PFAS Uptake by Plants in Soils Amended with Biosolids Derived from Wastewater with Industrial Input

IF 9.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
ACS Environmental Au Pub Date : 2026-07-15 Epub Date: 2026-04-21 DOI:10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00004
Aswin Kumar Ilango, Madhav Kharel, Weilan Zhang, Yanna Liang
{"title":"PFAS Uptake by Plants in Soils Amended with Biosolids Derived from Wastewater with Industrial Input","authors":"Aswin Kumar Ilango,&nbsp;Madhav Kharel,&nbsp;Weilan Zhang,&nbsp;Yanna Liang","doi":"10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl\r\nsubstances (PFAS) present in biosolids\r\npose challenges for the management of biosolids land application.\r\nThis study evaluated the phytoremediation potential of a grass-legume\r\nmixture derived from a Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) seed blend\r\nfor removing PFAS from biosolids-amended soils treated with biochar.\r\nThirteen representative PFAS were monitored in plant tissues over\r\na 92 day greenhouse experiment. Results showed that PFAS uptake was\r\nsignificantly influenced by soil type, biochar type and dose, and\r\nbiosolids characteristics. Notably, biosolids derived from a mixture\r\nof industrial and domestic wastewater, containing higher concentrations\r\nof PFAS precursors (1515.9 ± 1.89 μg/kg), resulted in reduced\r\nplant biomass and lower ΣPFAS removal of 0.3–0.7% compared\r\nto 1.0–2.5% of ΣPFAS removal with biosolids comprising\r\nPFAS precursors of 6.30 ± 1.89 μg/kg sourced solely from\r\ndomestic wastewater. While low-dose biochar (0.05%) enhanced PFAS\r\nuptake under certain conditions, higher doses (5%) generally stabilized\r\nPFAS, reducing their bioavailability. Isotopically labeled PFHxS and\r\nPFNA confirmed these patterns, with chain length influencing uptake\r\nefficiency. Leaching tests using water revealed that biochar amendments\r\nreduced PFAS leachability in Scantic soil but increased it in Woodbridge\r\nsoil, highlighting the need for site-specific remediation strategies.\r\nOverall, PFAS phytoextraction was less effective in biosolids derived\r\nfrom mixed industrial and domestic sources compared with those from\r\ndomestic wastewater alone. This study highlights the importance of\r\ntailoring phytoremediation and biochar applications to biosolids composition\r\nand soil properties to ensure safe and effective PFAS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":29801,"journal":{"name":"ACS Environmental Au","volume":"6 4","pages":"643–653"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Environmental Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present in biosolids pose challenges for the management of biosolids land application. This study evaluated the phytoremediation potential of a grass-legume mixture derived from a Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) seed blend for removing PFAS from biosolids-amended soils treated with biochar. Thirteen representative PFAS were monitored in plant tissues over a 92 day greenhouse experiment. Results showed that PFAS uptake was significantly influenced by soil type, biochar type and dose, and biosolids characteristics. Notably, biosolids derived from a mixture of industrial and domestic wastewater, containing higher concentrations of PFAS precursors (1515.9 ± 1.89 μg/kg), resulted in reduced plant biomass and lower ΣPFAS removal of 0.3–0.7% compared to 1.0–2.5% of ΣPFAS removal with biosolids comprising PFAS precursors of 6.30 ± 1.89 μg/kg sourced solely from domestic wastewater. While low-dose biochar (0.05%) enhanced PFAS uptake under certain conditions, higher doses (5%) generally stabilized PFAS, reducing their bioavailability. Isotopically labeled PFHxS and PFNA confirmed these patterns, with chain length influencing uptake efficiency. Leaching tests using water revealed that biochar amendments reduced PFAS leachability in Scantic soil but increased it in Woodbridge soil, highlighting the need for site-specific remediation strategies. Overall, PFAS phytoextraction was less effective in biosolids derived from mixed industrial and domestic sources compared with those from domestic wastewater alone. This study highlights the importance of tailoring phytoremediation and biochar applications to biosolids composition and soil properties to ensure safe and effective PFAS management.

工业废水中生物固体修正土壤中植物对PFAS的吸收。
生物固体中的全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)对生物固体的土地应用管理构成挑战。本研究评估了从保护储备计划(CRP)种子混合物中提取的草-豆科植物混合物去除经生物炭处理的生物固体改性土壤中PFAS的植物修复潜力。在为期92天的温室试验中,对13种具有代表性的PFAS进行了监测。结果表明,土壤类型、生物炭类型和剂量以及生物固体特性显著影响PFAS的吸收。值得注意的是,来自工业废水和生活废水混合物的生物固体,含有高浓度的PFAS前体(1515.9±1.89 μg/kg),导致植物生物量减少,ΣPFAS去除率降低0.3-0.7%,而来自生活废水的含有6.30±1.89 μg/kg的PFAS前体生物固体的ΣPFAS去除率为1.0-2.5%。虽然低剂量生物炭(0.05%)在某些条件下增强了PFAS的吸收,但高剂量(5%)通常稳定了PFAS,降低了它们的生物利用度。同位素标记的PFHxS和PFNA证实了这些模式,链长度影响吸收效率。用水浸出试验表明,生物炭改性降低了钪土壤中PFAS的浸出能力,但增加了Woodbridge土壤中的PFAS浸出能力,这突出了针对特定场地的修复策略的必要性。总的来说,PFAS植物提取物在工业和生活混合来源的生物固体中的效果不如单独从生活废水中提取的效果。该研究强调了根据生物固体组成和土壤性质调整植物修复和生物炭应用的重要性,以确保安全有效地管理PFAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Environmental Au
ACS Environmental Au 环境科学-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Environmental Au is an open access journal which publishes experimental research and theoretical results in all aspects of environmental science and technology both pure and applied. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome in the following areas:Alternative EnergyAnthropogenic Impacts on Atmosphere Soil or WaterBiogeochemical CyclingBiomass or Wastes as ResourcesContaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial EnvironmentsEnvironmental Data ScienceEcotoxicology and Public HealthEnergy and ClimateEnvironmental Modeling Processes and Measurement Methods and TechnologiesEnvironmental Nanotechnology and BiotechnologyGreen ChemistryGreen Manufacturing and EngineeringRisk assessment Regulatory Frameworks and Life-Cycle AssessmentsTreatment and Resource Recovery and Waste Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书