Pınar Merç, Rengin Demir, Melih Zeren, Habibe Durdu, Ümit Yaşar Sinan, Mehmet Serdar Küçükoğlu
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Barthel Index-dyspnea in patients with pulmonary hypertension.","authors":"Pınar Merç, Rengin Demir, Melih Zeren, Habibe Durdu, Ümit Yaşar Sinan, Mehmet Serdar Küçükoğlu","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The Barthel Index-dyspnea (BI-d) is a respiratory disease-specific tool developed on the basis of the Barthel Index (BI), which provides a simple and quick way to measure the degree of dyspnea in activities of daily living (ADL). Dyspnea is one of the most common symptoms of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The objective of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the BI-d in patients with PH.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 73 PH patients were included in the study. Criterion validity was explored using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, while divergent validity was examined through correlations between the BI-d and BI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BI-d demonstrated strong correlations with the LCADL (r = 0.801) and mMRC (r = 0.775), and a moderately negative correlation with the 6MWD (r = -0.510), supporting criterion-related validity. A weak negative correlation with the BI (r = -0.289) supported divergent validity. The BI-d scores differed significantly across the mMRC grades and PH functional classes, confirming known-group validity. Reliability analyses showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the BI-d demonstrates high reliability and validity in PH. As a tool that integrates respiratory burden with activity-related functional performance, it provides a practical assessment of dyspnea-related impairment during ADL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"56 3","pages":"794-800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13398560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: The Barthel Index-dyspnea (BI-d) is a respiratory disease-specific tool developed on the basis of the Barthel Index (BI), which provides a simple and quick way to measure the degree of dyspnea in activities of daily living (ADL). Dyspnea is one of the most common symptoms of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The objective of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the BI-d in patients with PH.
Materials and methods: A total of 73 PH patients were included in the study. Criterion validity was explored using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, while divergent validity was examined through correlations between the BI-d and BI.
Results: The BI-d demonstrated strong correlations with the LCADL (r = 0.801) and mMRC (r = 0.775), and a moderately negative correlation with the 6MWD (r = -0.510), supporting criterion-related validity. A weak negative correlation with the BI (r = -0.289) supported divergent validity. The BI-d scores differed significantly across the mMRC grades and PH functional classes, confirming known-group validity. Reliability analyses showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94).
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the BI-d demonstrates high reliability and validity in PH. As a tool that integrates respiratory burden with activity-related functional performance, it provides a practical assessment of dyspnea-related impairment during ADL.
期刊介绍:
Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical details of a given medical subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.