α6, and A6, respectively. B6 PBAE-dA, α6 PBAE-dA, and mixtures thereof have similar molecular weights while α6 and A6 PBAE-dA have the same chemistry, but different molecular weights, allowing investigation into network chemistry and structure, respectively. B6 networks were the least hydrophilic and slowest degrading, while A6 was the most hydrophilic and fastest degrading under accelerated degradation conditions. RAW-Blue™ and primary murine macrophages were pre-activated to mimic the in vivo phenotype and cultured on PBAE networks without and with pre-adsorbed plasma. Macrophage response was assessed by NF-κB activation, inflammatory markers for gene expression (<i>Il1b</i>, <i>Tnfa</i>, <i>Nos2</i>) and cytokine production (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-18). Comparing across PBAE networks, NF-κB activation was elevated in α6 and A6 but this did not translate to downstream pro-inflammatory cytokine response where there were minimal PBAE-dependent effects. Pre-adsorbed plasma attenuated macrophage activation on B6, α6, and co-polymers thereof but had no effect on A6 PBAE. While the most hydrophilic A6 PBAE induced a greater response across all PBAEs, it was lower compared to the hydrophobic polystyrene control. Collectively, this study further supports PBAEs for in vivo applications because their material properties and degradation rates are readily tunable while minimally affecting macrophage response.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"114 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Poly(β-amino ester) or PBAE-based polymer networks are promising degradable biomaterials. This work investigated PBAEs formed from PBAE-diacrylate (PBAE-dA) macromers to assess how network chemistry and structure impact macrophages. PBAE-dAs were synthesized by an Aza-Michael type reaction between a diacrylate (butanediol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate or poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate) and benzhydrazide to produce B6, α6, and A6, respectively. B6 PBAE-dA, α6 PBAE-dA, and mixtures thereof have similar molecular weights while α6 and A6 PBAE-dA have the same chemistry, but different molecular weights, allowing investigation into network chemistry and structure, respectively. B6 networks were the least hydrophilic and slowest degrading, while A6 was the most hydrophilic and fastest degrading under accelerated degradation conditions. RAW-Blue™ and primary murine macrophages were pre-activated to mimic the in vivo phenotype and cultured on PBAE networks without and with pre-adsorbed plasma. Macrophage response was assessed by NF-κB activation, inflammatory markers for gene expression (Il1b, Tnfa, Nos2) and cytokine production (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-18). Comparing across PBAE networks, NF-κB activation was elevated in α6 and A6 but this did not translate to downstream pro-inflammatory cytokine response where there were minimal PBAE-dependent effects. Pre-adsorbed plasma attenuated macrophage activation on B6, α6, and co-polymers thereof but had no effect on A6 PBAE. While the most hydrophilic A6 PBAE induced a greater response across all PBAEs, it was lower compared to the hydrophobic polystyrene control. Collectively, this study further supports PBAEs for in vivo applications because their material properties and degradation rates are readily tunable while minimally affecting macrophage response.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device.
The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials.
Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.