Measurable Residual Disease and the Unresolved Biology of Leukemic Stem Cells.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-25 DOI:10.1007/s12015-026-11195-5
Deepa Bhartiya, Nitu Jha, Shruti Dutta, Anish Tripathi, Ashish Tripathi
{"title":"Measurable Residual Disease and the Unresolved Biology of Leukemic Stem Cells.","authors":"Deepa Bhartiya, Nitu Jha, Shruti Dutta, Anish Tripathi, Ashish Tripathi","doi":"10.1007/s12015-026-11195-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has transformed the management of hematologic cancers by enabling detection of residual malignant cells after therapy. Current approaches rely on qPCR and next-generation sequencing to monitor leukemia-associated somatic mutations, while multiparameter flow cytometry identifies aberrant leukemic immunophenotypes. Although these methods provide valuable prognostic and therapeutic information, MRD negativity remains an imperfect surrogate for cure. Most MRD platforms evaluate CD45+, rapidly dividing leukemic populations and fail to detect quiescent cells that may survive cytotoxic therapies which efficiently target proliferating hematopoietic cells. Relapse frequently occurs despite deep molecular remission, suggesting persistence of rare leukemic stem cells (LSCs) that are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. The paradox of relapse despite molecular remission could be explained by the presence of very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) which are pluripotent, quiescent stem cells sitting at the top of cellular hierarchy in multiple adult tissues including bone marrow. A pluripotent VSEL divides through asymmetrical cell division to give rise to two cells of different sizes and fates, smaller cell is to self-renew while the bigger is lineage-restricted and tissue-committed progenitor which undergoes extensive epigenetic changes, divides rapidly and undergoes clonal expansion before further differentiation. Dysfunctions of VSELs initiate both solid and hematologic cancers. Based on this view, somatic mutations monitored during MRD assessment possibly represent downstream consequences of clonal expansion rather than the initiating drivers of disease persistence. Thus, exclusive monitoring of somatic mutations and CD45 + leukemic populations possibly overlook rare, small-sized, CD45- VSELs that contribute to therapeutic resistance and relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":21955,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","volume":" ","pages":"3406-3416"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-026-11195-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has transformed the management of hematologic cancers by enabling detection of residual malignant cells after therapy. Current approaches rely on qPCR and next-generation sequencing to monitor leukemia-associated somatic mutations, while multiparameter flow cytometry identifies aberrant leukemic immunophenotypes. Although these methods provide valuable prognostic and therapeutic information, MRD negativity remains an imperfect surrogate for cure. Most MRD platforms evaluate CD45+, rapidly dividing leukemic populations and fail to detect quiescent cells that may survive cytotoxic therapies which efficiently target proliferating hematopoietic cells. Relapse frequently occurs despite deep molecular remission, suggesting persistence of rare leukemic stem cells (LSCs) that are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. The paradox of relapse despite molecular remission could be explained by the presence of very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) which are pluripotent, quiescent stem cells sitting at the top of cellular hierarchy in multiple adult tissues including bone marrow. A pluripotent VSEL divides through asymmetrical cell division to give rise to two cells of different sizes and fates, smaller cell is to self-renew while the bigger is lineage-restricted and tissue-committed progenitor which undergoes extensive epigenetic changes, divides rapidly and undergoes clonal expansion before further differentiation. Dysfunctions of VSELs initiate both solid and hematologic cancers. Based on this view, somatic mutations monitored during MRD assessment possibly represent downstream consequences of clonal expansion rather than the initiating drivers of disease persistence. Thus, exclusive monitoring of somatic mutations and CD45 + leukemic populations possibly overlook rare, small-sized, CD45- VSELs that contribute to therapeutic resistance and relapse.

可测量的残留疾病和未解决的白血病干细胞生物学。
可测量的残留疾病(MRD)检测通过能够检测治疗后残留的恶性细胞,改变了血液病的管理。目前的方法依赖于qPCR和下一代测序来监测白血病相关的体细胞突变,而多参数流式细胞术可以识别异常的白血病免疫表型。虽然这些方法提供了有价值的预后和治疗信息,但MRD阴性仍然是治疗的不完美替代。大多数MRD平台评估CD45+,快速分裂的白血病群体,并不能检测到可能在有效靶向增殖造血细胞的细胞毒性治疗中存活的静止细胞。尽管深度分子缓解,但复发经常发生,这表明罕见的白血病干细胞(LSCs)对化疗和靶向治疗具有内在抗性。尽管分子缓解,但复发的悖论可以用非常小的胚胎样干细胞(VSELs)的存在来解释,这些干细胞是多能的,静止的干细胞位于包括骨髓在内的多个成人组织的细胞层次的顶端。多能性VSEL通过不对称细胞分裂产生两个不同大小和命运的细胞,较小的细胞自我更新,较大的细胞是受谱系限制和组织承诺的祖细胞,经历广泛的表观遗传变化,分裂迅速,在进一步分化之前进行克隆扩增。血管功能障碍会引发实体癌和血液癌。基于这一观点,MRD评估期间监测的体细胞突变可能代表克隆扩增的下游后果,而不是疾病持续的初始驱动因素。因此,对体细胞突变和CD45 +白血病人群的单独监测可能会忽略导致治疗耐药和复发的罕见的、小尺寸的CD45-血管内皮细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 医学-细胞生物学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Stem Cell Reviews and Reports is to cover contemporary and emerging areas in stem cell research and regenerative medicine. The journal will consider for publication: i) solicited or unsolicited reviews of topical areas of stem cell biology that highlight, critique and synthesize recent important findings in the field. ii) full length and short reports presenting original experimental work. iii) translational stem cell studies describing results of clinical trials using stem cells as therapeutics. iv) papers focused on diseases of stem cells. v) hypothesis and commentary articles as opinion-based pieces in which authors can propose a new theory, interpretation of a controversial area in stem cell biology, or a stem cell biology question or paradigm. These articles contain more speculation than reviews, but they should be based on solid rationale. vi) protocols as peer-reviewed procedures that provide step-by-step descriptions, outlined in sufficient detail, so that both experts and novices can apply them to their own research. vii) letters to the editor and correspondence. In order to facilitate this exchange of scientific information and exciting novel ideas, the journal has created five thematic sections, focusing on: i) the role of adult stem cells in tissue regeneration; ii) progress in research on induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and mechanism governing embryogenesis and tissue development; iii) the role of microenvironment and extracellular microvesicles in directing the fate of stem cells; iv) mechanisms of stem cell trafficking, stem cell mobilization and homing with special emphasis on hematopoiesis; v) the role of stem cells in aging processes and cancerogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书