Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy With Duodenal Food Challenge Does Not Predict Triggering Food Items in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results From a Pilot Trial.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karlien Raymenants, Lukas M Balsiger, Jolien Schol, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Joran Tóth, Daphne Dufour, Gert De Hertogh, Ricard Farré, Kristin Verbeke, Walburga Dieterich, Yurdagül Zopf, Matthias Ceulemans, Astrid Verbiest, Joris Arts, Lucas Wauters, Tim Vanuytsel, Jan Tack
{"title":"Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy With Duodenal Food Challenge Does Not Predict Triggering Food Items in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results From a Pilot Trial.","authors":"Karlien Raymenants, Lukas M Balsiger, Jolien Schol, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Joran Tóth, Daphne Dufour, Gert De Hertogh, Ricard Farré, Kristin Verbeke, Walburga Dieterich, Yurdagül Zopf, Matthias Ceulemans, Astrid Verbiest, Joris Arts, Lucas Wauters, Tim Vanuytsel, Jan Tack","doi":"10.5056/jnm25132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>: Targeted elimination of triggering food items is an attractive treatment option in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, no reliable biomarkers exist to identify culprit foods. In a previous uncontrolled study, 6/9 responded to duodenal food challenge (DFC), visualized by confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). This study aims to assess efficacy of a targeted elimination diet based on identification of nutrients that trigger acute mucosal alterations in the duodenum compared to a sham diet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: Randomized double-blind cross-over study in EoE. After baseline endoscopy, patients with peak eosinophil count of > 15 eosinophils/high power field underwent CLE. Following baseline assessment, a solution of foods (grains/milk/egg/soy/fish/nuts) was sprayed on the duodenal mucosa, with repeat imaging thereafter. Mucosa was judged as altered in case of fluorescein leakage and particle shedding. Based on the results, patients underwent a blinded randomized 6-week cross-over elimination diet with follow-up endoscopy. Exploratory measurements were done for small intestinal permeability, eosinophil- and mast cell activation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: Seven patients completed the study. At CLE, 1 patient displayed baseline alterations, 5 reacted to 1 to 2 nutrients in 2 sessions (milk = 4, grains = 2, nuts = 2, fish = 1). There was no association between CLE results, and presence of food-specific IgE (<i>P</i> > 0.999). Both dietary arms resulted in a similar histological response (<i>P</i> > 0.999), with histological remission in only 1 patient (excluding gluten-containing grains). Permeability, eosinophil or mast cell activation were not different between arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: In this pilot blinded cross-over trial, a targeted elimination diet based on the results of CLE with DFC did not generate a superior response compared to a sham diet.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"32 3","pages":"350-361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm25132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: : Targeted elimination of triggering food items is an attractive treatment option in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, no reliable biomarkers exist to identify culprit foods. In a previous uncontrolled study, 6/9 responded to duodenal food challenge (DFC), visualized by confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). This study aims to assess efficacy of a targeted elimination diet based on identification of nutrients that trigger acute mucosal alterations in the duodenum compared to a sham diet.

Methods: : Randomized double-blind cross-over study in EoE. After baseline endoscopy, patients with peak eosinophil count of > 15 eosinophils/high power field underwent CLE. Following baseline assessment, a solution of foods (grains/milk/egg/soy/fish/nuts) was sprayed on the duodenal mucosa, with repeat imaging thereafter. Mucosa was judged as altered in case of fluorescein leakage and particle shedding. Based on the results, patients underwent a blinded randomized 6-week cross-over elimination diet with follow-up endoscopy. Exploratory measurements were done for small intestinal permeability, eosinophil- and mast cell activation.

Results: : Seven patients completed the study. At CLE, 1 patient displayed baseline alterations, 5 reacted to 1 to 2 nutrients in 2 sessions (milk = 4, grains = 2, nuts = 2, fish = 1). There was no association between CLE results, and presence of food-specific IgE (P > 0.999). Both dietary arms resulted in a similar histological response (P > 0.999), with histological remission in only 1 patient (excluding gluten-containing grains). Permeability, eosinophil or mast cell activation were not different between arms.

Conclusions: : In this pilot blinded cross-over trial, a targeted elimination diet based on the results of CLE with DFC did not generate a superior response compared to a sham diet.

共聚焦激光内镜十二指肠食物刺激不能预测嗜酸性食管炎的触发食物:一项试点试验的结果。
背景/目的:有针对性地消除诱发性食物是嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)的一种有吸引力的治疗选择。然而,目前还没有可靠的生物标志物来识别罪魁祸首食物。在之前的非对照研究中,通过共聚焦激光内镜(CLE)观察,6/9对十二指肠食物挑战(DFC)有反应。本研究旨在评估靶向消除饮食的有效性,该饮食基于对诱发十二指肠急性粘膜改变的营养物质的识别,与假饮食相比。方法:随机双盲交叉研究。基线内镜检查后,嗜酸性粒细胞计数达到峰值的患者行CLE。基线评估后,将食物溶液(谷物/牛奶/鸡蛋/大豆/鱼/坚果)喷洒在十二指肠黏膜上,然后重复成像。荧光素渗漏及颗粒脱落判断粘膜改变。根据结果,患者接受了盲法随机6周的交叉消除饮食和随访内窥镜检查。探索性测量小肠通透性,嗜酸性粒细胞和肥大细胞活化。结果:7例患者完成了研究。在CLE中,1名患者显示基线改变,5名患者在2个疗程中对1到2种营养素(牛奶= 4,谷物= 2,坚果= 2,鱼= 1)产生反应。CLE结果与食物特异性IgE的存在无相关性(P < 0.05)。两组饮食均产生相似的组织学反应(P < 0.05 0.999),只有1例患者的组织学缓解(不含麸质谷物)。渗透性、嗜酸性粒细胞和肥大细胞活化在两组间无差异。结论:在这项盲法交叉试验中,与假饮食相比,基于CLE和DFC结果的靶向消除饮食并没有产生更好的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书