Deep convection only temporarily intensified by aerosols

IF 20.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Denis Shum, Guy Dagan, Roni Shpitzer
{"title":"Deep convection only temporarily intensified by aerosols","authors":"Denis Shum, Guy Dagan, Roni Shpitzer","doi":"10.1038/s41561-026-02053-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether aerosols invigorate, suppress or have a weak effect on deep convection remains highly debated. Here we investigate how the timescale of aerosol perturbations controls convective responses and show that the apparent invigoration of convection is probably a transient effect. Using cloud-resolving models from a multi-model radiative–convective equilibrium intercomparison project and targeted perturbation experiments, we find that abrupt aerosol increases drive strong convective invigoration, which lasts for about 1 d, but this response vanishes as the environment adjusts and upper-tropospheric warming reduces cloud–environment thermal contrasts. Experiments with oscillating aerosol concentrations confirm this mechanism: rapid aerosol variability can lead to convective invigoration, whereas slow variability yields muted responses. A low-order model further supports the generality of this timescale-dependent framework. These findings highlight that the timescale of aerosol perturbations fundamentally governs their convective impacts—a critical consideration for interpreting both observations and model projections of aerosol–cloud interactions. A sudden rise in aerosols makes clouds more active for about a day. Then the effect fades as the atmosphere adjusts and warms aloft, reducing the contrast that helps clouds grow, according to cloud-resolving model simulations.","PeriodicalId":19053,"journal":{"name":"Nature Geoscience","volume":"19 9","pages":"1031-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":20.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-026-02053-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether aerosols invigorate, suppress or have a weak effect on deep convection remains highly debated. Here we investigate how the timescale of aerosol perturbations controls convective responses and show that the apparent invigoration of convection is probably a transient effect. Using cloud-resolving models from a multi-model radiative–convective equilibrium intercomparison project and targeted perturbation experiments, we find that abrupt aerosol increases drive strong convective invigoration, which lasts for about 1 d, but this response vanishes as the environment adjusts and upper-tropospheric warming reduces cloud–environment thermal contrasts. Experiments with oscillating aerosol concentrations confirm this mechanism: rapid aerosol variability can lead to convective invigoration, whereas slow variability yields muted responses. A low-order model further supports the generality of this timescale-dependent framework. These findings highlight that the timescale of aerosol perturbations fundamentally governs their convective impacts—a critical consideration for interpreting both observations and model projections of aerosol–cloud interactions. A sudden rise in aerosols makes clouds more active for about a day. Then the effect fades as the atmosphere adjusts and warms aloft, reducing the contrast that helps clouds grow, according to cloud-resolving model simulations.
深对流只是被气溶胶暂时加强
气溶胶是增强、抑制还是对深层对流有微弱的影响,仍然存在高度争议。在这里,我们研究了气溶胶扰动的时间尺度如何控制对流响应,并表明对流的明显增强可能是一种短暂的效应。利用多模式辐射-对流平衡对比项目和目标扰动实验的云分辨模式,我们发现气溶胶的突然增加驱动强对流增强,持续约1 d,但随着环境调整和对流层上层变暖减少云-环境热对比,这种响应消失。振荡气溶胶浓度的实验证实了这一机制:快速的气溶胶变化可导致对流增强,而缓慢的变化则产生微弱的反应。低阶模型进一步支持这种依赖于时间尺度的框架的通用性。这些发现强调了气溶胶扰动的时间尺度从根本上控制了它们的对流影响——这是解释气溶胶-云相互作用的观测和模式预测的关键考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Geoscience
Nature Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
26.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Nature Geoscience is a monthly interdisciplinary journal that gathers top-tier research spanning Earth Sciences and related fields. The journal covers all geoscience disciplines, including fieldwork, modeling, and theoretical studies. Topics include atmospheric science, biogeochemistry, climate science, geobiology, geochemistry, geoinformatics, remote sensing, geology, geomagnetism, paleomagnetism, geomorphology, geophysics, glaciology, hydrology, limnology, mineralogy, oceanography, paleontology, paleoclimatology, paleoceanography, petrology, planetary science, seismology, space physics, tectonics, and volcanology. Nature Geoscience upholds its commitment to publishing significant, high-quality Earth Sciences research through fair, rapid, and rigorous peer review, overseen by a team of full-time professional editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书