Contextual insights from large language models in ambulatory assessment: Differential reactivity of affect and self-esteem to daily events in borderline personality disorder.

IF 4.6 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-27 DOI:10.1037/abn0001143
David Levi Tekampe, Tobias D Kockler, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer, Angelica Mendes, Martin Bohus, Philip S Santangelo
{"title":"Contextual insights from large language models in ambulatory assessment: Differential reactivity of affect and self-esteem to daily events in borderline personality disorder.","authors":"David Levi Tekampe, Tobias D Kockler, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer, Angelica Mendes, Martin Bohus, Philip S Santangelo","doi":"10.1037/abn0001143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ambulatory assessment (AA) research often relies on closed-ended context checklists, whereas open-ended event descriptions preserve richer idiographic context but are rarely analyzed at scale. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by marked instability, providing a clinically informative use case for testing scalable approaches to contextual dynamics in daily life. We investigated the association of event context and sentiment (i.e., emotional connotation) derived using a large language model (LLM) with self-reported momentary calmness, affective valence, and self-esteem in a sample of 265 women (131 individuals with BPD and 134 healthy controls) undergoing a 4-day high-frequency AA with 12 hourly assessments per day. We evaluated an automated LLM pipeline for classifying 10,844 free-text entries and for rating event-related sentiment, enabling quantitative modeling of context and appraisal in AA. The free-text entries were classified into five categories: daily routines and household, leisure and recreation, social and personal relationships, work and professional engagements, health and well-being, plus an indeterminate category. Results showed the BPD group had lower values across outcomes and reacted with significantly lower calmness and self-esteem during social/personal events, as well as significantly lower self-esteem during health- and well-being-related activities, compared with controls. When sentiment was modeled alongside event categories, more positive-than-usual sentiments were associated with higher calmness, valence, and self-esteem, whereas more negative-than-usual sentiments were associated with lower states, with larger sentiment reactivity in BPD for calmness, valence and self-esteem. By employing LLMs for automated text categorization and sentiment analysis of free-text entries within AA research, we have effectively incorporated contextual information into our analysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ambulatory assessment (AA) research often relies on closed-ended context checklists, whereas open-ended event descriptions preserve richer idiographic context but are rarely analyzed at scale. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by marked instability, providing a clinically informative use case for testing scalable approaches to contextual dynamics in daily life. We investigated the association of event context and sentiment (i.e., emotional connotation) derived using a large language model (LLM) with self-reported momentary calmness, affective valence, and self-esteem in a sample of 265 women (131 individuals with BPD and 134 healthy controls) undergoing a 4-day high-frequency AA with 12 hourly assessments per day. We evaluated an automated LLM pipeline for classifying 10,844 free-text entries and for rating event-related sentiment, enabling quantitative modeling of context and appraisal in AA. The free-text entries were classified into five categories: daily routines and household, leisure and recreation, social and personal relationships, work and professional engagements, health and well-being, plus an indeterminate category. Results showed the BPD group had lower values across outcomes and reacted with significantly lower calmness and self-esteem during social/personal events, as well as significantly lower self-esteem during health- and well-being-related activities, compared with controls. When sentiment was modeled alongside event categories, more positive-than-usual sentiments were associated with higher calmness, valence, and self-esteem, whereas more negative-than-usual sentiments were associated with lower states, with larger sentiment reactivity in BPD for calmness, valence and self-esteem. By employing LLMs for automated text categorization and sentiment analysis of free-text entries within AA research, we have effectively incorporated contextual information into our analysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

动态评估中大型语言模型的语境洞察:边缘型人格障碍患者对日常事件的情感和自尊差异反应。
动态评估(AA)研究通常依赖于封闭的情境检查表,而开放式事件描述保留了更丰富的具体情境,但很少进行大规模分析。边缘型人格障碍(BPD)以显著的不稳定性为特征,为日常生活中可扩展的情境动态方法的测试提供了临床信息用例。我们调查了265名女性(131名BPD患者和134名健康对照)的事件背景和情绪(即情绪内涵)与自我报告的瞬间平静、情感效价和自尊的关联,这些女性接受了为期4天的高频AA,每天12小时评估。我们评估了一个自动化的LLM管道,用于对10,844个自由文本条目进行分类,并对事件相关的情绪进行评级,从而实现了AA级上下文和评估的定量建模。自由文本条目被分为五个类别:日常生活和家庭、休闲和娱乐、社会和个人关系、工作和专业交往、健康和幸福,以及一个不确定的类别。结果显示,与对照组相比,BPD组在所有结果中都有较低的价值,在社交/个人活动中表现出明显较低的冷静和自尊,在与健康和幸福相关的活动中也表现出明显较低的自尊。当情绪与事件类别一起建模时,比平时更积极的情绪与更高的冷静、效价和自尊有关,而比平时更消极的情绪与更低的状态有关,BPD中对冷静、效价和自尊的情绪反应更大。通过使用法学硕士对AA研究中的自由文本条目进行自动文本分类和情感分析,我们有效地将上下文信息纳入了我们的分析中。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书