Impact of 15 years of social, political and economic shocks on population mental health in the UK: a longitudinal, Bayesian quasi-experimental analysis.

IF 6.6 0 PSYCHIATRY
Annie Jeffery, Connor Gascoigne, Ioannis Rotous, Xuewen Yu, Sara Geneletti, Gianluca Baio, Marta Blangiardo, James B Kirkbride
{"title":"Impact of 15 years of social, political and economic shocks on population mental health in the UK: a longitudinal, Bayesian quasi-experimental analysis.","authors":"Annie Jeffery, Connor Gascoigne, Ioannis Rotous, Xuewen Yu, Sara Geneletti, Gianluca Baio, Marta Blangiardo, James B Kirkbride","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2026-302688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health in the UK has worsened over the last 15 years, a period marked by major systemic shocks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated annual changes in population-level psychological distress and the impact of five systemic shocks: the referendum on European Union membership (Brexit), two COVID-19 lockdowns, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the UK Government's 2022 'mini-budget'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal survey data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, including 87 857 between years 2009 and 2024. We used Bayesian time series models to evaluate annual changes in psychological distress and the association with each shock, including subgroup analyses by age group, sex, ethnicity, deprivation quintile and employment status.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>We found evidence of increasing psychological distress from 2009 to 2023 (+1.085 point increase in 12-item General Health Questionnaire scores; credible interval (CrI) 0.987 to 1.184). In interrupted time series models, we observed increased psychological distress immediately after the Brexit referendum (+0.117, CrI 0.029 to 0.205) and the first COVID-19 lockdown (+0.649; CrI 0.531 to 0.767), with more insidious monthly increases in psychological distress after the Russian invasion of Ukraine (+0.010, CrI 0.004 to 0.023) and the 2022 mini-budget (+0.015, CrI 0.005 to 0.034). We found considerable sociodemographic variation by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and employment status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that some systemic shocks had detrimental effects on population mental health in the UK, being most pronounced for the Brexit referendum and first COVID-19 lockdown.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our results demonstrate that population mental health can change in response to systemic shocks. This should inform the design of responsive clinical and public mental health provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13404486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2026-302688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health in the UK has worsened over the last 15 years, a period marked by major systemic shocks.

Objective: We investigated annual changes in population-level psychological distress and the impact of five systemic shocks: the referendum on European Union membership (Brexit), two COVID-19 lockdowns, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the UK Government's 2022 'mini-budget'.

Methods: We used longitudinal survey data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, including 87 857 between years 2009 and 2024. We used Bayesian time series models to evaluate annual changes in psychological distress and the association with each shock, including subgroup analyses by age group, sex, ethnicity, deprivation quintile and employment status.

Outcomes: We found evidence of increasing psychological distress from 2009 to 2023 (+1.085 point increase in 12-item General Health Questionnaire scores; credible interval (CrI) 0.987 to 1.184). In interrupted time series models, we observed increased psychological distress immediately after the Brexit referendum (+0.117, CrI 0.029 to 0.205) and the first COVID-19 lockdown (+0.649; CrI 0.531 to 0.767), with more insidious monthly increases in psychological distress after the Russian invasion of Ukraine (+0.010, CrI 0.004 to 0.023) and the 2022 mini-budget (+0.015, CrI 0.005 to 0.034). We found considerable sociodemographic variation by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and employment status.

Conclusions: We found that some systemic shocks had detrimental effects on population mental health in the UK, being most pronounced for the Brexit referendum and first COVID-19 lockdown.

Clinical implications: Our results demonstrate that population mental health can change in response to systemic shocks. This should inform the design of responsive clinical and public mental health provision.

15年社会、政治和经济冲击对英国人口心理健康的影响:纵向贝叶斯准实验分析。
背景:在过去的15年里,英国的心理健康状况恶化了,这是一个以重大系统性冲击为标志的时期。目的:我们调查了人口层面心理困扰的年度变化以及五种系统性冲击的影响:英国退欧公投、两次COVID-19封锁、俄罗斯入侵乌克兰和英国政府2022年“小预算”。方法:我们使用来自英国家庭纵向研究的纵向调查数据,包括2009年至2024年间的87857人。我们使用贝叶斯时间序列模型来评估心理困扰的年度变化及其与每次冲击的关系,包括按年龄、性别、种族、剥夺五分位数和就业状况进行亚组分析。结果:我们发现从2009年到2023年心理困扰增加的证据(12项一般健康问卷得分增加+1.085分;可信区间(CrI) 0.987至1.184)。在中断时间序列模型中,我们观察到,在英国脱欧公投(+0.117,CrI 0.029至0.205)和第一次COVID-19封锁(+0.649;CrI 0.531至0.767)之后,心理困扰立即增加,而在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰(+0.010,CrI 0.004至0.023)和2022年迷你预算(+0.015,CrI 0.005至0.034)之后,心理困扰的月度增加更为潜伏。我们发现,年龄、性别、种族、贫困程度和就业状况等方面存在相当大的社会人口统计学差异。结论:我们发现,一些系统性冲击对英国人口的心理健康产生了不利影响,最明显的是英国脱欧公投和第一次COVID-19封锁。临床意义:我们的研究结果表明,人群的心理健康状况会随着系统性冲击而改变。这应该为临床和公共精神卫生服务的设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书