Camila Ramos Silva, Tania Mateus Yoshimura, Jailda Nonato dos Santos Oliveira, Marcus Paulo Raele, Marcos Antonio Hortellani, Martha Simões Ribeiro, Denise Maria Zezell, Marcello Magri Amaral
{"title":"Comparing the Effects of Chemical Optical Clearing Agents and Mechanical Compression on the Optical Attenuation of Porcine Skin","authors":"Camila Ramos Silva, Tania Mateus Yoshimura, Jailda Nonato dos Santos Oliveira, Marcus Paulo Raele, Marcos Antonio Hortellani, Martha Simões Ribeiro, Denise Maria Zezell, Marcello Magri Amaral","doi":"10.1002/jbio.70323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Light scattering remains a primary challenge for deep-tissue optical diagnostics and therapies. While Optical Clearing Agents (OCAs) are used to reduce skin attenuation, Mechanical Compression (MC) is also applied in clinical settings despite its inconclusive results. Their relative effectiveness under standardized conditions remains poorly characterized. This study quantitatively compares various OCA formulations, including mineral oil, PEG-400, fructose, and tartrazine, with enhancers such as oleic acid and 1,2-propanediol, under load-dependent MC (1.6–47 kPa). Using spectral-domain OCT at 840 nm on porcine skin, we found that PEG-400/oleic acid (80/20%) achieved the highest efficiency, reducing the optical attenuation coefficient (OAC) by 23.8% ± 1.7% within 15 min. Fructose-based and aqueous tartrazine formulations also showed significant reductions (16.8% and 20.4%). Conversely, our results show that MC does not effectively reduce skin optical attenuation. These findings demonstrate that OCAs provide a more potent, stable reduction in OAC, offering a superior strategy for optimizing light delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biophotonics","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13400900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biophotonics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbio.70323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Light scattering remains a primary challenge for deep-tissue optical diagnostics and therapies. While Optical Clearing Agents (OCAs) are used to reduce skin attenuation, Mechanical Compression (MC) is also applied in clinical settings despite its inconclusive results. Their relative effectiveness under standardized conditions remains poorly characterized. This study quantitatively compares various OCA formulations, including mineral oil, PEG-400, fructose, and tartrazine, with enhancers such as oleic acid and 1,2-propanediol, under load-dependent MC (1.6–47 kPa). Using spectral-domain OCT at 840 nm on porcine skin, we found that PEG-400/oleic acid (80/20%) achieved the highest efficiency, reducing the optical attenuation coefficient (OAC) by 23.8% ± 1.7% within 15 min. Fructose-based and aqueous tartrazine formulations also showed significant reductions (16.8% and 20.4%). Conversely, our results show that MC does not effectively reduce skin optical attenuation. These findings demonstrate that OCAs provide a more potent, stable reduction in OAC, offering a superior strategy for optimizing light delivery.
期刊介绍:
The first international journal dedicated to publishing reviews and original articles from this exciting field, the Journal of Biophotonics covers the broad range of research on interactions between light and biological material. The journal offers a platform where the physicist communicates with the biologist and where the clinical practitioner learns about the latest tools for the diagnosis of diseases. As such, the journal is highly interdisciplinary, publishing cutting edge research in the fields of life sciences, medicine, physics, chemistry, and engineering. The coverage extends from fundamental research to specific developments, while also including the latest applications.