First-Trimester Maternal CALLY Index Is Associated With Fetal Growth Restriction.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Esra Karakus, Ali Furkan Yahsi, Kubra Katipoglu
{"title":"First-Trimester Maternal CALLY Index Is Associated With Fetal Growth Restriction.","authors":"Esra Karakus, Ali Furkan Yahsi, Kubra Katipoglu","doi":"10.1111/aji.70301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and is frequently associated with placental malperfusion related to inflammatory and immune dysregulation. This study evaluated whether the first-trimester maternal C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, a composite marker reflecting systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and immune competence, is associated with subsequent FGR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study included 105 singleton pregnancies (69 FGR cases and 36 controls) at a tertiary center. FGR was diagnosed according to Delphi consensus criteria. The first-trimester CALLY index was calculated as (albumin × lymphocyte count) / CRP. Placental histopathology was evaluated according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group criteria. Group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CALLY index was significantly lower in the FGR group compared with controls (0.065 vs 0.170, p < 0.001). FGR cases also had lower birthweight (1910 vs 3120 g, p < 0.001) and placental weight (344.5 vs 585 g, p < 0.001). Maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) was more frequent in the FGR group (39.1% vs 13.9%, p = 0.015), while fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) showed borderline significance (63.8% vs 41.7%, p = 0.050). ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminatory ability for identifying FGR (AUC = 0.739, 95% CI: 0.652-0.826). A CALLY threshold ≤0.1265 yielded 75.4% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. After adjustment for maternal age, low CALLY remained significantly associated with FGR (adjusted OR: 6.118, 95% CI: 2.529-14.799, p < 0.001). Early-onset FGR cases (≤34 weeks) showed the lowest CALLY values (0.051). Additional ROC analyses for placental malperfusion endpoints showed limited discriminatory ability (AUCs: 0.592-0.636), indicating that CALLY is not a reliable standalone predictor of placental pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low first-trimester maternal CALLY index is associated with subsequent FGR. Its modest discriminatory ability for FGR (AUC = 0.739) suggests it may serve as a complementary tool in multi-parameter risk assessment, particularly when integrated with clinical and sonographic findings. However, the limited performance for placental malperfusion endpoints indicates that CALLY should not be used as a standalone test for predicting placental pathology. Further prospective studies are needed to define its clinical role.</p>","PeriodicalId":7665,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Reproductive Immunology","volume":"96 1","pages":"e70301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Reproductive Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.70301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and is frequently associated with placental malperfusion related to inflammatory and immune dysregulation. This study evaluated whether the first-trimester maternal C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, a composite marker reflecting systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and immune competence, is associated with subsequent FGR.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 105 singleton pregnancies (69 FGR cases and 36 controls) at a tertiary center. FGR was diagnosed according to Delphi consensus criteria. The first-trimester CALLY index was calculated as (albumin × lymphocyte count) / CRP. Placental histopathology was evaluated according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group criteria. Group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: The CALLY index was significantly lower in the FGR group compared with controls (0.065 vs 0.170, p < 0.001). FGR cases also had lower birthweight (1910 vs 3120 g, p < 0.001) and placental weight (344.5 vs 585 g, p < 0.001). Maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) was more frequent in the FGR group (39.1% vs 13.9%, p = 0.015), while fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) showed borderline significance (63.8% vs 41.7%, p = 0.050). ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminatory ability for identifying FGR (AUC = 0.739, 95% CI: 0.652-0.826). A CALLY threshold ≤0.1265 yielded 75.4% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. After adjustment for maternal age, low CALLY remained significantly associated with FGR (adjusted OR: 6.118, 95% CI: 2.529-14.799, p < 0.001). Early-onset FGR cases (≤34 weeks) showed the lowest CALLY values (0.051). Additional ROC analyses for placental malperfusion endpoints showed limited discriminatory ability (AUCs: 0.592-0.636), indicating that CALLY is not a reliable standalone predictor of placental pathology.

Conclusions: A low first-trimester maternal CALLY index is associated with subsequent FGR. Its modest discriminatory ability for FGR (AUC = 0.739) suggests it may serve as a complementary tool in multi-parameter risk assessment, particularly when integrated with clinical and sonographic findings. However, the limited performance for placental malperfusion endpoints indicates that CALLY should not be used as a standalone test for predicting placental pathology. Further prospective studies are needed to define its clinical role.

孕早期母体CALLY指数与胎儿生长受限有关。
背景:胎儿生长受限(FGR)是围产期发病的主要原因,常与胎盘灌注不良相关的炎症和免疫失调有关。本研究评估了妊娠早期母体c反应蛋白-白蛋白淋巴细胞(CALLY)指数(反映全身炎症、营养状况和免疫能力的复合指标)是否与随后的FGR相关。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了三级中心的105例单胎妊娠(69例FGR病例和36例对照)。根据德尔菲共识标准诊断FGR。早期妊娠CALLY指数计算为(白蛋白×淋巴细胞计数)/ CRP。根据阿姆斯特丹胎盘工作组标准评估胎盘组织病理学。采用Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行组间比较,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断效果。结果:FGR组CALLY指数明显低于对照组(0.065 vs 0.170, p < 0.001)。FGR患者的出生体重(1910比3120 g, p < 0.001)和胎盘重量(344.5比585 g, p < 0.001)也较低。FGR组产妇血管灌注不良(MVM)发生率较高(39.1%比13.9%,p = 0.015),胎儿血管灌注不良(FVM)发生率有显著性差异(63.8%比41.7%,p = 0.050)。ROC分析显示FGR的鉴别能力中等(AUC = 0.739, 95% CI: 0.652-0.826)。CALLY阈值≤0.1265的敏感性为75.4%,特异性为66.7%。在调整母亲年龄后,低CALLY与FGR仍然显著相关(调整OR: 6.118, 95% CI: 2.529-14.799, p < 0.001)。早发FGR(≤34周)CALLY值最低(0.051)。对胎盘灌注不良终点的额外ROC分析显示,区分能力有限(auc: 0.592-0.636),表明CALLY不是胎盘病理的可靠独立预测因子。结论:孕早期产妇CALLY指数低与随后的FGR有关。其对FGR的适度区分能力(AUC = 0.739)表明,它可以作为多参数风险评估的补充工具,特别是当与临床和超声检查结果相结合时。然而,胎盘灌注不良终点的有限表现表明,CALLY不应作为预测胎盘病理的独立测试。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定其临床作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
314
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Reproductive Immunology is an international journal devoted to the presentation of current information in all areas relating to Reproductive Immunology. The journal is directed toward both the basic scientist and the clinician, covering the whole process of reproduction as affected by immunological processes. The journal covers a variety of subspecialty topics, including fertility immunology, pregnancy immunology, immunogenetics, mucosal immunology, immunocontraception, endometriosis, abortion, tumor immunology of the reproductive tract, autoantibodies, infectious disease of the reproductive tract, and technical news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书