Resilience, tail-risk and connectedness mechanism: An inter-industry perspective

IF 7.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jiefei Huang, Zishuo Wang, Xia Zhao, Jiani Zuo
{"title":"Resilience, tail-risk and connectedness mechanism: An inter-industry perspective","authors":"Jiefei Huang,&nbsp;Zishuo Wang,&nbsp;Xia Zhao,&nbsp;Jiani Zuo","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2026.105409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While existing research has extensively examined inter-industry risk spillovers, it has largely neglected resilience connectedness across industries, overlooking a critical dimension of systemic stability. This paper uses the Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR) model to quantify industry-level resilience in China by assessing responses to multiple shocks, then constructs resilience networks using the DY spillover index and tail-risk networks through the LASSO-quantile regression to compare their transmission structure, and finally employs the Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) model and input–output linkages to analyze the spatial driving factors of these two interconnectedness mechanisms. The results indicate heterogeneity in industry resilience across shock origins. Static analyses reveal that resilience networks center on real-economy industries, whereas tail-risk network centers on finance industries. Dynamic results show that total resilience connectedness leads tail-risk connectedness, suggesting its utility as a forward-looking early warning indicator. The QAP estimates indicate that resilience tends to propagate upstream along supply chains, while tail risk flows downstream. Overall, this study provides a dual perspective of inter-industry resilience and risk connectedness, offering new evidence for risk management and policy design in complex economic environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 105409"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056026005228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While existing research has extensively examined inter-industry risk spillovers, it has largely neglected resilience connectedness across industries, overlooking a critical dimension of systemic stability. This paper uses the Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR) model to quantify industry-level resilience in China by assessing responses to multiple shocks, then constructs resilience networks using the DY spillover index and tail-risk networks through the LASSO-quantile regression to compare their transmission structure, and finally employs the Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) model and input–output linkages to analyze the spatial driving factors of these two interconnectedness mechanisms. The results indicate heterogeneity in industry resilience across shock origins. Static analyses reveal that resilience networks center on real-economy industries, whereas tail-risk network centers on finance industries. Dynamic results show that total resilience connectedness leads tail-risk connectedness, suggesting its utility as a forward-looking early warning indicator. The QAP estimates indicate that resilience tends to propagate upstream along supply chains, while tail risk flows downstream. Overall, this study provides a dual perspective of inter-industry resilience and risk connectedness, offering new evidence for risk management and policy design in complex economic environments.
弹性、尾部风险和连通性机制:行业间视角
虽然现有的研究广泛地考察了行业间的风险溢出,但它在很大程度上忽视了行业间的弹性连通性,忽视了系统稳定性的一个关键维度。本文采用时变参数向量自回归(TVP-VAR)模型,通过评估多重冲击的响应来量化中国行业层面的弹性,并通过lasso -分位数回归构建弹性网络和尾部风险网络,比较它们的传导结构。最后利用二次分配过程(QAP)模型和投入产出联系分析了这两种互联机制的空间驱动因素。结果表明,不同冲击来源的行业弹性存在异质性。静态分析表明,弹性网络以实体经济行业为中心,尾部风险网络以金融行业为中心。动态结果表明,总弹性连通性优于尾部风险连通性,表明其作为前瞻性预警指标的效用。QAP估计表明,弹性倾向于沿供应链向上游传播,而尾部风险则向下游流动。总体而言,本研究提供了行业间弹性和风险连通性的双重视角,为复杂经济环境下的风险管理和政策设计提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书