Ye-Jin Jang, Sung-Dug Oh, Dongmin Kim, Young-Kun Kim, Seong-Kon Lee, Ancheol Chang, Hyeon-Jin Sun, Hyo-Yeon Lee, Sang Jae Suh
{"title":"Long-term environmental risk assessment of glufosinate-tolerant GM zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia japonica</i> Steud.) on non-target arthropod communities.","authors":"Ye-Jin Jang, Sung-Dug Oh, Dongmin Kim, Young-Kun Kim, Seong-Kon Lee, Ancheol Chang, Hyeon-Jin Sun, Hyo-Yeon Lee, Sang Jae Suh","doi":"10.1080/21645698.2026.2704431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) crops is essential for evaluating their potential impact on non-target organisms under field conditions. In this study, a long-term field assessment was conducted to evaluate the ecological effects of glufosinate-tolerant GM zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia japonica</i> Steud.; events JG21 and JG21-MS1) on non-target arthropod communities at two geographically distinct living modified organism isolation sites in South Korea (Jeonju and Seogwipo). A total of 528,796 arthropods were collected and classified into three functional groups: pests (45.73%), natural enemies (14.51%), and other arthropods (39.76%). Arthropod community composition exhibited clear regional and temporal variations. Linear mixed-effects model (LMM) analyses indicated that arthropod abundance and diversity indices were primarily influenced by the year and region, whereas treatment effects, defined as differences between GM events and non-GM controls, were not significant. Although occasional statistical differences were detected, post hoc comparisons confirmed that arthropod communities associated with GM treatments were ecologically comparable to those of non-GM controls within each region and year (<i>p</i> > .05). Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination revealed clear clustering by region and year, with substantial overlap among treatments. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance showed that year explained the largest proportion of the variation (<i>R<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.640), whereas treatment effects were negligible (<i>R<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.006). Overall, these results provide robust field-based evidence that glufosinate-tolerant and male-sterile GM zoysiagrass does not adversely affect non-target arthropod communities, supporting its environmental safety in perennial agroecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54282,"journal":{"name":"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain","volume":"17 1","pages":"2704431"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13418464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2026.2704431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) crops is essential for evaluating their potential impact on non-target organisms under field conditions. In this study, a long-term field assessment was conducted to evaluate the ecological effects of glufosinate-tolerant GM zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.; events JG21 and JG21-MS1) on non-target arthropod communities at two geographically distinct living modified organism isolation sites in South Korea (Jeonju and Seogwipo). A total of 528,796 arthropods were collected and classified into three functional groups: pests (45.73%), natural enemies (14.51%), and other arthropods (39.76%). Arthropod community composition exhibited clear regional and temporal variations. Linear mixed-effects model (LMM) analyses indicated that arthropod abundance and diversity indices were primarily influenced by the year and region, whereas treatment effects, defined as differences between GM events and non-GM controls, were not significant. Although occasional statistical differences were detected, post hoc comparisons confirmed that arthropod communities associated with GM treatments were ecologically comparable to those of non-GM controls within each region and year (p > .05). Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination revealed clear clustering by region and year, with substantial overlap among treatments. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance showed that year explained the largest proportion of the variation (R2 = 0.640), whereas treatment effects were negligible (R2 = 0.006). Overall, these results provide robust field-based evidence that glufosinate-tolerant and male-sterile GM zoysiagrass does not adversely affect non-target arthropod communities, supporting its environmental safety in perennial agroecosystems.
期刊介绍:
GM Crops & Food - Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain aims to publish high quality research papers, reviews, and commentaries on a wide range of topics involving genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture and genetically modified food. The journal provides a platform for research papers addressing fundamental questions in the development, testing, and application of transgenic crops. The journal further covers topics relating to socio-economic issues, commercialization, trade and societal issues. GM Crops & Food aims to provide an international forum on all issues related to GM crops, especially toward meaningful communication between scientists and policy-makers.
GM Crops & Food will publish relevant and high-impact original research with a special focus on novelty-driven studies with the potential for application. The journal also publishes authoritative review articles on current research and policy initiatives, and commentary on broad perspectives regarding genetically modified crops. The journal serves a wide readership including scientists, breeders, and policy-makers, as well as a wider community of readers (educators, policy makers, scholars, science writers and students) interested in agriculture, medicine, biotechnology, investment, and technology transfer.
Topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Production and analysis of transgenic crops
• Gene insertion studies
• Gene silencing
• Factors affecting gene expression
• Post-translational analysis
• Molecular farming
• Field trial analysis
• Commercialization of modified crops
• Safety and regulatory affairs
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
• Biofuels
• Data from field trials
• Development of transformation technology
• Elimination of pollutants (Bioremediation)
• Gene silencing mechanisms
• Genome Editing
• Herbicide resistance
• Molecular farming
• Pest resistance
• Plant reproduction (e.g., male sterility, hybrid breeding, apomixis)
• Plants with altered composition
• Tolerance to abiotic stress
• Transgenesis in agriculture
• Biofortification and nutrients improvement
• Genomic, proteomic and bioinformatics methods used for developing GM cops
ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES
• Commercialization
• Consumer attitudes
• International bodies
• National and local government policies
• Public perception, intellectual property, education, (bio)ethical issues
• Regulation, environmental impact and containment
• Socio-economic impact
• Food safety and security
• Risk assessments