Who is Responsible for Online Gambling Harm? Personal Responsibility, Industry Accountability, and Support for Regulation.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Peter Kardos, Michael J A Wohl
{"title":"Who is Responsible for Online Gambling Harm? Personal Responsibility, Industry Accountability, and Support for Regulation.","authors":"Peter Kardos, Michael J A Wohl","doi":"10.1007/s10899-026-10539-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models of problem and responsible gambling have long emphasized personal responsibility, informed choice, and player agency as central to preventing gambling-related harm. Yet gambling harm occurs within broader commercial and regulatory systems, raising questions about how responsibility is distributed across players, operators, and regulators. In a study of 297 American adults, we examined responsibility attributions for online gambling-related harm and whether gambling history, problem gambling severity, and online gambling activity shape these attributions. Participants attributed the greatest responsibility to players, but also substantial responsibility to operators and regulators, suggesting that gambling-related harm is perceived as a shared responsibility rather than solely a player-level issue. Participants who gambled and those who did not gamble showed similar mean responsibility attributions, although responsibility judgments were more zero-sum among those who gambled: greater player responsibility was associated with lower operator and regulator responsibility. Among those who gambled, higher problem gambling severity predicted greater responsibility attributed to operators and regulators, whereas greater online gambling activity predicted greater responsibility attributed to operators. Neither predictor was associated with lower player responsibility. Finally, responsibility attributed to operators and regulators, but not players, predicted stronger support for stricter online gambling regulation. These findings suggest that greater gambling involvement and harm may heighten recognition of system-level responsibility without diminishing perceived player agency. They also point to a shared-responsibility model in which player agency remains important, but operator and regulator accountability are central to how the public understands and responds to online gambling harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gambling Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gambling Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-026-10539-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models of problem and responsible gambling have long emphasized personal responsibility, informed choice, and player agency as central to preventing gambling-related harm. Yet gambling harm occurs within broader commercial and regulatory systems, raising questions about how responsibility is distributed across players, operators, and regulators. In a study of 297 American adults, we examined responsibility attributions for online gambling-related harm and whether gambling history, problem gambling severity, and online gambling activity shape these attributions. Participants attributed the greatest responsibility to players, but also substantial responsibility to operators and regulators, suggesting that gambling-related harm is perceived as a shared responsibility rather than solely a player-level issue. Participants who gambled and those who did not gamble showed similar mean responsibility attributions, although responsibility judgments were more zero-sum among those who gambled: greater player responsibility was associated with lower operator and regulator responsibility. Among those who gambled, higher problem gambling severity predicted greater responsibility attributed to operators and regulators, whereas greater online gambling activity predicted greater responsibility attributed to operators. Neither predictor was associated with lower player responsibility. Finally, responsibility attributed to operators and regulators, but not players, predicted stronger support for stricter online gambling regulation. These findings suggest that greater gambling involvement and harm may heighten recognition of system-level responsibility without diminishing perceived player agency. They also point to a shared-responsibility model in which player agency remains important, but operator and regulator accountability are central to how the public understands and responds to online gambling harm.

网络赌博危害谁负责?个人责任、行业责任和监管支持。
长期以来,问题赌博和负责任赌博的模式一直强调个人责任、知情选择和玩家代理是防止赌博相关伤害的核心。然而,赌博危害发生在更广泛的商业和监管系统中,这引发了关于玩家、运营商和监管机构之间责任如何分配的问题。在一项对297名美国成年人的研究中,我们检查了在线赌博相关伤害的责任归因,以及赌博历史、问题赌博严重程度和在线赌博活动是否塑造了这些归因。参与者认为最大的责任在于玩家,但经营者和监管者也有很大的责任,这表明与赌博相关的伤害被视为一种共同的责任,而不仅仅是玩家层面的问题。参与赌博的参与者和不参与赌博的参与者表现出相似的平均责任归因,尽管参与赌博的参与者的责任判断更像是零和博弈:参与者的责任越大,经营者和监管者的责任越低。在那些赌博的人中,问题赌博严重程度越高,运营商和监管机构的责任就越大,而在线赌博活动越多,运营商的责任就越大。这两项预测指标都与较低的玩家责任感有关。最后,运营商和监管机构的责任,而不是玩家的责任,预示着更严格的在线赌博监管将得到更大的支持。这些发现表明,更多的赌博参与和伤害可能会提高对系统层面责任的认识,而不会减少感知到的玩家代理。他们还指出了一种共同责任模式,在这种模式中,玩家代理仍然很重要,但运营商和监管机构的责任是公众如何理解和应对在线赌博危害的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Journal of Gambling Studies is an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination on the many aspects of gambling behavior, both controlled and pathological, as well as variety of problems attendant to, or resultant from, gambling behavior including alcoholism, suicide, crime, and a number of other mental health problems. Articles published in this journal are representative of a cross-section of disciplines including psychiatry, psychology, sociology, political science, criminology, and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书