Monthly trends, determinants, and forecasting of perinatal mortality in Ghana: a comparison of ARIMA, BPNN, DLNN, and GRNN models.

IF 3.1 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2026-07-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2026.1849802
Agyei Helena Lartey, Denis Dekugmen Yar, Ama Asamaniwa Attua, Godfred Nyanney, Akuffo Samuel Tete Manukure, Isaac Takyi Boahen, Theophilus Oduro Kankam, Collins Mawuli Bakudie
{"title":"Monthly trends, determinants, and forecasting of perinatal mortality in Ghana: a comparison of ARIMA, BPNN, DLNN, and GRNN models.","authors":"Agyei Helena Lartey, Denis Dekugmen Yar, Ama Asamaniwa Attua, Godfred Nyanney, Akuffo Samuel Tete Manukure, Isaac Takyi Boahen, Theophilus Oduro Kankam, Collins Mawuli Bakudie","doi":"10.3389/frph.2026.1849802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal mortality is a critical indicator of the quality of maternal and newborn care across sub-Saharan Africa. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis estimated Ghana's pooled perinatal mortality rate at 44.8 per 1,000 births, highlighting ongoing barriers to meeting Sustainable Development Goal targets for neonatal survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, hospital-based time series analysis of 192 monthly observations from January 2010 through December 2025. Perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was defined as the sum of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths per 1,000 births. Stationarity was evaluated using the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test. Forecasting performance was compared across four models-ARIMA, backpropagation neural network (BPNN), deep learning neural network (DLNN), and generalized regression neural network (GRNN)-with model validation performed on a 2025 temporal holdout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hospital recorded 46,108 live births and 1,152 perinatal deaths, giving an overall PMR of 24.98 per 1,000 births. The undifferenced monthly PMR series was borderline non-stationary (ADF statistic -2.695; <i>p</i> = 0.075), while the first-differenced series was stationary (ADF statistic -7.118; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The best-performing ARIMA model on the 2025 holdout was ARIMA (3, 0, 0). Test-set RMSE values were 11.74 for ARIMA, 14.98 for BPNN, 12.87 for DLNN, and 13.33 for GRNN. In ecological monthly models, higher ANC coverage was associated with lower PMR, whereas higher hypertension burden was associated with higher PMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perinatal mortality declined over the long term but remained unstable. Among the evaluated models, ARIMA showed the best out-of-sample accuracy, while GRNN was the strongest neural-network comparator. Forecasts should be interpreted as operational projections rather than causal predictions.What is already known on this topic?Perinatal mortality remains high in many low- and middle-income countries, and stillbirths plus early neonatal deaths continue to contribute substantially to under-5 mortality in Ghana ( 1- 6).What this study addsThis study provides a 16-year monthly hospital time series, compares classical time-series forecasting with three neural-network approaches, and demonstrates that better ANC coverage and lower hypertension burden track with lower monthly PMR in this setting.How this study might affect research, practice, or policyMonthly PMR surveillance may help maternity hospitals monitor service quality, and ARIMA-based operational forecasting may assist planning for high-risk periods while service-improvement efforts focus on ANC utilization and maternal complication control.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"8 ","pages":"1849802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13396253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1849802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perinatal mortality is a critical indicator of the quality of maternal and newborn care across sub-Saharan Africa. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis estimated Ghana's pooled perinatal mortality rate at 44.8 per 1,000 births, highlighting ongoing barriers to meeting Sustainable Development Goal targets for neonatal survival.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, hospital-based time series analysis of 192 monthly observations from January 2010 through December 2025. Perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was defined as the sum of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths per 1,000 births. Stationarity was evaluated using the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test. Forecasting performance was compared across four models-ARIMA, backpropagation neural network (BPNN), deep learning neural network (DLNN), and generalized regression neural network (GRNN)-with model validation performed on a 2025 temporal holdout.

Results: The hospital recorded 46,108 live births and 1,152 perinatal deaths, giving an overall PMR of 24.98 per 1,000 births. The undifferenced monthly PMR series was borderline non-stationary (ADF statistic -2.695; p = 0.075), while the first-differenced series was stationary (ADF statistic -7.118; p < 0.001). The best-performing ARIMA model on the 2025 holdout was ARIMA (3, 0, 0). Test-set RMSE values were 11.74 for ARIMA, 14.98 for BPNN, 12.87 for DLNN, and 13.33 for GRNN. In ecological monthly models, higher ANC coverage was associated with lower PMR, whereas higher hypertension burden was associated with higher PMR.

Conclusion: Perinatal mortality declined over the long term but remained unstable. Among the evaluated models, ARIMA showed the best out-of-sample accuracy, while GRNN was the strongest neural-network comparator. Forecasts should be interpreted as operational projections rather than causal predictions.What is already known on this topic?Perinatal mortality remains high in many low- and middle-income countries, and stillbirths plus early neonatal deaths continue to contribute substantially to under-5 mortality in Ghana ( 1- 6).What this study addsThis study provides a 16-year monthly hospital time series, compares classical time-series forecasting with three neural-network approaches, and demonstrates that better ANC coverage and lower hypertension burden track with lower monthly PMR in this setting.How this study might affect research, practice, or policyMonthly PMR surveillance may help maternity hospitals monitor service quality, and ARIMA-based operational forecasting may assist planning for high-risk periods while service-improvement efforts focus on ANC utilization and maternal complication control.

加纳围产期死亡率的月度趋势、决定因素和预测:ARIMA、BPNN、DLNN和GRNN模型的比较
背景:围产期死亡率是撒哈拉以南非洲孕产妇和新生儿护理质量的关键指标。最近的一项系统审查和荟萃分析估计,加纳的围产期总死亡率为44.8‰,突出了实现可持续发展目标中关于新生儿存活率的具体目标的持续障碍。方法:我们对2010年1月至2025年12月期间192个月的观察结果进行了回顾性的、基于医院的时间序列分析。围产期死亡率(PMR)的定义是每1,000个新生儿中死产和早期新生儿死亡的总和。采用增强型Dickey Fuller (ADF)检验评估平稳性。通过四种模型——arima、反向传播神经网络(BPNN)、深度学习神经网络(DLNN)和广义回归神经网络(GRNN)——对预测性能进行了比较,并在2025年的时间点上进行了模型验证。结果:医院记录了46,108例活产和1,152例围产期死亡,总体PMR为每1,000例分娩24.98例。无差异月PMR序列为临界非平稳(ADF统计值为-2.695;p = 0.075),而第一差异月PMR序列为平稳(ADF统计值为-7.118;p)。结论:围产期死亡率长期下降,但仍不稳定。在评估的模型中,ARIMA显示出最好的样本外精度,而GRNN是最强的神经网络比较器。预测应被解释为业务预测,而不是因果预测。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?在许多低收入和中等收入国家,围产期死亡率仍然很高,死产和新生儿早期死亡继续是加纳5岁以下儿童死亡率的主要原因(1- 6)。本研究提供了16年的每月医院时间序列,将经典的时间序列预测与三种神经网络方法进行比较,并证明在这种情况下,更好的ANC覆盖率和更低的高血压负担与更低的月PMR有关。每月的PMR监测可以帮助妇产医院监测服务质量,基于arima的业务预测可以帮助规划高危期,而服务改进工作则侧重于ANC的使用和产妇并发症的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书