Non-invasive detection of endometrial cancer through exfoliated cervical cell gene methylation signatures: Evaluation of CELF4/GALR1/ZNF486 methylation biomarkers.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Cytojournal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.25259/Cytojournal_135_2025
Xing Fan, Saiping Mao, Yingxia Ou, Fang Yu, Xiaoli Wang, Rong Wang
{"title":"Non-invasive detection of endometrial cancer through exfoliated cervical cell gene methylation signatures: Evaluation of <i>CELF4/GALR1/ZNF486</i> methylation biomarkers.","authors":"Xing Fan, Saiping Mao, Yingxia Ou, Fang Yu, Xiaoli Wang, Rong Wang","doi":"10.25259/Cytojournal_135_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current non-invasive screening methods for endometrial cancer (EC), such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), lack sufficient specificity, leading to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures. The detection of cancer-specific deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation alterations in cervical cytology samples presents a promising, minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of novel DNA methylation biomarkers (CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 methylation [<i>CELF4<sup>m</sup></i> ], Galanin receptor 1 methylation [<i>GALR1<sup>m</sup></i> ], Zinc finger protein 486 methylation [<i>ZNF486<sup>m</sup></i> ]) in cervical exfoliated cells for EC screening.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This case-control study enrolled patients scheduled for diagnostic or surgical curettage at the hospital from September 2024 to June 2025. A total of 104 women underwent endometrial evaluation (32 type I EC, 3 type II EC, 61 benign lesions [BL], 8 atypical hyperplasia). Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assessed biomarker performance against histopathological diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three markers (<i>CELF4<sup>m</sup>, GALR1<sup>m</sup>, ZNF486<sup>m</sup></i> ) showed significant differential ΔCp values between BL and EC groups (all <i>P</i> < 0.01), with moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve [AUCs]: 0.654-0.704). The single-marker <i>GALR1<sup>m</sup></i> outperformed endometrial thickness (ET) measured by TVUS in specificity (60.9% vs. 27.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) while maintaining comparable sensitivity (80.0% vs. 74.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.527). A two-marker panel (<i>GALR1<sup>m</sup></i> /<i>ZNF486<sup>m</sup></i> , Model 1) achieved sensitivity (97.1% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.6-100%]) with modest specificity (49.3% [95% CI: 37.5-61.1%]). Among three-gene models, Model 3 demonstrated the highest overall performance (AUC: 0.733 [95% CI: 0.657-0.808]; sensitivity: 91.4% [95% CI: 82.1-100%]), whereas Model 4 balanced sensitivity (80.0% [95% CI: 66.7-93.3%]) and improved specificity (63.8% [95% CI: 52.4-75.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNA methylation signatures in cervical cells show superior diagnostic accuracy to conventional ET measured by TVUS, particularly through multi-marker panels. This non-invasive approach represents a promising EC screening strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49082,"journal":{"name":"Cytojournal","volume":"23 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13378976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytojournal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_135_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current non-invasive screening methods for endometrial cancer (EC), such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), lack sufficient specificity, leading to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures. The detection of cancer-specific deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation alterations in cervical cytology samples presents a promising, minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of novel DNA methylation biomarkers (CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 methylation [CELF4m ], Galanin receptor 1 methylation [GALR1m ], Zinc finger protein 486 methylation [ZNF486m ]) in cervical exfoliated cells for EC screening.

Material and methods: This case-control study enrolled patients scheduled for diagnostic or surgical curettage at the hospital from September 2024 to June 2025. A total of 104 women underwent endometrial evaluation (32 type I EC, 3 type II EC, 61 benign lesions [BL], 8 atypical hyperplasia). Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assessed biomarker performance against histopathological diagnosis.

Results: All three markers (CELF4m, GALR1m, ZNF486m ) showed significant differential ΔCp values between BL and EC groups (all P < 0.01), with moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve [AUCs]: 0.654-0.704). The single-marker GALR1m outperformed endometrial thickness (ET) measured by TVUS in specificity (60.9% vs. 27.5%, P < 0.001) while maintaining comparable sensitivity (80.0% vs. 74.3%, P = 0.527). A two-marker panel (GALR1m /ZNF486m , Model 1) achieved sensitivity (97.1% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.6-100%]) with modest specificity (49.3% [95% CI: 37.5-61.1%]). Among three-gene models, Model 3 demonstrated the highest overall performance (AUC: 0.733 [95% CI: 0.657-0.808]; sensitivity: 91.4% [95% CI: 82.1-100%]), whereas Model 4 balanced sensitivity (80.0% [95% CI: 66.7-93.3%]) and improved specificity (63.8% [95% CI: 52.4-75.1%]).

Conclusion: DNA methylation signatures in cervical cells show superior diagnostic accuracy to conventional ET measured by TVUS, particularly through multi-marker panels. This non-invasive approach represents a promising EC screening strategy.

通过脱落宫颈细胞基因甲基化特征无创检测子宫内膜癌:CELF4/GALR1/ZNF486甲基化生物标志物的评估。
目的:目前子宫内膜癌(EC)的无创筛查方法,如经阴道超声(TVUS),缺乏足够的特异性,导致不必要的侵入性诊断程序。检测宫颈癌细胞学样本中癌症特异性脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)甲基化改变提供了一种有前途的微创替代方法。本研究旨在评估新型DNA甲基化生物标志物(CUGBP elaf -样家族成员4甲基化[CELF4m]、丙氨酸受体1甲基化[GALR1m]、锌指蛋白486甲基化[znf486])在宫颈脱落细胞EC筛查中的诊断潜力。材料和方法:本病例对照研究纳入2024年9月至2025年6月在医院进行诊断或手术刮除的患者。共有104名女性接受了子宫内膜评估(I型EC 32例,II型EC 3例,良性病变61例,非典型增生8例)。定量甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应评估生物标志物性能与组织病理学诊断。结果:三个标志物(CELF4m、GALR1m、ZNF486m)在BL组和EC组之间的ΔCp值均有显著差异(P均< 0.01),诊断准确率中等(ROC曲线下面积[auc]: 0.654-0.704)。单标志物GALR1m在特异性上优于TVUS测量的子宫内膜厚度(ET) (60.9% vs. 27.5%, P < 0.001),同时保持相当的敏感性(80.0% vs. 74.3%, P = 0.527)。双标记面板(GALR1m /ZNF486m,模型1)达到了97.1%的灵敏度(95%置信区间[CI]: 91.6-100%)和适度的特异性(49.3% [95% CI: 37.5-61.1%])。在三基因模型中,模型3表现出最高的整体性能(AUC: 0.733 [95% CI: 0.657-0.808];灵敏度:91.4% [95% CI: 82.1-100%]),而模型4平衡了灵敏度(80.0% [95% CI: 66.7-93.3%])和改进的特异性(63.8% [95% CI: 52.4-75.1%])。结论:宫颈细胞的DNA甲基化特征比传统的TVUS测量ET具有更高的诊断准确性,特别是通过多标记面板。这种非侵入性方法是一种很有前途的EC筛查策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytojournal
Cytojournal PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.10%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CytoJournal is an open-access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Diagnostic Cytopathology including Molecular aspects. The journal is owned by the Cytopathology Foundation and published by the Scientific Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书