The Role of Subjective Vitality Among Older Adults from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.4 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
James Dawe, Christina M Frederick, Sara Manganelli, Elisa Cavicchiolo, Fabio Alivernini, Giulia Raimondi
{"title":"The Role of Subjective Vitality Among Older Adults from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective: A Scoping Review.","authors":"James Dawe, Christina M Frederick, Sara Manganelli, Elisa Cavicchiolo, Fabio Alivernini, Giulia Raimondi","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics11040091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Aging involves several social, psychological, and biological changes, including changes in perceived energy. Within Self-Determination Theory, Subjective Vitality refers to the experience of having energy available to the self. Despite its relevance for older adults, no review has mapped how Subjective Vitality has been studied in this population. This scoping review aimed to map the literature on Subjective Vitality in older adults and identify gaps in the evidence base. <b>Method:</b> Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, five electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed quantitative articles published between 1997 and 2026 in which Subjective Vitality was assessed in samples with a mean age of 65 years or older. Of the 1915 records identified, 11 reports were included, corresponding to eight independent samples. <b>Results:</b> Studies were conducted in a limited number of countries, predominantly Western, and showed substantial heterogeneity across research domains. Subjective Vitality was most often assessed using the Subjective Vitality Scale, although different versions and response formats were used, and psychometric or adaptation evidence specific to older adults was limited. Potential antecedents and mechanisms included basic psychological need satisfaction, autonomy support, autonomous regulation, intrinsic goals, flow, social contacts, ego integrity, and meaning in life. Intervention studies suggested that leisure education and endurance training may support Subjective Vitality, although evidence remains limited. <b>Conclusions:</b> Future studies should use clearer sampling procedures, validated and well-reported measures, and stronger longitudinal and intervention designs capable of testing temporal and causal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13397999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11040091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aging involves several social, psychological, and biological changes, including changes in perceived energy. Within Self-Determination Theory, Subjective Vitality refers to the experience of having energy available to the self. Despite its relevance for older adults, no review has mapped how Subjective Vitality has been studied in this population. This scoping review aimed to map the literature on Subjective Vitality in older adults and identify gaps in the evidence base. Method: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, five electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed quantitative articles published between 1997 and 2026 in which Subjective Vitality was assessed in samples with a mean age of 65 years or older. Of the 1915 records identified, 11 reports were included, corresponding to eight independent samples. Results: Studies were conducted in a limited number of countries, predominantly Western, and showed substantial heterogeneity across research domains. Subjective Vitality was most often assessed using the Subjective Vitality Scale, although different versions and response formats were used, and psychometric or adaptation evidence specific to older adults was limited. Potential antecedents and mechanisms included basic psychological need satisfaction, autonomy support, autonomous regulation, intrinsic goals, flow, social contacts, ego integrity, and meaning in life. Intervention studies suggested that leisure education and endurance training may support Subjective Vitality, although evidence remains limited. Conclusions: Future studies should use clearer sampling procedures, validated and well-reported measures, and stronger longitudinal and intervention designs capable of testing temporal and causal relationships.

自我决定理论视角下老年人主观活力的作用:一个范围综述。
背景:衰老涉及一些社会、心理和生物变化,包括感知能量的变化。在自我决定理论中,主观活力指的是拥有可供自我使用的能量的体验。尽管主观活力与老年人相关,但目前还没有研究表明主观活力是如何在老年人中进行研究的。本综述旨在绘制老年人主观活力的文献图,并确定证据基础中的空白。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导,检索了五个电子数据库,检索了1997年至2026年间发表的同行评阅的定量文章,这些文章的样本平均年龄在65岁或以上。在确定的1915份记录中,包括11份报告,对应于8个独立样本。结果:研究在数量有限的国家进行,主要是西方国家,并且在研究领域中显示出实质性的异质性。主观活力最常使用主观活力量表进行评估,尽管使用了不同的版本和反应格式,并且针对老年人的心理测量或适应证据有限。潜在前因和机制包括基本心理需求满足、自主支持、自主调节、内在目标、心流、社会联系、自我完整性和生活意义。干预研究表明,休闲教育和耐力训练可能支持主观活力,尽管证据仍然有限。结论:未来的研究应该使用更清晰的抽样程序,经过验证和充分报告的测量方法,以及能够测试时间和因果关系的更强的纵向和干预设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书