Akash Balasaheb Mote, Himani Dhanze, M Suman Kumar, Vibha Singh, K N Bhilegaonkar, Balbir B Singh
{"title":"Mapping Scrub Typhus Across Multiple Hosts in India.","authors":"Akash Balasaheb Mote, Himani Dhanze, M Suman Kumar, Vibha Singh, K N Bhilegaonkar, Balbir B Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10393-026-01830-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scrub typhus is a significant public health concern in India. Despite numerous studies on its prevalence across hosts and vectors, country-specific data remain unavailable. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide comprehensive insights into the prevalence of scrub typhus across humans, animal hosts, and vectors to aid disease control programs. The PECOS framework was used to identify eligible studies. A systematic search across six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Krishikosh, and Shodhganga) was conducted in March 2024. Data were classified by diagnostics and disease distribution across hosts and vectors for narrative synthesis. Study bias was assessed using a prevalence study checklist. A random- or common-effects meta-analysis model estimated overall and subgroup pooled prevalence across population types and diagnostic tests, with heterogeneity measured by the I<sup>2</sup> index. A total of 83 eligible studies published between 2003 and 2024 covered different regions, hosts, and vectors. The pooled prevalence (95% CI) of scrub typhus was 20% (11-34%) in 17,826 hospitalized AES cases, 19% (14-25%) in 28,617 hospitalized AUFI cases, and 13% (5-27%) in 14,828 community individuals. The animal level pooled prevalence in 1782 rodents/shrews was 6% (2-13%) with 6% (1-27%) of seroprevalence and 8% (3-19%) of molecular prevalence. The pooled prevalence in 1037 ectoparasite vector pools was 5% (1-17%). The meta-regression analysis suggested that geographical region, publication year, and sampling strategy were the prime moderators in community individuals, whereas season was the moderator in AUFI cases. Scrub typhus distribution was influenced by season, with regional differences in circulating strains as well as host and vector species predilection. This study highlights a high burden of disease in multiple hosts and vectors, along with hospitalized cases, suggesting differential diagnosis. A One Health approach is crucial for disease control, focusing on vector control and rodent management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-026-01830-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scrub typhus is a significant public health concern in India. Despite numerous studies on its prevalence across hosts and vectors, country-specific data remain unavailable. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide comprehensive insights into the prevalence of scrub typhus across humans, animal hosts, and vectors to aid disease control programs. The PECOS framework was used to identify eligible studies. A systematic search across six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Krishikosh, and Shodhganga) was conducted in March 2024. Data were classified by diagnostics and disease distribution across hosts and vectors for narrative synthesis. Study bias was assessed using a prevalence study checklist. A random- or common-effects meta-analysis model estimated overall and subgroup pooled prevalence across population types and diagnostic tests, with heterogeneity measured by the I2 index. A total of 83 eligible studies published between 2003 and 2024 covered different regions, hosts, and vectors. The pooled prevalence (95% CI) of scrub typhus was 20% (11-34%) in 17,826 hospitalized AES cases, 19% (14-25%) in 28,617 hospitalized AUFI cases, and 13% (5-27%) in 14,828 community individuals. The animal level pooled prevalence in 1782 rodents/shrews was 6% (2-13%) with 6% (1-27%) of seroprevalence and 8% (3-19%) of molecular prevalence. The pooled prevalence in 1037 ectoparasite vector pools was 5% (1-17%). The meta-regression analysis suggested that geographical region, publication year, and sampling strategy were the prime moderators in community individuals, whereas season was the moderator in AUFI cases. Scrub typhus distribution was influenced by season, with regional differences in circulating strains as well as host and vector species predilection. This study highlights a high burden of disease in multiple hosts and vectors, along with hospitalized cases, suggesting differential diagnosis. A One Health approach is crucial for disease control, focusing on vector control and rodent management.
期刊介绍:
EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity.
The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas:
One Health and Conservation Medicine
o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability
o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants
o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems
o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems
Ecosystem Approaches to Health
o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health
o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.