Clustering of Cerebral Microbleeds in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Flow Territory-Based Analysis

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-07-25 DOI:10.1002/jmri.70454
Manon R. Schipper, Reinier G. J. van der Zwet, Jelle J. Goeman, Thijs W. van Harten, Emma A. Koemans, Marieke J. H. Wermer, Marianne A. A. van Walderveen, Matthias J. P. van Osch
{"title":"Clustering of Cerebral Microbleeds in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Flow Territory-Based Analysis","authors":"Manon R. Schipper,&nbsp;Reinier G. J. van der Zwet,&nbsp;Jelle J. Goeman,&nbsp;Thijs W. van Harten,&nbsp;Emma A. Koemans,&nbsp;Marieke J. H. Wermer,&nbsp;Marianne A. A. van Walderveen,&nbsp;Matthias J. P. van Osch","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are a key imaging marker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but their individual spatial distribution and potential clustering remain poorly understood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study assessed whether CMBs exhibit patient-specific, flow territory-based clustering in sporadic (sCAA) and Dutch-type hereditary CAA (D-CAA). The arterial flow territory subdivision was chosen, considering the predilection of CMB location in the posterior cortex—not limited to the occipital lobe—and the prominent vascular role in CAA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Type</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three participants (17 (52%) female, 65 ± 12 years old, 19 sCAA; 14 D-CAA) without symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and ≥ 1 CMB were included for the main analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Field Strength/Sequence</h3>\n \n <p>3 T MRI susceptibility-weighted imaging, multi-echo 3D gradient echo.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Assessment</h3>\n \n <p>Spatial CMB patterns were evaluated by comparing observed versus expected CMB density within covariate-matched subgroups, accounting for age, sex, CAA-type, smoking, and hypertension. CMBs were manually annotated and assigned to six arterial flow territories (left/right ACA, MCA, PCA) using a standardized atlas. A sensitivity analysis was performed on all participants (including sICH+ participants).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Statistical Tests</h3>\n \n <p>Expected values were calculated by multiplying flow territory CMB proportions per covariate-matched subgroup. Unweighted individual chi-square statistics were calculated, and statistical significance was assessed via permutation testing (10,000 replications) per covariate group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across covariate-matched subgroups, observed CMB counts significantly deviated from expected distributions, indicating substantial interindividual variability and within-participant clustering (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 6920). The effect remained significant when including sICH+ participants (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 102,027, <i>n</i> = 85; 44 sCAA; 41 D-CAA). CMB densities differed across flow territories, with highest median densities in the right PCA, right MCA, and left PCA (0.173 (IQR = 0.387), 0.121 (IQR = 0.238), and 0.113 (IQR = 0.389) counts per cm<sup>3</sup>, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings indicate CMBs in CAA are not identically distributed but show patient-specific clustering within flow territories, suggesting variable regional vulnerability, potentially influenced by local pathology or vascular anatomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evidence Level</h3>\n \n <p>1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Technical Efficacy</h3>\n \n <p>Stage 2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"64 5","pages":"1241-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmri.70454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.70454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are a key imaging marker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but their individual spatial distribution and potential clustering remain poorly understood.

Purpose

This study assessed whether CMBs exhibit patient-specific, flow territory-based clustering in sporadic (sCAA) and Dutch-type hereditary CAA (D-CAA). The arterial flow territory subdivision was chosen, considering the predilection of CMB location in the posterior cortex—not limited to the occipital lobe—and the prominent vascular role in CAA.

Study Type

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Population

Thirty-three participants (17 (52%) female, 65 ± 12 years old, 19 sCAA; 14 D-CAA) without symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and ≥ 1 CMB were included for the main analysis.

Field Strength/Sequence

3 T MRI susceptibility-weighted imaging, multi-echo 3D gradient echo.

Assessment

Spatial CMB patterns were evaluated by comparing observed versus expected CMB density within covariate-matched subgroups, accounting for age, sex, CAA-type, smoking, and hypertension. CMBs were manually annotated and assigned to six arterial flow territories (left/right ACA, MCA, PCA) using a standardized atlas. A sensitivity analysis was performed on all participants (including sICH+ participants).

Statistical Tests

Expected values were calculated by multiplying flow territory CMB proportions per covariate-matched subgroup. Unweighted individual chi-square statistics were calculated, and statistical significance was assessed via permutation testing (10,000 replications) per covariate group.

Results

Across covariate-matched subgroups, observed CMB counts significantly deviated from expected distributions, indicating substantial interindividual variability and within-participant clustering (χ2 = 6920). The effect remained significant when including sICH+ participants (χ2 = 102,027, n = 85; 44 sCAA; 41 D-CAA). CMB densities differed across flow territories, with highest median densities in the right PCA, right MCA, and left PCA (0.173 (IQR = 0.387), 0.121 (IQR = 0.238), and 0.113 (IQR = 0.389) counts per cm3, respectively).

Data Conclusion

These findings indicate CMBs in CAA are not identically distributed but show patient-specific clustering within flow territories, suggesting variable regional vulnerability, potentially influenced by local pathology or vascular anatomy.

Evidence Level

1.

Technical Efficacy

Stage 2.

脑淀粉样血管病的脑微出血聚类:一种基于血流区域的分析。
背景:脑微出血(CMBs)是脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)的关键影像学标志物,但其个体空间分布和潜在的聚类性尚不清楚。目的:本研究评估CMBs在散发性(sCAA)和荷兰型遗传性CAA (D-CAA)中是否表现出患者特异性、基于流动区域的聚集性。选择动脉血流区域细分,考虑到CMB位于后皮层的偏好-不限于枕叶-以及CAA中突出的血管作用。研究类型:回顾性横断面研究。人群:33例,其中女性17例(52%),年龄65±12岁,sCAA 19例;14 D-CAA)无症状性脑出血(siich)且≥1 CMB为主要分析对象。场强/序列:3t MRI磁化加权成像,多回波三维梯度回波。评估:通过比较协变量匹配亚组中观察到的和预期的CMB密度来评估空间CMB模式,考虑到年龄、性别、caa类型、吸烟和高血压。使用标准化图集对CMBs进行手动注释,并将其分配到六个动脉血流区域(左/右ACA, MCA, PCA)。对所有参与者(包括siich +参与者)进行敏感性分析。统计检验:期望值通过乘以每个协变量匹配的子组的流量区域CMB比例来计算。计算未加权的个体卡方统计量,并通过每个协变量组的排列检验(10,000个重复)评估统计显著性。结果:在协变量匹配的亚组中,观察到的CMB计数明显偏离预期分布,表明存在大量的个体间差异和参与者内聚类(χ2 = 6920)。当纳入sICH+参与者时,效果仍然显著(χ2 = 102,027, n = 85; sCAA 44; D-CAA 41)。CMB密度在不同的流区存在差异,其中右侧PCA、右侧MCA和左侧PCA的中位数密度最高(分别为0.173 (IQR = 0.387)、0.121 (IQR = 0.238)和0.113 (IQR = 0.389)计数/ cm3)。数据结论:这些发现表明,CAA中的CMBs分布不一致,但在血流区域内表现出患者特异性聚集,表明不同的区域脆弱性可能受到局部病理或血管解剖的影响。证据等级:1。技术功效:第二阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书