The Activity Design Typology: A Practitioner-Centered Approach to Understanding Task Structure

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lara Bryfonski, Caitlyn Pineault
{"title":"The Activity Design Typology: A Practitioner-Centered Approach to Understanding Task Structure","authors":"Lara Bryfonski, Caitlyn Pineault","doi":"10.1177/13621688261459671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the central construct in task-based language teaching (TBLT), “task” has been defined in a myriad of ways. Though popular criterion-based definitions offer a tantalizingly straightforward description of the construct, they have, at times, proved difficult to apply in practitioner contexts. With over 17 definitions identified in the literature, prominent scholars have advocated for efforts that offer a more unified understanding of “task” that may be better able to support task-based language teaching in implementation initiatives. This exploratory, qualitative study examines how two cohorts of K–16 U.S.-based world language teachers ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 35) approached task design in a task-based teacher education program from a materials development perspective. An analysis of the 114 activities teachers created revealed that although submissions had task characteristics, the intricacies of their designs were not adequately captured by traditional task criterion. Subsequent analysis following a directed content approach identified five distinct categories of activity design. Advancing previous interest in expanding the binary distinction of “task” versus “non-task,” we drew on these categories to develop the Activity Design Typology. The typology serves as a resource for understanding, explaining, and evaluating instructional tools for their pedagogic and empirical value. Use cases for the task typology are discussed in relation to initiatives aimed to further instructed second language acquisition research agendas and support TBLT implementation efforts.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261459671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the central construct in task-based language teaching (TBLT), “task” has been defined in a myriad of ways. Though popular criterion-based definitions offer a tantalizingly straightforward description of the construct, they have, at times, proved difficult to apply in practitioner contexts. With over 17 definitions identified in the literature, prominent scholars have advocated for efforts that offer a more unified understanding of “task” that may be better able to support task-based language teaching in implementation initiatives. This exploratory, qualitative study examines how two cohorts of K–16 U.S.-based world language teachers ( n = 35) approached task design in a task-based teacher education program from a materials development perspective. An analysis of the 114 activities teachers created revealed that although submissions had task characteristics, the intricacies of their designs were not adequately captured by traditional task criterion. Subsequent analysis following a directed content approach identified five distinct categories of activity design. Advancing previous interest in expanding the binary distinction of “task” versus “non-task,” we drew on these categories to develop the Activity Design Typology. The typology serves as a resource for understanding, explaining, and evaluating instructional tools for their pedagogic and empirical value. Use cases for the task typology are discussed in relation to initiatives aimed to further instructed second language acquisition research agendas and support TBLT implementation efforts.
活动设计类型学:以实践者为中心的理解任务结构的方法
作为任务型语言教学(TBLT)的核心结构,“任务”的定义方式多种多样。尽管流行的基于标准的定义提供了对构造的诱人的直接描述,但它们有时被证明难以在实践环境中应用。文献中有超过17种定义,著名学者主张对“任务”进行更统一的理解,以便更好地支持任务型语言教学的实施举措。本探索性质的研究考察了两组K-16美国世界语言教师(n = 35)如何从材料开发的角度看待任务型教师教育项目中的任务设计。对114个教师活动的分析显示,尽管提交的材料具有任务特征,但传统的任务标准并没有充分捕捉到他们设计的复杂性。根据直接内容方法进行的后续分析确定了活动设计的五个不同类别。推进之前对扩展“任务”与“非任务”二元区分的兴趣,我们利用这些类别来开发活动设计类型学。类型学作为理解、解释和评估教学工具的教学和经验价值的资源。本文讨论了任务类型的用例,这些用例与旨在进一步指导第二语言习得研究议程和支持任务型教学法实施工作的举措有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书