Experimental evidence that seed availability and microsite conditions influence post‐fire seedling recruitment

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Jared J. Beck, Stuart Wagenius
{"title":"Experimental evidence that seed availability and microsite conditions influence post‐fire seedling recruitment","authors":"Jared J. Beck, Stuart Wagenius","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item> In many historically fire‐dependent ecosystems, the abundance of newly emerged seedlings increases after fire. Greater post‐fire seedling recruitment has been widely attributed to environmental conditions that promote seedling emergence (i.e. seeds germinate and exhibit above‐ground growth) and post‐emergence survival. However, fire increases flowering and seed production in many species making it difficult to assess the extent to which post‐fire seedling abundance reflects microsite conditions versus seed availability. Experimental manipulation of seed inputs can elucidate how seed availability versus microsite conditions contribute to post‐fire seedling abundance. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> We experimentally manipulated years since fire across 36 patches of remnant tallgrass prairie within an agriculturally fragmented 6400 ha landscape in western Minnesota (USA). Over 2 years, we sowed 10,962 <jats:italic>Echinacea angustifolia</jats:italic> (Asteraceae) seeds across 84 randomly placed transects. We then located and tracked the 974 newly emerged seedlings to evaluate how time since fire influenced seedling emergence and survival after controlling for variation in seed inputs. We also evaluated the association between six environmental covariates and seedling emergence and survival. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Fire influenced both seedling emergence and survival between spring emergence and late summer. Seedlings emerged from approximately 1% of all seeds sown prior to experimental burns while seeds sown 1 year after experimental burns emerged at more than 10 times this rate. Emergence rates then declined as years since fire increased. Sowing seeds at high densities reduced rates of seedling emergence but nonetheless increased overall seedling abundance. Increases in litter depth were associated with reduced emergence. Meanwhile, the probability that seedlings survived to late summer was greatest 0 or 1 years after fire. The probability of seedling survival decreased with litter depth and increased with the local density of conspecific seedlings. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic> . Our experiment demonstrates that fire enhances seedling recruitment by generating microsite conditions that favour seedling emergence and survival. Nevertheless, seedling abundance also increased with seed inputs, suggesting that both seed availability and microsite conditions influence post‐fire seedling recruitment. Experiments like ours that explicitly discriminate between seed‐ and microsite‐limitation of recruitment are crucial for revealing processes that influence plant demographic responses to fire in many historically fire‐dependent ecosystems. </jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many historically fire‐dependent ecosystems, the abundance of newly emerged seedlings increases after fire. Greater post‐fire seedling recruitment has been widely attributed to environmental conditions that promote seedling emergence (i.e. seeds germinate and exhibit above‐ground growth) and post‐emergence survival. However, fire increases flowering and seed production in many species making it difficult to assess the extent to which post‐fire seedling abundance reflects microsite conditions versus seed availability. Experimental manipulation of seed inputs can elucidate how seed availability versus microsite conditions contribute to post‐fire seedling abundance. We experimentally manipulated years since fire across 36 patches of remnant tallgrass prairie within an agriculturally fragmented 6400 ha landscape in western Minnesota (USA). Over 2 years, we sowed 10,962 Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae) seeds across 84 randomly placed transects. We then located and tracked the 974 newly emerged seedlings to evaluate how time since fire influenced seedling emergence and survival after controlling for variation in seed inputs. We also evaluated the association between six environmental covariates and seedling emergence and survival. Fire influenced both seedling emergence and survival between spring emergence and late summer. Seedlings emerged from approximately 1% of all seeds sown prior to experimental burns while seeds sown 1 year after experimental burns emerged at more than 10 times this rate. Emergence rates then declined as years since fire increased. Sowing seeds at high densities reduced rates of seedling emergence but nonetheless increased overall seedling abundance. Increases in litter depth were associated with reduced emergence. Meanwhile, the probability that seedlings survived to late summer was greatest 0 or 1 years after fire. The probability of seedling survival decreased with litter depth and increased with the local density of conspecific seedlings. Synthesis . Our experiment demonstrates that fire enhances seedling recruitment by generating microsite conditions that favour seedling emergence and survival. Nevertheless, seedling abundance also increased with seed inputs, suggesting that both seed availability and microsite conditions influence post‐fire seedling recruitment. Experiments like ours that explicitly discriminate between seed‐ and microsite‐limitation of recruitment are crucial for revealing processes that influence plant demographic responses to fire in many historically fire‐dependent ecosystems.
实验证据表明,种子有效性和微场地条件影响火灾后的幼苗招募
在许多历史上依赖火灾的生态系统中,新出现的幼苗丰度在火灾后增加。火灾后更多的幼苗招募被广泛归因于促进幼苗出苗(即种子发芽并表现出地上生长)和出苗后存活的环境条件。然而,火灾增加了许多物种的开花和种子产量,因此很难评估火灾后幼苗丰度反映微场地条件与种子可用性的程度。种子投入的实验操作可以阐明种子可用性与微场地条件对火灾后幼苗丰度的影响。在美国明尼苏达州西部的一片6400公顷的农业破碎景观中,我们对36块残存的高草草原进行了火灾后的实验操作。在2年多的时间里,我们在84个随机放置的样地上播种了10,962颗紫锥菊(菊科)种子。然后,我们定位并跟踪了974株新出苗,以评估在控制种子投入变化后,火灾时间如何影响幼苗的出苗和存活。我们还评估了六个环境协变量与幼苗出苗和存活之间的关系。在春季出苗期和夏末出苗期,火灾对幼苗出苗期和成活率均有影响。在实验烧伤前播种的种子中,幼苗的出苗率约为1%,而在实验烧伤一年后播种的种子出苗率是这个比例的10倍以上。随着火灾发生时间的增加,突现率随之下降。高密度播种降低了出苗率,但总体上增加了幼苗丰度。凋落物深度的增加与出苗率的降低有关。同时,火灾后0年和1年幼苗存活到夏末的概率最大。幼苗成活率随凋落物深度的增加而降低,随同株幼苗密度的增加而增加。合成。我们的实验表明,火通过产生有利于幼苗出苗和存活的微场条件来促进幼苗招募。然而,幼苗丰度也随着种子的投入而增加,这表明种子有效性和微场地条件都会影响火灾后的幼苗招募。像我们这样明确区分种子和微站点招募限制的实验,对于揭示在许多历史上依赖火灾的生态系统中影响植物种群对火灾反应的过程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书