Risk and predictors of postoperative mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing trauma laparotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Omkaar Divekar, Aya Kambal, Jordan Stewart, Libor Hurt, Michalis Iosifidis, Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh
{"title":"Risk and predictors of postoperative mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing trauma laparotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.","authors":"Omkaar Divekar, Aya Kambal, Jordan Stewart, Libor Hurt, Michalis Iosifidis, Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2026.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effect of liver cirrhosis on postoperative mortality after trauma laparotomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis with meta-regression using random-effects modelling was conducted (last search: 25 August 2025). All studies comparing the risk of postoperative mortality in adult patients with and without liver cirrhosis undergoing trauma laparotomies were included. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies comprising 3,285 patients were included (cirrhosis group: 733; no cirrhosis group: 2,552). Both groups were comparable in terms of age (MD: 1.27 years, 95% CI -0.25, 2.79, p = 0.100), male sex (RD: 0.02, 95% CI -0.02, 0.06, p = 0.380), injury severity score (MD: 3.52, 95% CI -3.69, 10.73, p = 0.340), penetrating mechanism of injury (RD: -0.10, 95% CI -0.29, 0.09, p = 0.320), and blunt mechanism of injury (RD: 0.10, 95%CI -0.09, 0.29, p = 0.320). The risk of postoperative mortality was higher in patients with cirrhosis (OR: 3.68, 95% CI 2.76, 4.91, p < 0.00001). Age (coefficient: 0.015, p = 0.016) and blunt mechanism of injury (coefficient: 0.237, p = 0.047) increased the risk of postoperative mortality; penetrating mechanism of injury (coefficient: - 0.272, p = 0.042) was associated with reduced risk of mortality; male sex (coefficient: -0.424, p = 0.139) and injury severity score (coefficient: 0.004, p = 0.358) did not affect the mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver cirrhosis may increase the risk of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing trauma laparotomies (moderate certainty). The decision to perform a trauma laparotomy in a patient with cirrhosis should ideally be guided by a multidisciplinary discussion to carefully weigh the potential risks against the expected benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2026.07.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the effect of liver cirrhosis on postoperative mortality after trauma laparotomies.
Methods: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis with meta-regression using random-effects modelling was conducted (last search: 25 August 2025). All studies comparing the risk of postoperative mortality in adult patients with and without liver cirrhosis undergoing trauma laparotomies were included. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE system.
Results: Eight studies comprising 3,285 patients were included (cirrhosis group: 733; no cirrhosis group: 2,552). Both groups were comparable in terms of age (MD: 1.27 years, 95% CI -0.25, 2.79, p = 0.100), male sex (RD: 0.02, 95% CI -0.02, 0.06, p = 0.380), injury severity score (MD: 3.52, 95% CI -3.69, 10.73, p = 0.340), penetrating mechanism of injury (RD: -0.10, 95% CI -0.29, 0.09, p = 0.320), and blunt mechanism of injury (RD: 0.10, 95%CI -0.09, 0.29, p = 0.320). The risk of postoperative mortality was higher in patients with cirrhosis (OR: 3.68, 95% CI 2.76, 4.91, p < 0.00001). Age (coefficient: 0.015, p = 0.016) and blunt mechanism of injury (coefficient: 0.237, p = 0.047) increased the risk of postoperative mortality; penetrating mechanism of injury (coefficient: - 0.272, p = 0.042) was associated with reduced risk of mortality; male sex (coefficient: -0.424, p = 0.139) and injury severity score (coefficient: 0.004, p = 0.358) did not affect the mortality.
Conclusions: Liver cirrhosis may increase the risk of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing trauma laparotomies (moderate certainty). The decision to perform a trauma laparotomy in a patient with cirrhosis should ideally be guided by a multidisciplinary discussion to carefully weigh the potential risks against the expected benefits.
目的:探讨肝硬化对创伤性剖腹手术术后死亡率的影响。方法:采用随机效应模型进行符合prisma标准的meta-回归分析(最后检索时间:2025年8月25日)。所有比较创伤性剖腹手术中有肝硬化和无肝硬化成人患者术后死亡率风险的研究均被纳入。采用GRADE系统评价证据的确定性。结果:纳入8项研究,共3285例患者(肝硬化组733例,无肝硬化组2552例)。两组人可比的年龄(MD: 1.27年,95% CI -0.25, 2.79, p = 0.100),男性(理查德·道金斯:0.02,95% CI -0.02, 0.06, p = 0.380),损伤严重程度评分(MD: 3.52, 95% CI -3.69, 10.73, p = 0.340),穿透损伤机制(理查德·道金斯:-0.10,95% CI -0.29, 0.09, p = 0.320),和钝的损伤机制(理查德·道金斯:0.10,95% CI -0.09, 0.29, p = 0.320)。肝硬化患者的术后死亡率风险更高(OR: 3.68, 95% CI 2.76, 4.91, p )结论:肝硬化可能增加创伤性剖腹手术患者的术后死亡率风险(中等确定性)。对肝硬化患者进行创伤性剖腹手术的决定,最好是在多学科讨论的指导下,仔细权衡潜在风险和预期收益。
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.