Medicaid Reimbursement and Other Funding Strategies for Community Health Workers: Perspectives of Employer Organizations in Indiana.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michael L Scanlon, Jasmine T Jackson, Melissa R Thomas, Debra K Litzelman
{"title":"Medicaid Reimbursement and Other Funding Strategies for Community Health Workers: Perspectives of Employer Organizations in Indiana.","authors":"Michael L Scanlon, Jasmine T Jackson, Melissa R Thomas, Debra K Litzelman","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate challenges and opportunities related to Medicaid reimbursement and other funding strategies for community health workers (CHW) among employers in Indiana.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using in-depth interviews with organizational and program leaders in 2024. Analysis used a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Indiana.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Leaders from 8 Indiana-based CHW employer organizations, including health systems, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), local health department, and community-based organization, supplemented by leaders of 3 non-Indiana-based organizations engaged in CHW policy, research, or advocacy elsewhere in the United States.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Organizational perspectives on CHW workforce funding, specifically Medicaid reimbursement, and alternative funding approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that CHW employers relied on short-term grant funding but that there was diversity in funding approaches. Only 1 of 8 Indiana-based CHW employers billed Medicaid for CHW services, with barriers to Medicaid reimbursement related to low reimbursement rates, complex billing procedures, limited billable activities, and structural exclusion to Medicaid reimbursement for some providers like FQHCs. Alternative funding approaches identified by employers included reforms to the current Medicaid policy, moving towards value-based payment models, pursuing braided funding approaches, and advocating with organizational leadership based on return-on-investment from CHW activities. Non-Indiana-based stakeholders highlighted additional strategies that could be pursued in Indiana to enhance sustainability, including managed care incentives or requirements for employing CHWs and dedicated workforce development partner organizations that can support CHW employers in building and sustaining their CHW workforces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insights from this study revealed current structural and policy challenges that CHW employers face in Indiana and can inform reforms to build a more sustainable CHW workforce to serve diverse health and community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"E238-E246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13596188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate challenges and opportunities related to Medicaid reimbursement and other funding strategies for community health workers (CHW) among employers in Indiana.

Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews with organizational and program leaders in 2024. Analysis used a framework approach.

Setting: Indiana.

Participants: Leaders from 8 Indiana-based CHW employer organizations, including health systems, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), local health department, and community-based organization, supplemented by leaders of 3 non-Indiana-based organizations engaged in CHW policy, research, or advocacy elsewhere in the United States.

Main outcome measure: Organizational perspectives on CHW workforce funding, specifically Medicaid reimbursement, and alternative funding approaches.

Results: We found that CHW employers relied on short-term grant funding but that there was diversity in funding approaches. Only 1 of 8 Indiana-based CHW employers billed Medicaid for CHW services, with barriers to Medicaid reimbursement related to low reimbursement rates, complex billing procedures, limited billable activities, and structural exclusion to Medicaid reimbursement for some providers like FQHCs. Alternative funding approaches identified by employers included reforms to the current Medicaid policy, moving towards value-based payment models, pursuing braided funding approaches, and advocating with organizational leadership based on return-on-investment from CHW activities. Non-Indiana-based stakeholders highlighted additional strategies that could be pursued in Indiana to enhance sustainability, including managed care incentives or requirements for employing CHWs and dedicated workforce development partner organizations that can support CHW employers in building and sustaining their CHW workforces.

Conclusions: Insights from this study revealed current structural and policy challenges that CHW employers face in Indiana and can inform reforms to build a more sustainable CHW workforce to serve diverse health and community settings.

社区卫生工作者的医疗补助报销和其他资助策略:印第安纳州雇主组织的观点。
目的:探讨印第安纳州雇主对社区卫生工作者(CHW)医疗补助报销和其他资助策略的挑战和机遇。设计:通过对2024年组织和项目领导者的深度访谈进行定性研究。分析使用了框架方法。设置:印第安纳州。参与者:来自8个印第安纳州CHW雇主组织的领导,包括卫生系统、联邦合格卫生中心(FQHCs)、当地卫生部门和社区组织,辅以3个非印第安纳州从事美国其他地方CHW政策、研究或倡导的组织的领导。主要结果测量:从组织角度看卫生工作者的资金,特别是医疗补助报销,以及替代的资金方法。结果:我们发现CHW雇主依赖于短期资助,但在资助方式上存在多样性。印第安纳州的8家CHW雇主中只有1家为CHW服务收取医疗补助费用,医疗补助报销的障碍与低报销率、复杂的计费程序、有限的计费活动以及一些供应商(如fqhc)对医疗补助报销的结构性排斥有关。雇主确定的其他资助方法包括改革现行的医疗补助政策,转向基于价值的支付模式,追求编织资助方法,以及倡导基于CHW活动的投资回报的组织领导。非印第安纳州的利益相关者强调了印第安纳州可以采取的其他战略,以提高可持续性,包括雇用卫生工作者的管理式医疗激励或要求,以及专门的劳动力发展伙伴组织,这些组织可以支持卫生工作者雇主建立和维持其卫生工作者队伍。结论:本研究的见解揭示了印第安纳州卫生工作者雇主当前面临的结构和政策挑战,并可以为改革提供信息,以建立更可持续的卫生工作者队伍,为多样化的卫生和社区环境服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书