Inter-Group Agreement in Chest Radiographic Quality Assessment: Comparing Final-Year Students and Experienced Radiographers Across Three Quality Assessment Domains During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
IF 2.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peter O'Reilly, Dania Abu Awwad, Ernest Ekpo, Warren Reed
{"title":"Inter-Group Agreement in Chest Radiographic Quality Assessment: Comparing Final-Year Students and Experienced Radiographers Across Three Quality Assessment Domains During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Peter O'Reilly, Dania Abu Awwad, Ernest Ekpo, Warren Reed","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reproducible image quality assessment (QA) by radiographers is vital to minimise inter-observer variation and reduce unnecessary repeat exposures. This study compared the consistency of chest X-ray (CXR) image quality assessments between final-year student radiographers and experienced radiographers across three distinct QA domains (positioning, sharpness and visibility) to observe skill consistency across different pathology categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study analysed 70 de-identified CXRs acquired between May and September 2021 from patients presenting with symptoms of pulmonary infection during the COVID-19 pandemic and retrieved from the PACS archive of a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed each case and discussed their interpretations to reach a consensus classification based on the available clinical information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups in any domain across the different pathology categories (p > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal mean variability, with students rating marginally lower and narrow 95% limits of agreement across all domains. Overall ICC values indicated good-to-excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94). These single-institution findings should be interpreted within the dataset's context.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Final-year students and experienced radiographers applied QA criteria consistently, demonstrating robust skills across different pathology categories. The small negative bias observed may reflect a more cautious interpretive approach rather than meaningful disagreement. These findings indicate that final-year radiography students demonstrate agreement with experienced radiographers in the application of structured image-quality criteria under controlled assessment conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13403023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Reproducible image quality assessment (QA) by radiographers is vital to minimise inter-observer variation and reduce unnecessary repeat exposures. This study compared the consistency of chest X-ray (CXR) image quality assessments between final-year student radiographers and experienced radiographers across three distinct QA domains (positioning, sharpness and visibility) to observe skill consistency across different pathology categories.
Methods: This retrospective observational study analysed 70 de-identified CXRs acquired between May and September 2021 from patients presenting with symptoms of pulmonary infection during the COVID-19 pandemic and retrieved from the PACS archive of a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed each case and discussed their interpretations to reach a consensus classification based on the available clinical information.
Results: No significant differences were found between groups in any domain across the different pathology categories (p > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal mean variability, with students rating marginally lower and narrow 95% limits of agreement across all domains. Overall ICC values indicated good-to-excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94). These single-institution findings should be interpreted within the dataset's context.
Conclusion: Final-year students and experienced radiographers applied QA criteria consistently, demonstrating robust skills across different pathology categories. The small negative bias observed may reflect a more cautious interpretive approach rather than meaningful disagreement. These findings indicate that final-year radiography students demonstrate agreement with experienced radiographers in the application of structured image-quality criteria under controlled assessment conditions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).