Diagnosis of Syphilis in Paraffin-Embedded Skin Biopsies: Comparison of Treponema pallidum Immunohistochemistry and Polymerase Chain Reaction in Primary and Secondary Stages of Disease.

IF 1.8 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Charlotte C Fuchs, Bastian Stoffers, Stephan A Braun, Almut Böer-Auer
{"title":"Diagnosis of Syphilis in Paraffin-Embedded Skin Biopsies: Comparison of <i>Treponema pallidum</i> Immunohistochemistry and Polymerase Chain Reaction in Primary and Secondary Stages of Disease.","authors":"Charlotte C Fuchs, Bastian Stoffers, Stephan A Braun, Almut Böer-Auer","doi":"10.3390/dermatopathology13030029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Syphilis remains one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections. Serology is the diagnostic gold standard, but skin biopsies aid in ambiguous cases. Treponemas can be detected in tissue by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR); however, their comparative performance across disease stages has not been extensively studied. This retrospective study of 48 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) skin biopsies from syphilis cases compared <i>Treponema pallidum</i> IHC and PCR. Of 48 biopsies, 42 (88%) were positive by <i>T. pallidum</i>-specific PCR, whereas IHC identified 45 (94%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Organisms were denser in primary syphilis (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and predominantly involved the lower third of the epidermis. In 7 of 45 biopsies (15%), treponemas were only detected in the dermis (all secondary syphilis). Therefore, <i>Treponema pallidum</i> IHC demonstrated a slight advantage over PCR, but low Treponema density in about 40% and epidermal absence in nearly 20% of secondary syphilis biopsies highlight a substantial risk of overlooking treponemas on IHC. Systematic assessment including endothelium and perivascular areas is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":42885,"journal":{"name":"Dermatopathology","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13398093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dermatopathology13030029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Syphilis remains one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections. Serology is the diagnostic gold standard, but skin biopsies aid in ambiguous cases. Treponemas can be detected in tissue by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR); however, their comparative performance across disease stages has not been extensively studied. This retrospective study of 48 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) skin biopsies from syphilis cases compared Treponema pallidum IHC and PCR. Of 48 biopsies, 42 (88%) were positive by T. pallidum-specific PCR, whereas IHC identified 45 (94%; p = 0.04). Organisms were denser in primary syphilis (p = 0.03) and predominantly involved the lower third of the epidermis. In 7 of 45 biopsies (15%), treponemas were only detected in the dermis (all secondary syphilis). Therefore, Treponema pallidum IHC demonstrated a slight advantage over PCR, but low Treponema density in about 40% and epidermal absence in nearly 20% of secondary syphilis biopsies highlight a substantial risk of overlooking treponemas on IHC. Systematic assessment including endothelium and perivascular areas is essential.

梅毒的石蜡包埋皮肤活检诊断:梅毒螺旋体免疫组织化学和聚合酶链反应在原发性和继发性疾病的比较。
梅毒仍然是最普遍的性传播疾病之一。血清学是诊断的金标准,但皮肤活检在模棱两可的病例中也有帮助。通过免疫组化(IHC)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)可以在组织中检测到密螺旋体;然而,它们在不同疾病阶段的比较表现尚未得到广泛研究。本研究对48例梅毒患者的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)皮肤活检进行回顾性研究,比较梅毒螺旋体IHC和PCR。48例活检中,42例(88%)白衣绦虫特异性PCR阳性,而免疫组化检测为45例(94%,p = 0.04)。原发梅毒的微生物密度更大(p = 0.03),主要累及表皮的下三分之一。45例活检中有7例(15%)仅在真皮中检出密螺旋体(均为继发性梅毒)。因此,梅毒螺旋体免疫组化比PCR有轻微的优势,但约40%的梅毒螺旋体密度低,近20%的二期梅毒活检没有表皮,这突出了免疫组化忽略梅毒螺旋体的重大风险。系统评估包括内皮和血管周围区域是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatopathology
Dermatopathology DERMATOLOGY-
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书