GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Endoscopy: Understanding Gastric Stasis, Aspiration Risk, and Contemporary Peri-Procedural Guidance

Q1 Medicine
Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-02 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI:10.1002/cdt3.70059
Junaid Beig, Jason Ta, Sophie Jones, Emily Scott, Khalid Sofi, Frances Osler, Marije Jansen, Puneet Chhabra
{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Endoscopy: Understanding Gastric Stasis, Aspiration Risk, and Contemporary Peri-Procedural Guidance","authors":"Junaid Beig,&nbsp;Jason Ta,&nbsp;Sophie Jones,&nbsp;Emily Scott,&nbsp;Khalid Sofi,&nbsp;Frances Osler,&nbsp;Marije Jansen,&nbsp;Puneet Chhabra","doi":"10.1002/cdt3.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global increase in obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has led to a higher use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Although GLP-1RAs provide significant metabolic, cardiovascular, and hepatic benefits, their tendency to slow gastric emptying has raised concerns about retained gastric contents (RGC), procedural complications, and a greater risk of pulmonary aspiration during sedation or anesthesia. This review offers a translational narrative synthesis of mechanistic, physiological, and clinical evidence connecting GLP-1RA therapy to changes in gastric motility and peri-endoscopic outcomes. Data from pharmacological studies, scintigraphic evaluations, large observational cohorts, and international consensus statements are combined to guide physiology-based procedural decisions. Evidence consistently indicates that GLP-1RA exposure is associated with a higher incidence of RGC and more frequent procedural disruptions during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, it remains uncertain whether RGC leads to clinically significant aspiration. Consistent with this, real-world data reveal no increase in aspiration pneumonia among GLP-1RA users undergoing colonoscopy, with reported aspiration rates of approximately 0.01%–0.05%. Likewise, during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, only a small absolute rise in aspiration-related events has been observed, involving fewer than 0.3% of procedures. Current guidelines favor continuing GLP-1RA therapy alongside dietary modification, structured risk assessment, selective gastric point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and multidisciplinary communication, rather than routine cessation. Emerging prospective evidence indicates that implementing a pre-procedural clear liquid diet, with individualized timing of weekly agents, may reduce the risk of clinically significant RGC, complementing existing dietary preparation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":32096,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine","volume":"12 3","pages":"183-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13393514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cdt3.70059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global increase in obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has led to a higher use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Although GLP-1RAs provide significant metabolic, cardiovascular, and hepatic benefits, their tendency to slow gastric emptying has raised concerns about retained gastric contents (RGC), procedural complications, and a greater risk of pulmonary aspiration during sedation or anesthesia. This review offers a translational narrative synthesis of mechanistic, physiological, and clinical evidence connecting GLP-1RA therapy to changes in gastric motility and peri-endoscopic outcomes. Data from pharmacological studies, scintigraphic evaluations, large observational cohorts, and international consensus statements are combined to guide physiology-based procedural decisions. Evidence consistently indicates that GLP-1RA exposure is associated with a higher incidence of RGC and more frequent procedural disruptions during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, it remains uncertain whether RGC leads to clinically significant aspiration. Consistent with this, real-world data reveal no increase in aspiration pneumonia among GLP-1RA users undergoing colonoscopy, with reported aspiration rates of approximately 0.01%–0.05%. Likewise, during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, only a small absolute rise in aspiration-related events has been observed, involving fewer than 0.3% of procedures. Current guidelines favor continuing GLP-1RA therapy alongside dietary modification, structured risk assessment, selective gastric point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and multidisciplinary communication, rather than routine cessation. Emerging prospective evidence indicates that implementing a pre-procedural clear liquid diet, with individualized timing of weekly agents, may reduce the risk of clinically significant RGC, complementing existing dietary preparation strategies.

GLP-1受体激动剂和内窥镜:了解胃瘀,误吸风险和当代围手术期指导。
肥胖症、2型糖尿病(T2DM)和代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)的全球增加导致胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)在接受胃肠道内窥镜检查的患者中的使用增加。尽管GLP-1RAs具有显著的代谢、心血管和肝脏益处,但其减缓胃排空的倾向引起了对胃内容物残留(RGC)、手术并发症和镇静或麻醉期间肺误吸的更大风险的担忧。这篇综述提供了将GLP-1RA治疗与胃运动和内镜周围结果的改变联系起来的机制、生理和临床证据的翻译叙述综合。来自药理学研究、科学评估、大型观察队列和国际共识声明的数据被结合起来指导基于生理学的程序决策。证据一致表明,GLP-1RA暴露与上消化道内窥镜检查时更高的RGC发生率和更频繁的程序中断有关。然而,RGC是否会导致有临床意义的误吸仍不确定。与此一致的是,实际数据显示,在接受结肠镜检查的GLP-1RA使用者中,吸入性肺炎没有增加,报告的吸入率约为0.01%-0.05%。同样,在上消化道内窥镜检查中,仅观察到吸入相关事件的小幅绝对上升,涉及不到0.3%的手术。目前的指南倾向于继续GLP-1RA治疗,同时调整饮食、结构化风险评估、选择性胃点超声(POCUS)和多学科交流,而不是常规停药。新出现的前瞻性证据表明,实施手术前的透明液体饮食,以及个性化的每周用药时间,可能会降低临床显著的RGC风险,补充现有的饮食准备策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote progress from basic research to clinical practice and to provide a forum for communication among basic, translational, and clinical research practitioners and physicians from all relevant disciplines. Chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, stroke, chronic respiratory diseases (such as asthma and COPD), chronic kidney diseases, and related translational research. Topics of interest for Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine include Research and commentary on models of chronic diseases with significant implications for disease diagnosis and treatment Investigative studies of human biology with an emphasis on disease Perspectives and reviews on research topics that discuss the implications of findings from the viewpoints of basic science and clinical practic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书