Dosimetric evaluation of patient-side range shifters using two materials for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy: impact of material, air gap and setup distance.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Seiichi Ota, Tomohiro Kajikawa, Toshiyuki Ogata, Hisashi Takaya, Kenta Kijima, Tetsuya Okita, Norihiro Aibe
{"title":"Dosimetric evaluation of patient-side range shifters using two materials for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy: impact of material, air gap and setup distance.","authors":"Seiichi Ota, Tomohiro Kajikawa, Toshiyuki Ogata, Hisashi Takaya, Kenta Kijima, Tetsuya Okita, Norihiro Aibe","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrag058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of patient-side range shifters (RS) made of polymethyl methacrylate and high-density polyethylene for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy. The impact of air gap (AG) size and RS setup deviations on dose accuracy was investigated. A virtual water phantom and a simple volumetric beam arrangement were used for dose calculations in a treatment planning system employing a pencil beam algorithm with a triple Gaussian kernel. Gamma passing rates (GPRs) and point dose measurements were performed using a two-dimensional detector array and an ionization chamber, with AGs ranging from 0 to 110 mm. Results showed that GPRs exceeded 90% at depths of 9, 20 and 50 mm when the AG was within 80 mm, even under 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria. At AGs of 90-110 mm, reduced GPRs and >3% deviations in point dose measurements were observed at shallow depths. Setup deviation experiments were conducted by intentionally shifting the RS slab from the geometry used for reference measurements, and GPRs were evaluated relative to the corresponding measured reference at each original AG. The results indicated that shifts of up to ±10 mm from the reference AG had minimal dosimetric impact, with GPRs remaining above 96.8% under 1%/1 mm criteria. Maintaining the AG within 80 mm is recommended to ensure dosimetric accuracy. These findings suggest that patient-side RS systems can be a practical option in clinical scenarios where nozzle-mounted RS devices are not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"865-871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrag058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of patient-side range shifters (RS) made of polymethyl methacrylate and high-density polyethylene for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy. The impact of air gap (AG) size and RS setup deviations on dose accuracy was investigated. A virtual water phantom and a simple volumetric beam arrangement were used for dose calculations in a treatment planning system employing a pencil beam algorithm with a triple Gaussian kernel. Gamma passing rates (GPRs) and point dose measurements were performed using a two-dimensional detector array and an ionization chamber, with AGs ranging from 0 to 110 mm. Results showed that GPRs exceeded 90% at depths of 9, 20 and 50 mm when the AG was within 80 mm, even under 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria. At AGs of 90-110 mm, reduced GPRs and >3% deviations in point dose measurements were observed at shallow depths. Setup deviation experiments were conducted by intentionally shifting the RS slab from the geometry used for reference measurements, and GPRs were evaluated relative to the corresponding measured reference at each original AG. The results indicated that shifts of up to ±10 mm from the reference AG had minimal dosimetric impact, with GPRs remaining above 96.8% under 1%/1 mm criteria. Maintaining the AG within 80 mm is recommended to ensure dosimetric accuracy. These findings suggest that patient-side RS systems can be a practical option in clinical scenarios where nozzle-mounted RS devices are not feasible.

在点扫描质子治疗中,两种材料用于浅表治疗的患者侧范围移位器的剂量学评价:材料、气隙和设置距离的影响。
本研究旨在评估由聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和高密度聚乙烯制成的患者侧范围移位器(RS)在斑点扫描质子治疗中用于浅表区域治疗的剂量学特性。研究了气隙(AG)大小和RS设置偏差对剂量精度的影响。在采用三高斯核铅笔束算法的治疗计划系统中,使用虚拟水幻影和简单的体积光束排列进行剂量计算。伽玛通过率(GPRs)和点剂量测量使用二维探测器阵列和电离室,AGs范围从0到110 mm。结果表明,当深度小于80 mm时,在9、20和50 mm处的GPRs均超过90%,即使低于2%/2 mm的评价标准。在90-110 mm的AGs中,在浅深度处观察到GPRs降低,点剂量测量偏差>.3 %。通过有意地将RS板从用于参考测量的几何形状中移动来进行设置偏差实验,并在每个原始AG相对于相应的测量参考来评估gpr。结果表明,在1%/1 mm的标准下,gpr保持在96.8%以上,与参考AG相差±10 mm的剂量学影响最小。建议将AG保持在80mm以内,以确保剂量测定的准确性。这些发现表明,在不能使用喷嘴式RS装置的临床情况下,患者侧RS系统是一种实用的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书