Segmental Absence of Intestinal Musculature in Adults: A Report of Five Cases Among 86 Intestinal Perforations.

IF 0.4 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Case Reports in Pathology Pub Date : 2026-07-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/crip/2027784
Naoko Nambu, Yuki Kubo, Tsukasa Yoshikawa, Kaito Muroki, Nobuyuki Terada, Shin-Ichi Nakatsuka
{"title":"Segmental Absence of Intestinal Musculature in Adults: A Report of Five Cases Among 86 Intestinal Perforations.","authors":"Naoko Nambu, Yuki Kubo, Tsukasa Yoshikawa, Kaito Muroki, Nobuyuki Terada, Shin-Ichi Nakatsuka","doi":"10.1155/crip/2027784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among 86 adult patients who underwent surgery for intestinal perforation, excluding cases caused by cancer invasion or appendicitis, diverticulitis (33/86, 38%) was identified as the most common cause of perforation, followed by ischaemia (7/86, 8%) and segmental absence of intestinal musculature (SAIM) (5/86, 6%). In patients with SAIM-related perforation, the site of perforation was the sigmoid colon in four cases and the caecum in one. SAIM-related perforation occurred predominantly in older women and most frequently involved the sigmoid colon. The four patients with sigmoid colon perforation showed an abrupt loss of the muscularis propria. In the patient with caecal perforation, the muscularis propria exhibited separation and thinning with focal complete loss. Secondary inflammation or haemorrhage associated with the perforation was observed in the bowel wall surrounding the perforation site. However, there was no evidence of primary suppurative inflammation or necrosis causing of perforation. Given that the prevalence of SAIM among patients with bowel perforation appeared to be higher than previously assumed, it is essential to histologically examine sufficient tissue samples to avoid missing this diagnosis. Recognition of SAIM is clinically important, especially in adults without previous or current evidence of intestinal disease, as it should be considered a possible cause of intestinal perforation, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and prompt treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45638,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Pathology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"2027784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13392816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/crip/2027784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among 86 adult patients who underwent surgery for intestinal perforation, excluding cases caused by cancer invasion or appendicitis, diverticulitis (33/86, 38%) was identified as the most common cause of perforation, followed by ischaemia (7/86, 8%) and segmental absence of intestinal musculature (SAIM) (5/86, 6%). In patients with SAIM-related perforation, the site of perforation was the sigmoid colon in four cases and the caecum in one. SAIM-related perforation occurred predominantly in older women and most frequently involved the sigmoid colon. The four patients with sigmoid colon perforation showed an abrupt loss of the muscularis propria. In the patient with caecal perforation, the muscularis propria exhibited separation and thinning with focal complete loss. Secondary inflammation or haemorrhage associated with the perforation was observed in the bowel wall surrounding the perforation site. However, there was no evidence of primary suppurative inflammation or necrosis causing of perforation. Given that the prevalence of SAIM among patients with bowel perforation appeared to be higher than previously assumed, it is essential to histologically examine sufficient tissue samples to avoid missing this diagnosis. Recognition of SAIM is clinically important, especially in adults without previous or current evidence of intestinal disease, as it should be considered a possible cause of intestinal perforation, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and prompt treatment.

成人肠肌节段性缺失:86例肠穿孔中5例报告。
在86例接受手术治疗肠穿孔的成年患者中,除癌症侵袭或阑尾炎引起的病例外,憩室炎(33/ 86,38%)是最常见的穿孔原因,其次是缺血(7/ 86,8%)和肠肌节段性缺失(SAIM)(5/ 86,6%)。在samm相关穿孔患者中,4例穿孔部位为乙状结肠,1例为盲肠。samm相关穿孔主要发生在老年妇女,最常累及乙状结肠。4例乙状结肠穿孔患者表现为固有肌层突然消失。在盲肠穿孔患者中,固有肌层表现出分离和变薄,并伴有局灶性完全丧失。穿孔周围肠壁可见继发炎症或出血。然而,没有证据表明原发性化脓性炎症或坏死引起穿孔。鉴于肠穿孔患者中SAIM的患病率似乎高于先前的假设,有必要对足够的组织样本进行组织学检查,以避免遗漏这一诊断。对SAIM的认识在临床上具有重要意义,特别是对于过去或现在没有肠道疾病证据的成年人,因为它应被视为肠道穿孔的可能原因,从而促进早期诊断和及时治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书