Uncorrelated Inequalities: A Multiproxy Measure for Household Archaeology

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Scott R. Hutson
{"title":"Uncorrelated Inequalities: A Multiproxy Measure for Household Archaeology","authors":"Scott R. Hutson","doi":"10.1007/s10816-026-09810-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inequality has received increased attention in the social sciences since the 1990s, in part because of the harm it causes and because massive inequality is avoidable. Bolstered by the Gini coefficient, a quantitative measure of unevenness in a distribution that enhances comparative studies across time and space, archaeologists have expanded the study of inequality in recent years. Many of these investigations use multiple variables to assess inequality. A challenge of such multi-proxy studies is that simply averaging Gini coefficients for multiple variables can over-represent inequality in societies where variables for inequality are not correlated. This paper provides an experimental measure—the Domain Sensitivity Gini (DSG)—and applies it to a sample of Maya archaeological case studies with extensive domestic excavations. The DSG helps disambiguate societies where wealth variables are aligned from societies where such variables are not aligned. In cases where variables do not align, different forms of wealth are not strongly correlated: a household that is poor in one domain might be wealthy in other domains. The DSG also suggests that inequality is lower than estimates based on averaged variables. This finding is valuable when set within a broader comparative context because it shows that high inequality seen today is not natural and that ancient case studies are relevant.","PeriodicalId":47725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-026-09810-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inequality has received increased attention in the social sciences since the 1990s, in part because of the harm it causes and because massive inequality is avoidable. Bolstered by the Gini coefficient, a quantitative measure of unevenness in a distribution that enhances comparative studies across time and space, archaeologists have expanded the study of inequality in recent years. Many of these investigations use multiple variables to assess inequality. A challenge of such multi-proxy studies is that simply averaging Gini coefficients for multiple variables can over-represent inequality in societies where variables for inequality are not correlated. This paper provides an experimental measure—the Domain Sensitivity Gini (DSG)—and applies it to a sample of Maya archaeological case studies with extensive domestic excavations. The DSG helps disambiguate societies where wealth variables are aligned from societies where such variables are not aligned. In cases where variables do not align, different forms of wealth are not strongly correlated: a household that is poor in one domain might be wealthy in other domains. The DSG also suggests that inequality is lower than estimates based on averaged variables. This finding is valuable when set within a broader comparative context because it shows that high inequality seen today is not natural and that ancient case studies are relevant.
不相关不平等:家庭考古的多代理测量
自20世纪90年代以来,不平等在社会科学领域受到越来越多的关注,部分原因是它造成的危害,而且大规模的不平等是可以避免的。近年来,在基尼系数(Gini coefficient)的支持下,考古学家扩大了对不平等的研究。基尼系数是一种衡量分布不平等程度的定量指标,可以加强跨时间和空间的比较研究。许多此类调查使用多个变量来评估不平等。这种多代理研究的一个挑战是,在不平等的变量不相关的社会中,简单地平均多个变量的基尼系数可能会过度代表不平等。本文提供了一种实验测量方法——域敏感性基尼系数(DSG),并将其应用于大量国内发掘的玛雅考古案例研究样本。DSG有助于消除财富变量一致的社会和这些变量不一致的社会的歧义。在变量不一致的情况下,不同形式的财富没有很强的相关性:在一个领域贫穷的家庭可能在其他领域富有。DSG还表明,不平等程度低于基于平均变量的估计。这一发现在更广泛的比较背景下是有价值的,因为它表明今天看到的高度不平等不是自然的,古代的案例研究是相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, the leading journal in its field,  presents original articles that address method- or theory-focused issues of current archaeological interest and represent significant explorations on the cutting edge of the discipline.   The journal also welcomes topical syntheses that critically assess and integrate research on a specific subject in archaeological method or theory, as well as examinations of the history of archaeology.    Written by experts, the articles benefit an international audience of archaeologists, students of archaeology, and practitioners of closely related disciplines.  Specific topics covered in recent issues include:  the use of nitche construction theory in archaeology,  new developments in the use of soil chemistry in archaeological interpretation, and a model for the prehistoric development of clothing.  The Journal''s distinguished Editorial Board includes archaeologists with worldwide archaeological knowledge (the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and Africa), and expertise in a wide range of methodological and theoretical issues.  Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory is rated ''A'' in the ERIH, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List.  For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书