Assessing pediatric gastroenterologists' use of artificial intelligence in clinical and professional tasks.

JPGN reports Pub Date : 2026-07-09 DOI:10.1002/jpr3.70202
Ashwin Agrawal, Vineeta Guntupalli, Jonathan E Teitelbaum, Mohamed Elrais
{"title":"Assessing pediatric gastroenterologists' use of artificial intelligence in clinical and professional tasks.","authors":"Ashwin Agrawal, Vineeta Guntupalli, Jonathan E Teitelbaum, Mohamed Elrais","doi":"10.1002/jpr3.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential to enhance clinical efficiency. However, its real-world adoption among pediatric gastroenterologists (GIs) remains poorly characterized. The primary objective of this study was to assess how pediatric GIs are currently utilizing AI. Secondary objectives included estimating time saved, identifying commonly used tools, and evaluating the impact on burnout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional review board-approved anonymous survey was distributed via the international pediatric gastroenterology listserv. The questionnaire assessed demographics, types of AI technologies utilized, and estimated time saved through their use. The survey was open from September 30, 2025, to October 28, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and twenty-nine completed surveys were included in the analysis. Majority of respondents were from the United States (85.3%). AI was most frequently used for ambient AI scribes, dictation, answering clinical questions, preparing letters of medical necessity, and insurance appeals, with many reporting time savings with use of AI. In addition, 58.1% of respondents had utilized AI for some research-related purpose. AI utilization did not vary significantly across years of practice or practice type. Clinicians who utilized AI technology had higher frequency of self-reported reduced burnout. Few (28.7%) received training in AI, while the majority (84.4%) would like more education in the use of AI in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of AI tools by pediatric GIs is variable. Those who adopted AI reported reduced burnout and increased time savings, reflecting a positive impact on efficiency and clinician well-being. Despite limited formal training, there was a strong interest in AI education and clinical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":501015,"journal":{"name":"JPGN reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13398647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGN reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.70202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential to enhance clinical efficiency. However, its real-world adoption among pediatric gastroenterologists (GIs) remains poorly characterized. The primary objective of this study was to assess how pediatric GIs are currently utilizing AI. Secondary objectives included estimating time saved, identifying commonly used tools, and evaluating the impact on burnout.

Methods: An institutional review board-approved anonymous survey was distributed via the international pediatric gastroenterology listserv. The questionnaire assessed demographics, types of AI technologies utilized, and estimated time saved through their use. The survey was open from September 30, 2025, to October 28, 2025.

Results: One-hundred and twenty-nine completed surveys were included in the analysis. Majority of respondents were from the United States (85.3%). AI was most frequently used for ambient AI scribes, dictation, answering clinical questions, preparing letters of medical necessity, and insurance appeals, with many reporting time savings with use of AI. In addition, 58.1% of respondents had utilized AI for some research-related purpose. AI utilization did not vary significantly across years of practice or practice type. Clinicians who utilized AI technology had higher frequency of self-reported reduced burnout. Few (28.7%) received training in AI, while the majority (84.4%) would like more education in the use of AI in practice.

Conclusions: The use of AI tools by pediatric GIs is variable. Those who adopted AI reported reduced burnout and increased time savings, reflecting a positive impact on efficiency and clinician well-being. Despite limited formal training, there was a strong interest in AI education and clinical integration.

评估儿科胃肠病学家在临床和专业任务中使用人工智能的情况。
目的:人工智能(AI)已被证明具有提高临床效率的潜力。然而,其在儿科胃肠病学家(gi)中的实际应用仍然缺乏特征。本研究的主要目的是评估儿科gi目前如何利用人工智能。次要目标包括估计节省的时间,确定常用的工具,以及评估对倦怠的影响。方法:一项机构审查委员会批准的匿名调查通过国际儿科胃肠病学listserv分发。调查问卷评估了人口统计数据、所使用的人工智能技术类型,以及通过使用这些技术节省的估计时间。该调查于2025年9月30日至10月28日进行。结果:共纳入调查问卷129份。大多数受访者来自美国(85.3%)。人工智能最常用于环境人工智能抄写员、口述、回答临床问题、准备医疗需求信和保险上诉,使用人工智能可以节省许多报告时间。此外,58.1%的受访者曾将人工智能用于一些与研究相关的目的。人工智能的利用在不同的实践年限或实践类型之间没有显著差异。使用人工智能技术的临床医生自我报告的职业倦怠减少的频率更高。很少有人(28.7%)接受过人工智能方面的培训,而大多数人(84.4%)希望在实践中更多地使用人工智能。结论:儿童gi对人工智能工具的使用是可变的。那些采用人工智能的人报告说,他们减少了倦怠,节省了更多的时间,这反映了对效率和临床医生幸福感的积极影响。尽管正规培训有限,但人们对人工智能教育和临床整合有着浓厚的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书