Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Barthel Index-dyspnea in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2026-02-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6213
Pınar Merç, Rengin Demir, Melih Zeren, Habibe Durdu, Ümit Yaşar Sinan, Mehmet Serdar Küçükoğlu
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Barthel Index-dyspnea in patients with pulmonary hypertension.","authors":"Pınar Merç, Rengin Demir, Melih Zeren, Habibe Durdu, Ümit Yaşar Sinan, Mehmet Serdar Küçükoğlu","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The Barthel Index-dyspnea (BI-d) is a respiratory disease-specific tool developed on the basis of the Barthel Index (BI), which provides a simple and quick way to measure the degree of dyspnea in activities of daily living (ADL). Dyspnea is one of the most common symptoms of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The objective of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the BI-d in patients with PH.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 73 PH patients were included in the study. Criterion validity was explored using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, while divergent validity was examined through correlations between the BI-d and BI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BI-d demonstrated strong correlations with the LCADL (r = 0.801) and mMRC (r = 0.775), and a moderately negative correlation with the 6MWD (r = -0.510), supporting criterion-related validity. A weak negative correlation with the BI (r = -0.289) supported divergent validity. The BI-d scores differed significantly across the mMRC grades and PH functional classes, confirming known-group validity. Reliability analyses showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the BI-d demonstrates high reliability and validity in PH. As a tool that integrates respiratory burden with activity-related functional performance, it provides a practical assessment of dyspnea-related impairment during ADL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"56 3","pages":"794-800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13398560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: The Barthel Index-dyspnea (BI-d) is a respiratory disease-specific tool developed on the basis of the Barthel Index (BI), which provides a simple and quick way to measure the degree of dyspnea in activities of daily living (ADL). Dyspnea is one of the most common symptoms of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The objective of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the BI-d in patients with PH.

Materials and methods: A total of 73 PH patients were included in the study. Criterion validity was explored using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, while divergent validity was examined through correlations between the BI-d and BI.

Results: The BI-d demonstrated strong correlations with the LCADL (r = 0.801) and mMRC (r = 0.775), and a moderately negative correlation with the 6MWD (r = -0.510), supporting criterion-related validity. A weak negative correlation with the BI (r = -0.289) supported divergent validity. The BI-d scores differed significantly across the mMRC grades and PH functional classes, confirming known-group validity. Reliability analyses showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94).

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the BI-d demonstrates high reliability and validity in PH. As a tool that integrates respiratory burden with activity-related functional performance, it provides a practical assessment of dyspnea-related impairment during ADL.

土耳其版Barthel指数-肺动脉高压患者呼吸困难的信度和效度。
背景/目的:Barthel指数-呼吸困难(BI-d)是在Barthel指数(BI)的基础上发展起来的一种呼吸系统疾病特异性工具,为日常生活活动(ADL)呼吸困难程度的测量提供了一种简单、快速的方法。呼吸困难是肺动脉高压(PH)最常见的症状之一。本研究的目的是探讨土耳其版PH患者BI-d的信度和效度。材料和方法:共纳入73例PH患者。采用改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和伦敦日常生活胸活动(LCADL)量表探讨标准效度,通过BI-d和BI之间的相关性检验标准的发散效度。结果:BI-d与LCADL (r = 0.801)和mMRC (r = 0.775)呈强相关,与6MWD呈中度负相关(r = -0.510),支持标准相关效度。与BI呈弱负相关(r = -0.289),支持发散效度。BI-d评分在mMRC等级和PH功能类别之间存在显著差异,证实了已知组效度。信度分析显示良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.85)和良好的重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.94)。结论:土耳其版BI-d在ph方面具有较高的信度和效度。作为一种整合呼吸负担和活动相关功能表现的工具,它为ADL期间呼吸困难相关损害提供了实用的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书