Tessa R. MacNish, Hawlader A. Al‐Mamun, Thomas Bergmann, Lixi Jiang, David Edwards
{"title":"Haplotypes and Machine Learning Improve Genomic Prediction in Brassica napus","authors":"Tessa R. MacNish, Hawlader A. Al‐Mamun, Thomas Bergmann, Lixi Jiang, David Edwards","doi":"10.1111/pbi.70730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genomic selection (GS) is a crop and livestock improvement method suited for predicting complex agronomical traits, while genomic prediction (GP) is the development of GS models prior to their practical use in breeding programs. One of the challenges in GP is accounting for how complex genomic interactions, such as epistasis, affect the resulting phenotype. Incorporating haplotypes and Machine Learning (ML) into GP models are two methods for accounting for local epistasis and non‐linear relationships. This study compared linear‐ and ML‐GP models for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> <jats:italic>Brassica napus</jats:italic> </jats:styled-content> . A publicly available dataset of 991 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> <jats:italic>B. napus</jats:italic> </jats:styled-content> individuals, 4 286 896 SNPs, and the traits flowering time, oil content and oleic acid content was used for all GP models. The ML models improved trait prediction accuracy for all tested traits in both SNP‐ and haplotype‐based GP. While haplotypes did not significantly boost prediction accuracy over SNPs, they captured novel genetic variation and offered a broader diversity of variants for selection, suggesting a qualitative advantage for long‐term breeding goals. Here, we demonstrate how haplotypes and ML can improve GS in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> <jats:italic>B. napus</jats:italic> </jats:styled-content> .","PeriodicalId":221,"journal":{"name":"Plant Biotechnology Journal","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a crop and livestock improvement method suited for predicting complex agronomical traits, while genomic prediction (GP) is the development of GS models prior to their practical use in breeding programs. One of the challenges in GP is accounting for how complex genomic interactions, such as epistasis, affect the resulting phenotype. Incorporating haplotypes and Machine Learning (ML) into GP models are two methods for accounting for local epistasis and non‐linear relationships. This study compared linear‐ and ML‐GP models for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in Brassica napus . A publicly available dataset of 991 B. napus individuals, 4 286 896 SNPs, and the traits flowering time, oil content and oleic acid content was used for all GP models. The ML models improved trait prediction accuracy for all tested traits in both SNP‐ and haplotype‐based GP. While haplotypes did not significantly boost prediction accuracy over SNPs, they captured novel genetic variation and offered a broader diversity of variants for selection, suggesting a qualitative advantage for long‐term breeding goals. Here, we demonstrate how haplotypes and ML can improve GS in B. napus .
期刊介绍:
Plant Biotechnology Journal aspires to publish original research and insightful reviews of high impact, authored by prominent researchers in applied plant science. The journal places a special emphasis on molecular plant sciences and their practical applications through plant biotechnology. Our goal is to establish a platform for showcasing significant advances in the field, encompassing curiosity-driven studies with potential applications, strategic research in plant biotechnology, scientific analysis of crucial issues for the beneficial utilization of plant sciences, and assessments of the performance of plant biotechnology products in practical applications.