“The market is about relying on each other”: The temporality of solidarity at the Fatih Çarşamba street market in Istanbul

IF 4.4 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Muhammet Esat Tiryaki, Talja Blokland
{"title":"“The market is about relying on each other”: The temporality of solidarity at the Fatih Çarşamba street market in Istanbul","authors":"Muhammet Esat Tiryaki, Talja Blokland","doi":"10.1177/00420980261465538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Street markets are specific relational urban settings, with rhythms of their own. This article addresses what sort of solidarities the fleeting relations of traders on street markets may generate. We expand Oosterlynk’s concept of <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">place-based</jats:italic> solidarity to explore street vendors practices in the street market as constituting two forms of solidarity following from the spatiality and temporality of the setting: unplanned solidarity that is anticipated based on shared experiences that suggest a ‘mandatory’ moral commitment to the future, but remains ambiguous, and calculated solidarity, where traders expect transactional trust out of instrumental logics. The case of Fatih Çarşamba Market (FÇM) in Istanbul, Türkiye, helps to theorise how both such solidarities follow as moral by-products of everyday interactions in a public space where agents ritualise and institutionalise or ‘make’ the ‘market’ as a <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">place</jats:italic> . Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews with street vendors, we show that while these solidarities advance economic resources, they are moral in how they come about. The market’s temporality makes some of them unplanned, but they are not <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">just</jats:italic> products of casually fleeting relations.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261465538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Street markets are specific relational urban settings, with rhythms of their own. This article addresses what sort of solidarities the fleeting relations of traders on street markets may generate. We expand Oosterlynk’s concept of place-based solidarity to explore street vendors practices in the street market as constituting two forms of solidarity following from the spatiality and temporality of the setting: unplanned solidarity that is anticipated based on shared experiences that suggest a ‘mandatory’ moral commitment to the future, but remains ambiguous, and calculated solidarity, where traders expect transactional trust out of instrumental logics. The case of Fatih Çarşamba Market (FÇM) in Istanbul, Türkiye, helps to theorise how both such solidarities follow as moral by-products of everyday interactions in a public space where agents ritualise and institutionalise or ‘make’ the ‘market’ as a place . Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews with street vendors, we show that while these solidarities advance economic resources, they are moral in how they come about. The market’s temporality makes some of them unplanned, but they are not just products of casually fleeting relations.
“市场是关于相互依赖的”:伊斯坦布尔法提赫Çarşamba街头市场的短暂团结
街头市场是特定的关系城市环境,有自己的节奏。这篇文章讨论了街头市场上短暂的贸易商关系可能会产生什么样的团结。我们扩展了Oosterlynk的基于地点的团结概念,探索街头小贩在街头市场中的实践,将其作为两种形式的团结:一种是基于共同经验的非计划团结,这种经验表明对未来的“强制性”道德承诺,但仍然模棱两可;另一种是经过计算的团结,在这种团结中,交易者期望交易信任来自工具逻辑。土耳其伊斯坦布尔的法提赫Çarşamba市场(FÇM)的案例有助于从理论上说明,在公共空间中,代理人将“市场”作为一个场所仪式化和制度化或“制造”“市场”,这两种团结是如何作为日常互动的道德副产品而遵循的。根据人种学的田野调查和对街头小贩的深入采访,我们表明,虽然这些团结促进了经济资源,但它们的产生方式是合乎道德的。市场的短暂性使得其中一些是计划外的,但它们并不仅仅是转瞬即逝的关系的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书